Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Hous Policy Debate. 2022 Jun 8;32(6):853–875. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2075027

Table 2.

Study population service details and demographics, by cohort.

Item Cohort 1: Group hotel Cohort 2: Enhanced shelter Cohort 3: Shelter with basic services Total Study population
Study population and cohort sizes
Size (n) 383 926 326 1,635
Size (% of total study population) 23 57 20 100
Service details
De-intensified facility Yes Yes Yes
Room Private Shared Shared
Bathroom Private Shared Shared
Hours of access 24/7 Variable Variable
On-site case management Yes Yes No
Gender (% in cohort)
Female 31 24** 39** 29
Male 67 75*** 60** 70
Other or unknown 2 1 1 1
Race and ethnicity (% in cohort)
American Indian or Alaska Native 1 3*** 3*** 3
Asian 4 3 6 4
Black or African American 28 29 19*** 27
Hispanic/Latino 11 12 16* 12
Multiracial 3 5 5 4
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 2 1 1 1
White 49 44 42* 45
Unknown 4 2 9** 4
Age group (% in cohort)
18–24
25–54 52 58** 63*** 58
55 and older 48 41** 36*** 41
Chronic homeless status (%)
Not Chronically homeless 68 61*** 83*** 67
Chronically homeless 32 39*** 18*** 33
Veteran status (%)
Veteran Nonveteran 7 12*** 6 10
Veteran Nonveteran 93 88*** 94 90

Note. Data in Table 2 are reported as of 9/1/2020 from the Seattle/King County Homeless Management Information System.

*, **, and ***

represent a statistically significant difference between Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, and between Cohort 1 and Cohort 3, at p ≤ .10, p ≤ .05 and p ≤ .01, respectively.