Table 4.

Significance of All Pairwise Differences Between Strategies in Terms of Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Sensitivity Absolute Error (MS-AE), and Total Number of Presentations Per Test

			P
Reliability	Comparison		MAE	MS-AE	Total Presentations
Reliable	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.052	<0.001
	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, with spatial correlations	<0.001	0.894	<0.001
	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.006	<0.001
	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	ZEST, with spatial correlations	<0.001	0.250	<0.001
	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.882	<0.001
	ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.048	<0.001
High FPs	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.077	<0.001
	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, with spatial correlations	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	ZEST, with spatial correlations	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	<0.001	0.0280
High FNs	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.07	<0.001
	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, with spatial correlations	<0.001	0.066	<0.001
	S-ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	ZEST, with spatial correlations	<0.001	0.999	<0.001
	S-ZEST, without spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.127	<0.001
	ZEST, with spatial correlations	ZEST, without spatial correlations	<0.001	0.133	<0.001

These comparisons were calculated by using the average result of the simulation for each eye, so that the amount of simulations did not affect the significance of the P values. All comparisons were corrected for multiple discoveries using the Bonferroni–Holm method. The strategy on the left is generally the better performing of the two, with the exception of the MS-AE for the S-ZEST with spatial correlations in the presence of high FPs.