Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 19;21(10):e08107. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8107

Table A87.

Result report on EKE question 3

Overview of the results of the Expert Knowledge Elicitation Question 3
Parameter Proportion of organic waste going to private composting
Stratification Countries in the climatically suitable area/only one average of the climatically suitable area
Question Compared to the waste counted in the statistics of Eurostat, what additional proportion of organic waste is going to private composting?
Unit [%], theoretical restriction: 0–100%
Results P1% P2.5% P5% P10% P16.7% P25% P33.3% P50% P66.7% P75% P83.3% P90% P95% P97.5% P99%
Elicited values 2% 8% 13% 25% 40%
EKE results 2.0% 2.2% 2.6% 3.6% 5.1% 7.1% 9.4% 14% 21% 24% 28% 32% 36% 38% 40%
Fitted distribution BetaGeneral (0.85283, 1.555, 0.0188, 0.425)
graphic file with name EFS2-21-e08107-g036.jpg graphic file with name EFS2-21-e08107-g032.jpg
Figure (a): Comparison of elicited and fitted values/density function to describe the remaining uncertainties of the parameter Figure (b): Cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the likelihood of the parameter
Summary of the evidence used for the evaluation
  • Literature on home composting (e.g. see: Colón et al., 2010; Tatàno et al., 2015; Stenmarck et al., 2016; Žitnik and Vidic, 2016; ISPRA, 2021; Sulewski et al., 2021)

Main uncertainties
  • Lack of data on volumes of organic waste treated as home composting and on conditions of home composting

Reasoning for a scenario which would lead to a reasonable high proportion The judgement on the upper limit considers that
  • Level of population living in houses (50%)/High rate of private compost in a survey/Complete organic part going to private compost

  • Slovenia is an example for a high rate 48% of private compost, but high proportion of living in houses

Reasoning for a scenario which would lead to a reasonable low proportion The judgement on the lower limit considers that
  • It is above 0%, because it includes all kind of disposal of organic waste (dumping, feeding, etc.), not only composted waste

  • 24% of population is living in rural areas

Fair estimate as judgement on the weighted evidence The judgement on the median considers that
  • Statistics from 5 countries mainly Northern/Western EU shows about 8%, for the countries of the climatically suitable area the home composting will be higher

  • High part of the population living in rural areas

  • It includes all kind of disposal of organic waste (dumping, feeding, etc.), not only composted waste

Precision of the judgement as description of remaining uncertainties The judgement on the interquartile range considers that
  • High uncertain on both sides of the median value

Experts Antoon LOOMANS, Panos MILONAS, Klara NICOVA, Giuseppe STANCANELLI, Hans‐Hermann THULKE
Facilitator/Reporter Olaf MOSBACH‐SCHULZ (facilitator)
Observers na
Date and place of the EKE Virtual meeting on 9 January 2023