Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 16;72(11):1682–1691. doi: 10.2337/db23-0310

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards models and a proportional hazards competing risk model of the risk of kidney failure according to baseline shunt parameter (ω0) computed for the log-normal + shunt model and the isoporous + shunt model

Dextran sieving model n * HR (95% CI) P
Log-normal + shunt model
 Unadjusted 185 1.96 (1.52, 2.52) <0.0001
 Model 1 182 1.55 (1.17, 2.05) 0.0024
 Model 2 182 1.46 (1.09, 1.95) 0.0104
 Model 3 156 1.55 (1.13, 2.10) 0.0058
 Competing risk 182 1.53 (1.20, 1.94) 0.0006
Isoporous + shunt model
 Unadjusted 185 2.47 (1.88, 3.24) <0.0001
 Model 1 182 1.79 (1.30, 2.47) 0.0004
 Model 2 182 1.69 (1.22, 2.35) 0.0017
 Model 3 156 1.79 (1.25, 2.56) 0.0014
 Competing risk 182 1.69 (1.32, 2.18) <0.0001

The HRs and 95% CIs are expressed per 1-SD increment of ω0. Model 1 is adjusted for age, sex, MAP, HbA1c, GFR, and ACR. Model 2 is adjusted for model 1 covariates and diabetes duration. Model 3 is adjusted for model 1 covariates and PGLO and RA/RE ratio.

*

Number of participants with complete data for all covariates are shown for each model.

Sub-HR accounting for death as a competing risk is presented for a model adjusted for age, sex, MAP, HbA1c, GFR, and ACR.