Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 21;36(5):498–506. doi: 10.37201/req/033.2023

Table 1.

Conditional probability for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection depending on the prevalence in different settings presuming a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 99%, LR +/- 89/0.11 (RT-PCR)[5] and sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 99%, LR +/- 56/0.44 (Ag-RDT) [10].

Prevalence in 2020
1% 2% 5% 10% 15% 25% 35% 50%
Population screenings in the Basque Country [15] Primary Care Centres
in Valencia [16]
Staff members Residents Hospital Emergency Service
Nursing Homes in Barcelona [17] HUA Vitoria-Gasteiz [18]
Sensitivity/
Specificity (%)
If positive (+) result Post-test probability (%)
89/99 (RT-PCR) Infection P (PPV)
No infection P (1-PPV)
47 (8-90)
53 (10-92)
64 (19-93)
35 (6-81)
82 (41-97)
17 (3-59)
91 (60-98)
9 (1.5-40)
94 (70-99)
6 (1-30)
97 (81-99.5)
3 (0.5-19)
98 (86-100)
2 (0.3-14)
99 (90-99.9)
1 (0.1-10)
56/99 (Ag-RDT) Infection P (PPV)
No infection P (1-PPV)
36 (4-88)
64 (12-96)
53 (11-91)
47 (9-89)
75 (29-95)
25 (4-71)
86 (48-98)
14 (2-52)
91 (59-98)
9 (1.5-41)
95 (72-99)
5 (0.7-28)
97 (79-100)
2 (0.3-14)
98 (85-100)
1.8 (0.2-15)
If negative (-) result Post-test probability (%)
89/99 (RT-PCR) Infection P (1- NPV)
No infection P (NPV)
0.1 (0-4)
99.9 (96-100)
0.2 (0-4)
99.8 (96-100)
0.6 (0.1-5)
99.4 (95-100)
1.2 (0.2-6)
98.8 (94-99.8)
1.9 (0.5-7)
98.1 (92-99.5)
3.6 (1-10)
96.4 (90-99)
6 (2-14)
94 (86-98)
10 (4-21)
90 (79-95)
56/99 (Ag-RDT) Infection P (1- NPV)
No infection P (NPV)
0.4 (0-5)
99.6 (95-100)
0.9 (0.1-5)
99.1 (95-100)
2.3 (0.7-8)
97.7 (92-99)
5 (2-11)
95 (89-98)
7 (3-14)
93 (85-96)
13 (7-22)
87 (78-93)
19 (12-29)
81 (71-88)
31 (21-42)
69 (58-79)

P: probability; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; LR +/-: Positive/negative likelihood ratio.

The probability of having the infection whether the result is positive or negative is expressed in % (95% CI). In bold, 1-NPV < 5% (threshold for ruling out infection). HUA: Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz.