Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1998 Aug;42(8):2109–2112. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.8.2109

Effects of Mutations in GrlA of Topoisomerase IV from Staphylococcus aureus on Quinolone and Coumarin Activity

Bénédicte Fournier 1, David C Hooper 1,*
PMCID: PMC105875  PMID: 9687416

Abstract

The grlA genes of Staphylococcus aureus ISP794 (wild type), MT5224c4 (grlA [Phe-80]), MT5224c2 (grlA [Pro-116]), and MT111 (grlA [Glu-116]) were cloned in pSK950, a shuttle vector, and introduced into S. aureus strains derived from strain RN4220. The mutations at position 116 of GrlA (Ala→Pro or Glu) caused an increase in the level of fluoroquinolone resistance and a decrease in the level of coumarin susceptibility, whereas the mutation at position 80 (Ser→Phe) caused only an increase in the level of fluoroquinolone resistance. In multicopy alleles, both types of mutations were codominant for fluoroquinolone resistance, and mutations at position 116 were also codominant for coumarin resistance.


Bacterial DNA type II topoisomerases (DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV) catalyze the modification of the topological state of DNA in cells. Topoisomerase IV appears to have a particular role in decatenation of daughter chromosomes (18). These enzymes are composed of two subunits which form A2B2 tetramers composed of GyrA and GyrB subunits in the case of DNA gyrase and GrlA (ParC in Escherichia coli) and GrlB (ParE in E. coli) subunits in the case of topoisomerase IV in Staphylococcus aureus. For both enzymes, the A subunit is responsible for DNA breakage and reunion (10), while the B subunit catalyzes the hydrolysis of ATP (5). DNA gyrase is the target of several antibiotics. The fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, inhibit the DNA breakage-reunion cycle by binding to the gyrase-DNA complex. The coumarins, such as novobiocin and coumermycin, act by inhibiting ATP hydrolysis mediated by the GyrB subunit of DNA gyrase. Topoisomerase IV is also the target of several fluoroquinolones (6, 8). The action of coumarins on topoisomerase IV has been demonstrated by showing the inhibition of the activity of the purified enzyme by novobiocin (2, 12) and by showing the increased coumarin susceptibility of a mutant with an altered GrlB subunit (Asn470Asp) (7). No mutations in GrlB homologous to those in the GyrB subunit that cause coumarin resistance have been reported.

The novel phenotype of quinolone resistance and coumarin hypersusceptibility of the GrlB (Asn470Asp) mutant was postulated to be due to a novel mechanism, possibly associated with altered catalytic function (7). We showed in the study described here that certain GrlA mutations also exhibit this phenotype. This class of GrlA mutations, in contrast to those localized in the common quinolone resistance-determining region, is closer to the active site of enzyme breakage of DNA, suggesting possible effects on enzyme function. The dominance of these mutations was also studied and was found to be similar to that of the GrlB (Asn470Asp) mutation.

In vitro mutants from strain MT5.

The strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Strain MT5 carries the nov-142 locus (gyrB [Ile102Ser and Arg144Ile]), which is responsible for high-level resistance to coumarins (7). Some mutants of MT5 selected with ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin showed mutations in GrlA at position 80 or 116 (Table 2) (11, 14). For both kinds of mutants an increase in the level of fluoroquinolone resistance was observed, but only mutants carrying the mutation at position 116 exhibited a slight but reproducible decrease in the level of novobiocin resistance (twofold) (Table 2). In order to study the effects of these mutations on novobiocin susceptibility, cloning of the different grlA genes was done.

TABLE 1.

S. aureus strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Genotype or characteristica Source or reference
Strains
 ISP2133 8325 pig-131 trp-489 Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 14
 MT5224c4 8325 pig-131 nov (gyrB142) hisG15 flqA (grlA542) 14
 MT5224c2 8325 pig-131 nov (gyrB142) hisG15 flqA (grlA552) 11
 MT111 8325 pig-131 hisG15 flqA (grlA548) 14
 EN1 8325 pig-131 nov (gyrB142) hisG15 flqA (grlA542) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 11
 BF3 8325 pig-131 hisG15 flqA (grlA548) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 This study: ISP2133 DNA × MT111
 BF4 8325 pig-131 nov (gyrB142) hisG15 flqA (grlA552) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 This study: ISP2133 DNA × MT5224c2
 RN4220 8325-4 r 9
 EN20 RN4220 flqA (grlA542) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 11
 BF5 RN4220 flqA (grlA548) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 This study: BF3 DNA × RN4220
 BF6 RN4220 flqA (grlA552) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 This study: BF4 DNA × RN4220
 BF2 RN4220 nov (gyrB142) 7
 BF7 RN4220 nov (gyrB142) flqA (grlA552) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 This study: BF4 DNA × BF2
 BF8 RN4220 nov (gyrB142) flqA (grlA548) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 This study: BF3 DNA × BF2
 BF9 RN4220 nov (gyrB142) flqA (grlA542) Ω(chr::Tn917lac)2 This study: EN1 DNA × BF2
Plasmids
 pSK950 10.5-kb plasmid carrying the attP site of phage L54a, replicon of pSC101, Spr (E. coli) and temperature-sensitive replicon of pE194, Tcr (S. aureus) G. L. Archer
 pSKISA 2.7-kb BamHI fragment containing the grlA gene from ISP794 cloned into pSK950 This study
 pSKMTA 2.7-kb BamHI fragment containing the grlA gene from MT111 cloned into pSK950 This study
 pSKC2A 2.7-kb BamHI fragment containing the grlA gene from MT5224c2 cloned into pSK950 This study
 pSKC4A 2.7-kb BamHI fragment containing the grlA gene from MT5224c4 cloned into pSK950 This study
 pBFISA 100-bp EcoRI fragment containing the promoter of grlB cloned into pSKISA This study
 pBFMTA 100-bp EcoRI fragment containing the promoter of grlB cloned into pSKMTA This study
 pBFC2A 100-bp EcoRI fragment containing the promoter of grlB cloned into pSKC2A This study
 pBFC4A 100-bp EcoRI fragment containing the promoter of grlB cloned into pSKC4A This study
a

Sp, spectinomycin, Tc, tetracycline. 

TABLE 2.

Activities of ciprofloxacin and novobiocin against mutants of MT5

Mutant strain Amino acid mutation in GrlA MIC (μg/ml)
Ciprofloxacin Novobiocin
MT5 0.25 40.0
MT5224c4 Ser80Phe 2.0 40.0
MT52222 Ser80Phe 2.0 40.0
MT5224c2 Ala116Pro 2.0 20.0
MT52184 Ala116Pro 4.0 20.0
MT5224c3 Ala116Glu 2.0 20.0

Cloning of grlA genes.

The grlA genes of strain ISP794 (wild-type), MT5224c4 (grlA [Phe-80]), MT5224c2 (grlA [Pro-116]), and MT111 (grlA [Glu-116]) were amplified by PCR with Vent DNA polymerase and primers containing a BamHI site as described previously (7). The PCR product was cloned into the BamHI site of pGEM3-zf(+). In order to verify that no mutation was introduced by the polymerase, the sequences of the entire grlA gene for each allele were determined, and no changes were found. The grlA genes were then subcloned into the BamHI site of pSK950, a shuttle vector carrying the thermosensitive replicon of plasmid pE194 from S. aureus. Plasmids pSKISA (grlA+), pSKC2A (grlA [Pro-116]), pSKC4A (grlA [Phe-80]), and pSKMTA (grlA [Glu-116]) were obtained (Table 1). pSKC4A (grlA [Phe-80]) was introduced into wild-type strain S. aureus RN4220 (r), and pSKISA (grlA+) was introduced into S. aureus EN20 (a derivative of RN4220 with the grlA [Phe-80] mutation on the chromosome) (11). MICs were measured with Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with serial twofold increasing concentrations of drugs, and the cells were grown at 30°C. Unexpectedly, for cells carrying pSKISA and pSKC4A the MICs were similar in comparison to the MICs for cells containing the vector plasmid alone (data not shown), suggesting that the grlA genes were not expressed. The region that was amplified by PCR included the putative promoter previously described by Yamagishi et al. (17). Thus, this promoter appears to be weak or inefficient, suggesting that expression of grlA is dependent on the promoter of grlB, which is upstream of grlA. The initiation codon of grlA overlaps the stop codon of grlB (6, 17).

In order to express the grlA genes, a 100-bp fragment containing the grlB promoter was amplified by PCR with primers containing an EcoRI site (primer 5′-ATA TAT GGA ATT CAG CTA TGA AAG T-3′, with the 5′ nucleotide at position 264 in the oligonucleotide coordinates used by Yamagishi et al. [17], and primer 5′-ATG AAT TCG GCA CCT GCA AAC GTA-3′ [position 379]) and was cloned into the EcoRI site of pGEM3-zf(+). This fragment was also subcloned into the EcoRI site of the previously constructed pSK950 derivatives containing different grlA alleles, pSKISA, pSKC2A, pSKC4A, and pSKMTA. The EcoRI site of pSK950 is localized 10 bp upstream of the BamHI site. The obtained plasmids were pBFISA (grlA+), pBFC2A (grlA [Pro-116]), pBFC4A (grlA [Phe-80]), and pBFMTA (grlA [Glu-116]) (Table 1).

