Table 6. Comparison of the MacNab evaluation rates between the 2 groups.
| Items | N (%) | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | The total of excellent and good |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 103 (48.36) | 46 (44.66) | 33 (32.04) | 18 (17.48) | 6 (5.83) | 79 (76.70) |
| Group B | 110 (51.64) | 72 (65.45) | 27 (24.55) | 9 (8.18) | 2 (1.82) | 99 (90.00) |
| χ2 | 11.111 | 6.853 | ||||
| P value | 0.011 | 0.009 | ||||
Data are represented as n (%). Group A: underwent conventional C-arm fluoroscopy-assisted system alone intervertebral foraminoscopic surgery; Group B: underwent 3D CT navigation-assisted intervertebral foraminoscopic surgery. χ2, chi-square test; 3D CT, 3-dimensional computed tomography.