Table 5.
The association of DDS and FQS scores with F2a-IP level in all participants
Variables | B | SE | 95% Wald Confidence Interval (Lower, Upper) | P-value* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS | Model 1 | -16.69 | 6.46 | (-29.36, -4.02) | 0.01 |
Model 2 | -11.67 | 5.84 | (-23.13, -0.21) | 0.04 | |
FQS | Model 1 | -5.47 | 1.63 | (-8.67, -2.27) | 0.001 |
Model 2 | -4.30 | 1.68 | (-7.61, -0.99) | 0.01 |
DDS, dietary diversity score; FQS, food quality score
*P-value is based on linear regression analysis using GEE model (with identity link function and exchangeable correlation structure, and study groups were matched for age and BMI)
Model 1: Crude, Model 2: Adjusted for MET
Bold p-value (< 0.05) is considered as statistically significant