Expression of grlA genes in multicopy alleles.

The plasmids with the mutated grlA genes (pBFMTA, pBFC2A, and pBFC4A) were introduced into strain RN4220. Strains derived from RN4220 carried the three different alleles and were obtained by transformation of high-molecular-weight chromosomal DNA as described previously (13): EN20 (grlA [Phe-80]), BF5 (grlA [Pro-116]), and BF6 (grlA [Glu-116]). The plasmid with the wild-type gene (pBFISA) was introduced into each of these strains. The MICs were determined and are presented in Table 3. First, for BF6 and BF5, which carry the mutation at position 116 on the chromosome, the MICs of fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin) were increased (two- to eightfold) and the MICs of coumarins (novobiocin and coumermycin) were decreased (fourfold) in comparison to the MICs for the parent strain RN4220. Second, when the plasmids carrying the mutated grlA genes were introduced into wild-type strain RN4220, an increase in the fluoroquinolone MICs was observed. In addition, RN4220 carrying pBFMTA (grlA [Glu-116]) and pBFC2A (grlA [Pro-116]) exhibited decreased levels of resistance to coumarins (two- to fourfold), in contrast to RN4220 carrying pBFC4A (grlA [Phe-80]), for which no change in the coumarin MICs was found. For the merodiploids of mutant strains EN20, BF5, and BF6 containing plasmid pBFISA (grlA+), the opposite effects were observed: decreases in the fluoroquinolone MICs for all strains and increases in the coumarin MICs only for BF5 and BF6 (Table 3). These results confirmed that the mutation at position 116 is responsible for the quinolone resistance and the coumarin hypersusceptibility phenotype of these mutants.

TABLE 3.

Susceptibility patterns of S. aureus gyrB+ strains diploid for grlA

Strain/plasmid grlAa
MIC (μg/ml)b
Chromosome Plasmid Ciprofloxacin Norfloxacin Novobiocin Coumermycin
RN4220/pSK950 Wild None 0.5 1.0 0.16 0.02
RN4220/pBFMTA Wild Ala116Glu 1.0 4.0 0.08 0.01
RN4220/pBFC2A Wild Ala116Pro 1.0 4.0 0.04 0.01
RN4220/pBFC4A Wild Ser80Phe 1.0 8.0 0.16 0.02
BF6/pSK950 Ala116Glu None 1.0 8.0 0.04 0.01
BF6/pBFISA Ala116Glu Wild 0.25 1.0 0.08 0.01
BF5/pSK950 Ala116Pro None 1.0 8.0 0.04 0.01
BF5/pBFISA Ala116Pro Wild 0.25 1.0 0.08 0.01
EN20/pSK950 Ser80Phe None 2.0 16.0 0.16 0.02
EN20/pBFISA Ser80Phe Wild 0.25 1.0 0.16 0.01
a

Wild, wild-type gene; none, plasmid vector only. 

b

The MICs are the mean values for at least three different transformants. 

In our previous study, the coumarin hypersusceptibility phenotype of a grlB mutant was also seen in the gyrB142 (coumarin resistant) genetic background. To determine if this effect was also seen with the grlA mutations at position 116, the plasmids were then introduced into strains carrying the gyrB142 allele (nov-142). These strains were obtained by introducing the different grlA alleles into strain BF2 (gyrB [Ile102Ser and Arg144Ile]) (Table 1). The results, presented in Table 4, obtained for fluoroquinolone resistance were similar to the results observed for strain RN4220 (gyrB+). For coumarin resistance, the presence of plasmids pBFC2A (grlA [Pro-116]) and pBFC4A (grlA [Glu-116]) in BF2 also increased the level of susceptibility to novobiocin and coumermycin (fourfold). Conversely, pBFISA (grlA+) increased by fourfold the coumarin MICs for strains carrying the mutation at position 116 (BF7 and BF8). These results confirmed that the mutations in grlA at position 116 are responsible for decreasing the level of susceptibility to coumarins either in a gyrB+ or in a gyrB142 background, whereas the mutation grlA (Phe-80) only modifies fluoroquinolone susceptibility.

TABLE 4.

