Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 17;9:e1587. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1587

Table 8. Percentage of coverage, cost saving, and time saving for RS, mono-objective and multi-objective approaches.

The bold values indicate the best results.

ID Metric Random search Mono-objective Multi-objectives
CS1 LC 44.1% 55.09% 54.6%
BC 50.24% 56.93% 49.5%
FC 51.16% 50.44% 54.39%
Cost −8.41% −6.11% −11.10%
Time −21.03% −13.29% −25.32%
CS2 LC 35.26% 90.88% 78.12%
BC 30% 69% 55%
FC 30% 90% 78%
Cost −37.58% −2.01% −60.39%
Time −51.05% −2.59% −46.35%
CS3 LC 12.85% 6.23% 12.92%
BC 8.87% 5.06% 8.29%
FC 12.51% 5.71% 13.08%
Cost −62.66% −44.89% −72.75%
Time −59.08% −51.80% −74.8%
CS4 LC 41.56% 74.21% 51.02%
BC 30% 56.47% 35.29%
FC 42.06% 73.1% 50.34%
Cost −40.96% 0.00% −30.09%
Time −63.70% 0.00% −36.29%
CS5 LC 15.85% 8.61% 17.43%
BC 9.71% 5.58% 11.87%
FC 9.38% 7.76% 20%
Cost −66.49% −79.62% −55.42%
Time −62.02% −76.68% −79.13%