Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):5112–5121. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1263

Table 2. Comparison of biosensing-based strategies for detecting cardiac troponin I.

Type Materials Detection limit (pg/mL) Detection range (pg/mL) Reference
Electrochemical biosensor
   Voltammetric type Apt-CES-GO/SPE 0.6 1–106 (23)
   Potentiometric type Ab-DE-COOH/cTn I/AuNP/SPGE 7.3 1–105 (7)
   EIS Ab-NH2-MIL-88B(Fe2Co)-MOF/NF 0.013 10−4–105 (8)
   ECL method BSA/Ab-AgNPs/CdS@MOF-5/PDDA/FTO 0.005 0.01–103 (9)
   FET APTES/glutaraldehyde-modified SiNW-FET 16 25–500 (26)
Colorimetric method GP/MOF-818@p-WO3/c-DNA/apt-glu aptasensor 0.018 0.05–105 (28)
Chemiluminescence method AuNP-(ald)HRP-Ab conjugate 5.6 1–104 (32)
Fluorescence method PEI-PPD FCNPs 190 5×103–1.8×105 (34)
Digital immunoassay method AuNPs/microfluidic chip 6.2 (35)
SERS Fe3O4@PEI/Ag NC-Apt 0.23 1–105 (39)
SPR chromium film/gold film/fiber 0.0575 (41)

EIS, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; ECL, electrochemiluminescence; FET, field-effect transistor; SERS, surface-enhanced Raman scattering; SPR, surface plasmon resonance.