Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2022 Dec 26;32(3):876–891. doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02517-5

Table 1.

Demographic and Baseline Information of Participants with and without T2 Data

Demographic or baseline variable Attended outcome assessment (n = 141) Did not attend outcome assessment (n = 23)

n (%) M (SD) n (%) M (SD)
Age (years) 29.37 (6.21) 31.39 (6.96)
Education
 Some HS 23 (17) 8 (32)
 HS graduate 65 (48) 10 (40)
 Some college 43 (32) 6 (24)
 College graduate 5 (4) 1 (4)
Race
 African American 106 (79) 18 (82)
 Other 28 (21) 4 (18)
 American Indian or Alaska Native 3 (2) 0 (0)
 Asian or Asian American 0 (0) 1 (5)
 Hispanic or Latino 2 (1) 0 (0)
 Non-Hispanic White 17 (13) 3 (14)
 Other 6 (4) 0 (0)
Marital status
 Single 116 (84) 21 (84)
 Married 22 (16) 4 (16)
T1 attachment style
 Anxiety 3.16 (1.27) 3.15 (1.31)
 Avoidance 3.23 (1.18) 3.57 (1.29)
T1 unsupportive PRD
 Punitive 3.56 (1.15) 3.68 (.94)
 Minimizing 4.02 (1.05) 4.10 (.97)
 Personal distress 2.90 (1.06) 3.21 (1.14)
Child characteristics
 Age (months at T1) 44.91 (7.08) 43.17 (7.49)
 Sex (girl) 82 (58) 14 (70)

Note. HS = High school; T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2; PRD = Parental response to child distress. Missing data: Mother’s age, n = 0; Education, n = 3; Race, n = 8; Marital status, n = 1; T1 attachment style, n = 1; T1 unsupportive PRD, n = 2; Child’s age, n = 0; Child’s sex, n = 3.