TABLE 4.
JBI critical appraisal for studies reporting prevalence and incidence data.
| Citation | Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population? | Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way? | Was the sample size adequate? | Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample? | Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition? | Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants? | Was there appropriate statistical analysis? | Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately? | %Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berenguer Pérez M et al. 2019. | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | N | N/A | 62.50 |
| Goh OQ et al, 2020. | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N/A | 75.00 |
| Homs‐Romero E et al. 2021. | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N/A | 87.50 |
| Khan AF et al. 2013. | Y | U | U | Y | U | U | Y | N | U | 33.33 |
| Kreft D et al. 2020. | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N/A | 87.50 |
| Margolis DJ et al. 2002. | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | N/A | 75.00 |
| Moffatt CJ et al. 2004. | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | U | U | 66.67 |
| Rabe E et al. 2003. | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | 77.78 |
| Srinivasaiah N et al. 2007. | Y | Y | Y | N | U | N | N | U | U | 33.33 |
| Vowden KR et al. 2009. | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | N | U | Y | 66.67 |
| Zolotukhin IA et al. 2017. | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | 88.89 |
| Vuylsteke ME et al. 2018. | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | N | U | 66.67 |
| Baker SR et al. 1991. | Y | U | U | N | U | Y | Y | N | U | 33.33 |
| Laible J et al. 2002. | Y | U | Y | U | U | Y | Y | Y | U | 55.56 |
| Total | 92.85714286 | 78.57142857 | 78.57142857 | 64.28571429 | 57.14285714 | 78.57142857 | 50 | 28.57142857 | 33.33333333 | 64.98 |
Abbreviations: N, No; N/A, not applicable; U, Unclear; Y, Yes.