Susceptibility patterns of S. aureus RN4220 gyrB142 strains diploid for grlAa

Strain/plasmid grlAb
MIC (μg/ml)c
Chromosome Plasmid Ciprofloxacin Norfloxacin Novobiocin Coumermycin
BF2/pSK950 Wild None 0.5 1.0 20.0 5.0
BF2/pBFMTA Wild Ala116Glu 1.0 4.0 5.0 1.25
BF2/pBFC2A Wild Ala116Pro 1.0 4.0 5.0 1.25
BF2/pBFC4A Wild Ser80Phe 1.0 4.0 10.0 2.5
BF7/pSK950 Ala116Glu None 1.0 8.0 5.0 1.25
BF7/pBFISA Ala116Glu Wild 0.25 0.5 20.0 5.0
BF8/pSK950 Ala116Pro None 1.0 4.0 5.0 1.25
BF8/pBFISA Ala116Pro Wild 0.25 0.5 20.0 5.0
BF9/pSK950 Ser80Phe None 2.0 8.0 20.0 5.0
BF9/pBFISA Ser80Phe Wild 0.25 0.5 20.0 5.0
a

BF2, BF7, BF8, and BF9 carry the double-mutation (Ser102 and Ile144) gyrB gene. 

b

Wild, wild-type gene; none, plasmid vector only. 

c

The MICs are the mean values for at least three different transformants. 

Determination of dominance.

Our results also indicate that both mutations in grlA are codominant for quinolone resistance in multicopy alleles (Table 3 and 4). The codominance of fluoroquinolone resistance was also observed for mutations in grlB (7), parC (in E. coli, equivalent to grlA) (8), and parE (in E. coli, equivalent to grlB) (3). For coumarin hypersusceptibility, mutation at position 116 is codominant in multicopy alleles in both gyrB+ and gyrB142 backgrounds, as described previously for the mutation grlB (Asp470) (7). Thus, the grlB mutation and grlA mutations at position 116 are also epistatic for the coumarin resistance of GyrB.

Implications for mechanisms of quinolone resistance.

Mutations at positions 80 and 116 of GrlA probably have different mechanisms of quinolone resistance. In the crystal structure of a fragment of the GyrA subunit from E. coli (10), Ser83, which is homologous to Ser80 of GrlA, and other previously described quinolone resistance mutations in GyrA, which have not been associated with alterations in coumarin susceptibility, are clustered on a negatively charged surface that bridges the upper (or head) interface of the two subunit monomers. Modeling suggests that this surface is a principal site of binding of the “gate” strand of DNA, which is broken and resealed by enzyme action. The model further predicts that DNA distortion is required for interaction of the active-site tyrosine residues (Tyr122 in E. coli GyrA and Tyr119 in S. aureus GrlA) with the target phosphoryl residues of DNA during initial DNA cleavage. The residues of the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) are localized in the area where this distortion is predicted to occur, suggesting that the binding of quinolones to the gyrase-DNA complex may occur in this region. The finding that complexes of DNA and gyrase reconstituted with a resistant GyrA (Ser83Trp) subunit exhibit substantially reduced levels of quinolone binding (16) is consistent with this model. The catalytic activity of topoisomerase IV reconstituted with GrlA (Ser80Tyr) has also been shown to be similar to that of the wild-type enzyme (2). Thus, the Ser80Phe mutation in GrlA, which is homologous to Ser83 of GyrA, also likely confers resistance by causing a reduction in the level of binding of quinolones to the enzyme-DNA complex and is predicted to have normal or near normal catalytic efficiency.

Quinolone resistance mutations at position 116 of GrlA, in contrast, have an additional phenotype of coumarin hypersusceptibility. This phenotype was first reported in a GrlB (Asn470Asp) mutant (7). The localization of position 470 of GrlB, based on the crystal structure of the homologous yeast topoisomerase II (1), is distant from the homologous putative sites of quinolone binding in GrlA and GyrA, suggesting a distinct mechanism of quinolone resistance and one possibly associated with altered enzyme catalytic efficiency (7, 15). GrlA116 mutations are also outside the previously defined QRDR and are close to the active site, Tyr119. In the E. coli GyrA structure, the Tyr122 residues at the head-dimer interface are at the periphery of the putative DNA-binding surface, the center of which contains Ser80 and other residues of the QRDR (10). Thus, these tyrosine residues may not themselves be involved in quinolone binding to the complex. The proximity of the mutations at position 116 to the amino acid that mediates DNA cleavage (Tyr119) further suggests that catalytic efficiency might also be affected. The replacement of Ala by Pro might be predicted to distort the helical structure in this region (α6 in the yeast structure) (1), and replacement by Glu would provide an additional negative charge in a region of positively charged residues and would thereby alter DNA binding, which these residues are thought to mediate. Conformational changes in the putative region of quinolone binding might also be envisioned to occur secondarily to the changes at position 116.

