Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 11;13(10):6735–6749. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1073

Table 2. Characteristics of the patients in the training and validation cohorts.

Characteristics Training cohort (n=108) Validation cohort (n=45) P
Nonluminal (n=39) Luminal (n=69) P Nonluminal (n=16) Luminal (n=29) P
Age, mean ± SD, years 51.90±9.86 48.17±8.95 0.048 50.00±7.49 52.21±10.50 0.463 0.278
ADC value, median (IQR) 1.06 (0.96, 1.23) 0.98 (0.85, 1.08) 0.015 1.06 (0.90, 1.15) 0.90 (0.83, 1.08) 0.046 0.322
TIC, % 0.664 0.900 0.137
   Wash-out 29 (74.36) 48 (69.57) 13 (81.25) 24 (82.75)
   Plateau 8 (20.51) 19 (27.53) 3 (18.75) 5 (17.25)
   Wash-in 2 (5.13) 2 (2.89) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
BI-RADS, % 0.168 0.104 0.822
   4A 0 (0.00) 2 (2.90) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
   4B 5 (12.82) 10 (14.49) 2 (12.50) 6 (20.69)
   4C 22 (56.41) 44 (63.77) 8 (50.00) 19 (65.52)
   5 12 (30.77) 13 (18.84) 6 (37.50) 4 (13.79)
Ki-67, % 0.730 0.742 0.716
   Low 9 (23.08) 18 (26.09) 4 (25.00) 6 (20.69)
   High 30 (76.12) 51 (73.91) 12 (75.00) 23 (79.31)
HER2, % <0.001 0.003 0.019
   Negative 13 (33.33) 48 (69.57) 1 (6.25) 15 (51.72)
   Positive 26 (66.67) 21 (30.43) 15 (93.75) 14 (48.28)
Histologic grade, % 0.001 0.017 0.531
   I and II 26 (66.67) 65 (94.20) 10 (62.50) 27 (93.10)
   III 13 (33.33) 4 (5.80) 6 (37.50) 2 (6.90)
Rad-score, median (IQR) 0.25 (−0.19, 0.58) 0.98 (0.37, 1.56) <0.001 0.10 (−0.55, 0.53) 0.81 (0.25, 1.54) 0.017 0.200

P value was obtained from univariate association analysis between each clinicopathological variable and breast cancer type. P indicates the comparative analysis between the training cohort and the validation cohort. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; BI-RADS, breast imaging reporting and data system; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IQR, interquartile range; Rad-score, radiomics score; SD, standard deviation; TIC, time-intensity curve.