Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun;23(6-a Suppl):10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6-a.s34. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6-a.s34

TABLE 2.

Interclass Correlation Coefficients by Reviewer Type and Subdomaina

ASCO ESMO ICER NCCN
All reviewers (n = 8), ICC (95% CI) 0.800 (0.660-0.913) 0.818 (0.686-0.921) 0.652 (0.466-0.834) 0.153 (0.045-0.371)
Oncologists vs. non-oncologists
Oncologists (n = 4) 0.807 (0.638-0.920) 0.842 (0.699-0.936) 0.769 (0.582-0.903) 0.210 (0.020-0.501)
Other (n = 4) 0.786 (0.605-0.911) 0.816 (0.655-0.924) 0.603 (0.353-0.817) 0.156 (0b-0.427)
Physicians vs. nonphysicians
Physicians (n = 6) 0.825 (0.686-0.926) 0.831 (0.698-0.929) 0.641 (0.439-0.830) 0.156 (0.031-0.395)
Other (n = 2) 0.740 (0.375-0.905) 0.691 (0.302-0.884) 0.482 (0.023-0.784) 0.198 (0b-0.597)
By subdomain
Clinical benefit 0.829 (0.704-0.927) 0.809 (0.673-0.917) - (-) 0.149 (0.041-0.368)
Toxicity 0.755 (0.592-0.891) 0.597 (0.406-0.800) - (-) 0.194 (0.067-0.432)
Quality of life 0.671 (0.490-0.844) 0.818 (0.686-0.921) - (-) - (-)
Certainty - (-) - (-) 0.062 (0b-0.247) 0.022 (0b-0.129)

aICC and CI are shown as measure of framework reliability.

bNegative ICC estimate was observed, which suggested that the true ICC is very low; ICC of zero was therefore assumed.34

ASCO = American Society of Clinical Oncology; CI = confidence interval; ESMO = European Society for Medical Oncology; ICC = interclass correlation coefficient; ICER = Institute for Clinical and Economic Review.