Future studies of drug binding and the catalytic activity of the mutant enzymes will be necessary to test the hypothesis that resistance in GrlB and GrlA116 mutants occurs by mechanisms distinct from alteration of a quinolone-binding site, but mutations in a domain homologous to that harboring the mutation in GrlB cause amsacrine resistance in yeast topoisomerase II (15). If impaired enzyme function mediates quinolone resistance and coumarin hypersusceptibility in our S. aureus GrlB and GrlA116 mutants, then this impairment is insufficient to alter the growth of either mutant under laboratory conditions (7) (data not shown). Normal growth patterns, however, have been described for coumarin-resistant gyrB mutants of E. coli that exhibit impaired gyrase function (4).

In conclusion, the mutations at position 116 of GrlA (Ala→Pro or Glu) cause an increase in the level of fluoroquinolone resistance and a decrease in the level of coumarin susceptibility, whereas the mutation at position 80 (Ser→Phe) causes only an increase in the level of fluoroquinolone resistance. Both types of mutations are codominant for fluoroquinolone resistance in multicopy alleles.

Acknowledgments

We thank G. L. Archer for providing plasmid pSK950.

This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant AI23988 (to D.C.H.) from the National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Berger J M, Gamblin S J, Harrison S C, Wang J C. Structure and mechanism of DNA topoisomerase II. Nature (London) 1996;379:225–232. doi: 10.1038/379225a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blanche F, Cameron B, Bernard F-X, Maton L, Manse B, Ferrero L, Ratet N, Lecoq C, Goniot A, Bish D, Crouzet J. Differential behaviors of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli type II DNA topoisomerases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2714–2720. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.12.2714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Breines D M, Ouabdesselam S, Ng E Y, Tankovic J, Shah S, Soussy C J, Hooper D C. Quinolone resistance locus nfxD of Escherichia coli is a mutant allele of the parE gene encoding a subunit of topoisomerase IV. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:175–179. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Contreras A, Maxwell A. gyrB mutations which confer coumarin resistance also affect DNA supercoiling and ATP hydrolysis by Escherichia coli DNA gyrase. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:1617–1624. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb00886.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Drlica K, Zhao X. DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:377–392. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.3.377-392.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferrero L, Cameron B, Manse B, Lagneaux D, Crouzet J, Famechon A, Blanche F. Cloning and primary structure of Staphylococcus aureus DNA topoisomerase IV: a primary target of fluoroquinolones. Mol Microbiol. 1994;13:641–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fournier B, Hooper D C. Mutations of topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase of Staphylococcus aureus: novel pleiotropic effects on quinolone and coumarin activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:121–128. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khodursky A B, Zechiedrich E L, Cozzarelli N R. Topoisomerase IV is a target of quinolones in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:11801–11805. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kreiswirth B N, Lofdalh S, Betley M J, O’Reilly M, Schlievert P M, Bergdoll M S, Novick R P. The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage. Nature (London) 1983;305:709–712. doi: 10.1038/305709a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morais Cabral J H, Jackson A P, Smith C V, Shikotra N, Maxwell A, Liddington R C. Crystal structure of the breakage-reunion domain of DNA gyrase. Nature (London) 1997;388:903–906. doi: 10.1038/42294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ng E Y, Trucksis M, Hooper D C. Quinolone resistance mutations in topoisomerase IV: relationship to the flqA locus and genetic evidence that topoisomerase IV is the primary target and DNA gyrase is the secondary target of fluoroquinolones in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1881–1888. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Peng H, Marians K J. Escherichia coli topoisomerase IV. Purification, characterization, subunit structure, and subunit interactions. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:24481–24490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stahl M L, Pattee P A. Confirmation of protoplast fusion-derived linkages in Staphylococcus aureus by transformation with protoplast DNA. J Bacteriol. 1983;154:406–412. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.406-412.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Trucksis M, Wolfson J S, Hooper D C. A novel locus conferring fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:5854–5860. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.18.5854-5860.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wasserman R A, Wang J C. Mechanistic studies of amsacrine-resistant derivatives of DNA topoisomerase II. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:20943–20951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Willmott C J R, Maxwell A. A single point mutation in the DNA gyrase A protein greatly reduces binding of fluoroquinolones to the gyrase-DNA complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:126–127. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yamagishi J-I, Kojima T, Oyamada Y, Fujimoto K, Hattori H, Nakamura S, Inoue M. Alterations in the DNA topoisomerase IV grlA gene responsible for quinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1157–1163. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zechiedrich E L, Khodursky A B, Cozzarelli N R. Topoisomerase IV, not gyrase, decatenates products of site-specific recombination in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2580–2592. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.19.2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES