Table 3.
Risk of bias assessment overview
| Reference | Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 | Item 4 | Item 5 | Item 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnett et al. [67] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Britton et al. [104] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Chagas and Batista [106] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Chagas and Batista [107] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Chagas and Batista [79] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Chagas and Batista [95] | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Chagas and Marinho [103] | ? | ✓ | ✕ | ? | ? | ? |
| Chagas et al. [96] | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Chagas et al. [105] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ? |
| Chang et al. [92] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chen and Housner [77] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
| De Meester et al. [36] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| Deprez et al. [80] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Estevan et al. [98] | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ? | ✓ | ? |
| Estevan et al. [68] | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Fu and Burns [121] | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Gísladóttir et al. [108] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Gísladóttir et al. [57] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gu et al. [93] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Gu et al. [94] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ? |
| Hands et al. [74] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Haugen et al. [88] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Herrmann and Seelig [109] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Huhtiniemi et al. [99] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hulteen et al. [110] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Huotari et al. [58] | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ? |
| Jaakkola et al. [87] | ✕ | ? | ✕ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Jaakkola and Washington [112] | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Jaakkola et al. [114] | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Jaakkola et al. [111] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Jaakkola et al. [113] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Jekauc et al. [115] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✕ | ✓ |
| Kalaja et al. [55] | ? | ? | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ? |
| Kalaja et al. [85] | ✕ | ? | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| Kokstejn et al. [97] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
| Kovac et al. [101] | ? | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Kramer et al. [86] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Lloyd et al. [118] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Lopes et al. [116] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Lubans et al. [66] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? |
| McGrane et al. [70] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| McGrane et al. [75] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| McGrane et al. [117] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Nikolaos [69] | ? | ? | ✕ | ? | ✕ | ? |
| Nunez-Gaunaurd et al. [84] | ✕ | ? | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| O’Brien et al. [91] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Okely et al. [73] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| Okely et al. [71] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ? |
| Philpott et al. [76] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| Philpott et al. [102] | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pichardo et al. [72] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✕ |
| Pullen et al. [100] | ? | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rigoli et al. [81] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? |
| Rogers et al. [89] | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ✕ | ✓ |
| Ryan et al. [82] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smith et al. [119] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ✕ |
| Smith et al. [83] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ? |
| Sommerfield et al. [120] | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tadiotto et al. [56] | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Vedul-Kjelsas et al. [90] | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Woods et al. [78] | ? | ? | ✕ | ? | ? | ✓ |
✓ indicates a low risk of bias, ✕ indicates a high risk of bias, ? indicates an inadequate or unclear description
Item 1 = Does the study adequately describe participant sampling procedures and inclusion criteria?
Item 2 = Does the study clearly outline the motor competence assessment(s) used (specific measures/procedures/valid)?
Item 3 = Does the study provide acceptable reliability information for the motor competence assessment(s) used?
Item 4 = Does the study clearly outline the physical activity/physical fitness/psychosocial assessment(s) used (specific measures/procedures/valid)?
Item 5 = Does the study provide acceptable reliability information for the physical activity/physical fitness/psychosocial assessment(s) used?
Item 6 = Of those who consented to the study, did an adequate proportion have complete data for the motor competence and the physical activity/physical fitness/psychosocial assessments?