Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 20;15:137. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00742-z

Table 3.

Intervention effects in the total study group and the DS group, including a comparison of the experimental and control groups

Total Experimental Control Effect size [95% CI] p-value
Total group n = 83 n = 40 n = 43
GDS T0 11.5 (4.6) 12.1 (4.6) 11.0 (4.6) 0.22 [-0.21; 0.65] 0.31a
GDS T1 7.5 (4.6) 6.8 (3.9) 8.2 (5.1) -0.16 [-0.39; 0.09] 0.22b
ΔGDS 4.0 (3.7) 5.3 (3.1) 2.8 (3.9) 0.71 [ 0.26; 1.15] 0.002a
DS group n = 60 n = 30 n = 30
GDS T0 13.6 (3.5) 13.8 (3.9) 13.4 (3.1) -0.01 [-0.29; 0.28] 0.98b
GDS T1 8.7 (4.8) 7.4 (4.2) 10.0 (5.0) -0.56 [-1.07; -0.04] 0.03a
ΔGDS 4.9 (3.9) 6.3 (2.6) 3.4 (4.4) 0.81 [0.28; 1.34] 0.003a

Values are presented as mean (SD). DS group: group with depressive symptoms, SD: standard deviation, GDS T0: Geriatric Depression Scale before the intervention, GDS T1: Geriatric Depression Scale after the intervention, ΔGDS: mental health improvement; a according to unpaired t test (effect size given by Cohens); b according to Mann–Whitney U test (effect size given as rank biserial correlation)