Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 31;16(11):501–513. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09863-x

Table 1.

Intra-articular injections for the treatment of FAIS

Author Primary intervention Comparator Study design N Outcome measure Follow-up (months) Results AEs Conclusion
Abate et al. 2014 2 HA injections spaced out 40 days (0,6 mos) None Prospective cohort 23 Pain score, LISOH, mHHS, NSAID use 6, 12 Pain decreased at 6 and 12 months; LISOH decreased, mHHS improved at 12-month NSAID consumption reduced Two local side effects HA is safe and effective in the treatment of mild FAI, with significant pain reduction and functional improvement
Park et al. 2013 IA triamcinolone None Case series 3 VAS, OHS 0.5, 1, 2, 3 OHS scores for all patients decreased at 3 months None IA steroid reduced the pain and improved function in 3 cases of FAI
Krych et al. 2014 IA methyl-prednisolone acetate, triamcinolone, or betamethasone None Case series 54 NRS 0.5, 1.5 NRS decreased from post-injection anesthetic phase to 14 days. At 14 days, 20 patients, and at 6 weeks, 3 patients had clinically significant pain reduction ND Six percent of patients had sustained pain relief at 6 weeks. IA CSI has limited clinical benefit as a therapeutic modality
Lee et al. 2016 HA injections (Hyruan plus Inj 2 ml/syringe) IA CSI (triamcinolone) Randomized crossover trial 30 NRS, HOOS, Oral medication 3 Seventeen patients w/o crossover, HOOS at 2 weeks improved w/ HA injection. Thirteen patients w/ crossover, NRS improved at 2 weeks w/ 1st TA injection w/o difference in HOOS. At 4 weeks, decrease of NRS was greater w/ 1st HA and 2nd TA injections; HOOS improved greater in 1st HA and 2nd TA injections 8-facial flushing, menstrual irregularity, local site, effects IA CSI had faster effect in pain relief. IA HA group had delayed effect in functional improvement
Pennock et al. 2018 Initial trial of rest, PT, activity modification followed by IA triamcinolone, followed by arthroscopic surgery None Prospective cohort 93 Return to sport, mHHS, NAHS 12,24 Seventy percent responded to conservative measures 12% required CSI; 18% required surgery. All groups saw similar improvements in mHHS and NAHS. Cam and cam-pincer were 4 × more likely to require surgical intervention ND Eighty-two percent of adolescent patients with FAI can be managed non-operatively, with significant improvements in outcome scores at a mean follow-up of 2 years
Ebert et al. 2023 IA triamcinolone w/ 12-week rehabilitation program None Case series 44 iHOT, HOS, mHHS, Tegner, VAS-S, ROM, Isometric strength 4, 6, 12, 24 31.8% of patients progressed to surgical intervention over the 24-month post-injection period. In the non-operative cohort, a significant improvement in all patient-reported outcome measures were observed, with 93% satisfaction None Although 32% of patients progressed to surgery, significant improvement in hip pain, symptoms, and physical function was observed in patients because of a targeted non-operative management
Hunt et al. 2012 Diagnostic IA triamcinolone + lidocaine None Prospective observational outcomes study 52

NPRS, SF-12

mHHS, WOMAC NAHS, Baecke Questionnaire of Habitual Activity

3, 12 Twenty-three (44%) of patients reported satisfaction with conservative care. 56% chose to have surgery. Both groups demonstrated equally significant improvement in all outcome measures from baseline to 1 year ND A trial of conservative management for persons with prearthritic, intra-articular hip disorders should be considered before engaging in surgical intervention
De Luigi et al. 2019 IA LR-PRP None Prospective cohort 8 VAS, HHS 0.5, 1.5, 2 Statistically significant improvements in VAS were seen with both rest and activity at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks after PRP injection None Ultrasound-guided PRP injections hold promise as an emerging technique toward symptom relief, reducing pain, and improving function in patients with hip labral tears

HA hyaluronic acid, mos months, IA intra-articular, mL milliliter, LR leukocyte rich, PRP platelet-rich plasma, CSI corticosteroid injection, LISOH Lequesne Index for Severity of Osteoarthritis of the Hip, mHHS modified Hip Harris Score, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, VAS Visual Analog Scale, OHS Oxford Hip Score, NRS Numerical Rating Scale, HOOS Hip Disabilities and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, NAHS Non-arthritic Hip Score, iHOT International Hip Outcome Tool, HOS Hip Outcome Score, ROM range of motion, NPRS Numerical Pain Rating Scale, SF-12 12 Item Short Form Survey, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index