Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 20;15:138. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00740-1

Table 6.

Leave one out sensitivity analysis

No. Analysis Meta-analysis
p-value
I2 Studies impacting the p-value upon removal P-value upon removal Figure
Between group (Absolute force accuracy: no comparator)
1. Overall 0.001 80% - No effect S19
2. Repeated measures designa < 0.001 80% - No effect S20
3. Cross-sectional design - - - - -
4. Elastic tape 0.009 83% - No effect S21
5. Rigid tape 0.069 77% - No effect S22
6. Healthy 0.044 78% Han [49] 0.109 S23
Hopper, Grisbrook [80] 0.080
Chang, Wang [82] 0.096
Lee, Kwon [83] 0.051
Chang, Chou [65] 0.104
7. Medial epicondylitis  < 0.001 0% - No effect S24
8. Lateral epicondylitis - - - - -
9. Functional ankle instability with fatigue - - - - -
10. Healthy (elastic tapes) 0.092 84% - No effect S25
11. Healthy (rigid tape) 0.123 0% - - S26
12. Medial epicondylitis (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 7
13. Lateral epicondylitis (rigid tape) - - - - -
14. Functional ankle instability with fatigue (elastic tape) - - - - -
Between group (Relative force accuracy: no comparator)
15. Overall 0.018 60% Hosseini, Salehi Dehno [68] 0.065 S27
Chang, Cheng [66] 0.056
16. Repeated measures designa 0.065 68% Chang, Wang [82] (healthy) 0.032 S28
17. Cross-sectional design - - - - -
18. Elastic tape Same as outcome number 15
19. Rigid tape - - - - -
20. Healthy 0.03 71% Hosseini, Salehi Dehno [68] 0.069 S29
Chang, Cheng [66] 0.117
Chang, Wang [82] 0.973
21. Medial epicondylitis 0.36 0% - No effect S30
22. Healthy (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 20
23. Medial epicondylitis (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 21
Between group (Absolute accuracy: placebo comparator)
24. Overall 0.01 55% Chang, Chou [65] 0.056 S31
25. Repeated measures designa Same as outcome number 24
26. Elastic tape Same as outcome number 24
27. Rigid tape - - - - -
28. Healthy 0.007 56% Chang, Chou [65] 0.089 S32
29. Medial epicondylitis 0.31 0% - No effect S33
30. Functional ankle instability (fatigue) - - - - -
31. Healthy (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 28
32. Medial epicondylitis (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 29
33. Functional ankle instability-fatigue (elastic tape) - - - - -
Between group (Relative accuracy: placebo comparator)
34. Overall 0.13 72% - No effect S34
35. Repeated measures designa Same as outcome number 34
36. Elastic tape Same as outcome number 34 - -
37. Rigid tape - - - - -
38. Healthy 0.12 81% - No effect S35
39. Medial epicondylitis 0.82 0% - No effect S36
40. Healthy (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 38
41. Medial epicondylitis (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 39
Within group (Absolute force accuracy)
42. Overall 0.11 74% - No effect S37
43. Repeated measures designa 0.15 80% - No effect S38
44. Quasi experimental design - - - - -
45. Elastic tape 0.42 0% - No effect S39
46. Rigid tape - - - - -
47. Functional ankle instability Same as outcome number 45
48. Healthy - - - - -
49. Lateral epicondylitis - - - - -
50. Functional ankle instability (elastic tape) Same as outcome number 45
51. Healthy (rigid tape) - - - - -
52. Lateral epicondylitis (rigid tape) - - - - -

aIncluding studies with case control repeated measures design