. 2023 Jun 16;39(10):1963–1977. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02893-z

Table 3.

Inter- and intra-reader 4D-flow_AIM reproducibility data for the included studies in this systematic review

	Intra-reader reproducibility	Inter-reader reproducibility
Fidock et al. [20]	Excellent (CCC = 0.96)	Good (CCC = 0.86–0.96)
Juffermans et al. [25]	N/A	Moderate to Excellent (ICC 0.53–0.97)
Spampinato et al. [16]	Excellent (ICC = 0.98)	Excellent (ICC = 0.92–0.94)
Blanken et al. [22]	N/A	Moderate (r = 0.72)
Jacobs et al. [19]	Excellent (ICC = 0.97–0.98)	Excellent (ICC = 0.94–0.96)
Pruijssen et al. [8]	Good (ICC = 0.83)	Moderate (ICC = 0.73)
Kamphuis et al. [26]	Excellent (ICC = 0.98)	Excellent (ICC = 0.97)
Feneis et al. [23]	Excellent (ICC = 0.98–0.99)	Good to Excellent (ICC = 0.87–0.93)
Calkoen et al. [9]	Good to Excellent (ICC > = 0.77)	Good to Excellent (ICC > = 0.85)

Intra-reader reproducibility

Inter-reader reproducibility

Fidock et al. [20]

Excellent

(CCC = 0.96)

Good

(CCC = 0.86–0.96)

Juffermans et al. [25]

N/A

Moderate to Excellent

(ICC 0.53–0.97)

Spampinato et al. [16]

Excellent

(ICC = 0.98)

Excellent

(ICC = 0.92–0.94)

Blanken et al. [22]

N/A

Moderate

(r = 0.72)

Jacobs et al. [19]

Excellent

(ICC = 0.97–0.98)

Excellent

(ICC = 0.94–0.96)

Pruijssen et al. [8]

Good

(ICC = 0.83)

Moderate

(ICC = 0.73)

Kamphuis et al. [26]

Excellent

(ICC = 0.98)

Excellent

(ICC = 0.97)

Feneis et al. [23]

Excellent

(ICC = 0.98–0.99)

Good to Excellent

(ICC = 0.87–0.93)

Calkoen et al. [9]

Good to Excellent

(ICC > = 0.77)

Good to Excellent

(ICC > = 0.85)

r, sample correlation coefficient; CCC, concordance correlation coefficient; ICC, interclass correlation coefficient; N/A, no value indicated. (r ≥ 0.9, excellent correlation; r = 0.7–0.89, strong correlation; r = 0.4–0.7, moderate correlation; r = 0.1–0.39, weak correlation) (ICC ≥ 0.9, excellent correlation; ICC = 0.75–0.89, good correlation, ICC = 0.5–0.74, moderate correlation; ICC < 0.5, poor correlation).