Table 4.
Estimated Unstandardized Parameters of Linear Latent Growth Curve Using SEM Approach and MLM Approach
| Mother report | Father report | Adolescent report | Mother-Adolescent discrepancy |
Father-Adolescent discrepancy |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | SEM | MLM | SEM | MLM | SEM | MLM | SEM | MLM | SEM | MLM |
| Fix part | ||||||||||
| Intercept | .296 | .296 | .275 | .277 | .222 | .224 | .104 | .101 | .078 | .079 |
| Slope | −.015 | −.013 | −.018 | −.017 | .015 | .016 | −.048 | −.045 | −.054 | −.053 |
| Random part | ||||||||||
| Intercept | .064 | .059 | .065 | .060 | .036 | .034 | .087 | .077 | .073 | .060 |
| Slope | .002 | .002 | .001 | .001 | .003 | .002 | .005 | .002 | .004 | .001 |
Note. SEM = structural equation model, MLM = multilevel model. Models include intervention status as a covariate.
All estimated parameters were statistically significant at .001 level.