Skip to main content
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal logoLink to Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
. 2023 Oct 13;21:5066–5072. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.024

Microbial fortification of pharmacological metabolites in medicinal plants

Xiaoxuan Wu a,b, Yu Yang a, Huiming Zhang a,c,d,
PMCID: PMC10589376  PMID: 37867972

Abstract

Medicinal plants are rich in secondary metabolites with beneficial pharmacological effects. The production of plant secondary metabolites is subjected to the influences by environmental factors including the plant-associated microbiome, which is crucial to the host’s fitness and survival. As a result, research interests are increasing in exploiting microbial capacities for enhancing plant production of pharmacological metabolites. A growing body of recent research provides accumulating evidence in support of developing microbe-based tools for achieving this objective. This mini review presents brief summaries of recent studies on medicinal plants that demonstrate microbe-augmented production of pharmacological terpenoids, polyphenols, and alkaloids, followed by discussions on some key questions beyond the promising observations. Explicit molecular insights into the underlying mechanisms will enhance microbial applications for metabolic fortification in medicinal plants.

Keywords: Medicinal plant, Microbiome, Beneficial microbe, Secondary metabolite, Terpenoid, Polyphenol, Alkaloid

1. Introduction

Plants produces a huge array of organic compounds, which can be classified into primary metabolites, secondary metabolites, and hormones, based on their assumed functions [1]. Secondary metabolites refer to the subset of metabolome that are not directly involved in basic functions of growth, development, and reproduction of the organisms, but can be important for long-term survival [2]. Plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) play crucial roles in plant defense, communication, and adaptation to the environment [3], such as the pathogen-induced sulfur-containing phytoalexins that function in plant defense [4], and the antioxidant polyphenols that function in plant acclimation to UV-B [5]. PSMs are mostly categorized as polyphenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids, based on their chemical structures and biosynthetic pathways [6]. Many plants produce PSMs with beneficial pharmacological effects, including therapeutic properties, on humans and other animals, and are therefore defined as medicinal plants, such as Artemisia annua L. that produces the anti-malaria artemisinin and Taxus brevifolia that produce the anti-cancer taxol widely used for clinical applications.

Plant production of secondary metabolites is subjected to the influences by many environmental factors, in addition to the intrinsic regulation by developmental programs [7]. Plants are naturally inhabited by a variety of epiphytic and endophytic microbes, which are collectively termed plant microbiome. While some microbes have no observable effects on plants, others can be either pathogens that cause detrimental effects on plants or beneficial species that promote plant growth and stress resistance [8], [9]. On one hand, the assembly of plant microbiome is shaped by the host via integrated regulation of morphological structures, exudation of secondary metabolites, and innate immune responses [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. On the other hand, the complex community of plant-associated microbes has been shown to be important for plant fitness, and is therefore suggested as an important target for agricultural and horticultural managements [15], [16], [17], [18].

Methods of enhancing plant production of pharmacological metabolites are of great importance and of intense interests. Given the importance of microbiome to plants, research interests are increasing regarding potential roles of plant-associated microbes in the production of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants [19], [20]. This mini review focuses on microbial fortification of pharmacological metabolites in medicinal plants. In addition to the emerging evidence that showed microbe-enhanced production of terpenoids that are mainly exemplified by mono-, di-, tri-, and tetra-terpenes, an overview of microbial influences on medicinal plants is provided regarding flavonoids and non-flavonoid polyphenols as well as alkaloids. Finally, we discuss key questions in this emerging research field including potential mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects, which will underpin microbial applications for metabolic fortification in medicinal plants.

2. Microbe-increased production of terpenoids

As the largest and structurally most diverse group of natural compounds, terpenes and their terpenoid derivatives (hereafter used interchangeably for simplicity) play major and various roles among the pharmacological PSMs [21], [22]. Based on the number of their 5-carbon isoprene units, most terpenoids are subgrouped into hemi- (C5), mono- (C10), sesqui- (C15), di- (C20), sester- (C25), tri- (C30), tetra- (C40), and polyterpenoids (C>40) [23], [24]. Recent studies of medicinal plants have highlighted important roles of microbes in the production of terpenoids, which are mainly exemplified by mono-, di-, tri-, and tetraterpenes (Table 1).

Table 1.

| Examples of medicinal plants in which pharmacological PSMs were enhanced by microbial treatments or correlated with (*) the plant microbiome.

Metabolites Microbes Plant tissue Plant species Reference
Monoterpene
α-pinene
β-pinene
α-thujene
β-myrcene
Streptomyces Strep-4 Leaves Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ [25]
Loganic acid Tetracladium (fungus) Roots Gentiana officinalis [30]*
Gentiopicroside,
Swertiamarine,
Sweroside
Polyangium Roots Gentiana siphonantha [30]*
(+)-Pulegone,
(−)-menthone
Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r Leaves Mentha piperita L. (Pepermint) [36]
α-terpineol,
Eugenol
Bacillus subtilis GB03 Leaves Ocimum basilicum L.
(Sweet basil)
[37]
Sesquiterpene
Germacrene D
β-caryophyllene
Bacteria pools isolated from roots Roots Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench [97]
Diterpene
Steviol glycosides Bacillus safensis STJP Leaves Stevia rebaudiana [41]
Steviol glycosides Enterobacter hormaechei H2A3 and H5A2 Leaves Stevia rebaudiana [42]
Andrographolide Micrococcus luteus ASd6 Leaves Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F) Nees [46]
Tanshinone Cladosporium tenuissimum DF11 (fungus) Roots Salvia miltiorrhiza [49]
Tanshinone Pseudomonas brassicacearum sub sp. neoaurantiaca Roots Salvia miltiorrhiza [50]
Triterpene and tetraterpene
Glycyrrhizic acid Rhodoplanes Roots Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch [52]*
Glycyrrhizic acid Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42, Roots Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch [55]
Astragaloside I, II, III Stenotrophomonas Roots Astragalus mongholicus [58]*
Astragaloside IV Bacteria consortium Roots Astragalus mongholicus [59]
Ginsenoside Paenibacillus polymyxa Roots Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer (Ginseng) [61]
Ginsenoside Bacillus sp. LB5–3 Roots Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer (Ginseng) [62]
Crocin, safranal Bacillus mojavensis CS4EB32
Burkholderia gladioli E39CS3
Flowers Crocus sativus L. (Saffron crocus) [65]
Polyphenols
Liquiritin Rhodoplanes Roots Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch [52]*
Liquiritin Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Roots Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch [55]
Calycosin-7-glucoside Phyllobacterium
Inquilnus
Roots Astragalus mongholicus [59]*
Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside
Kaempferol3,7-di-O-glucoside
Ruminococcaceae bacterium GD7 Roots Paeonia lactiflora Pall [71]*
Flavonoids Ruminococcaceae Leaves Ginkgo biloba [73]*
Piceatannol, kyotorphin Burkholderia ambifaria LK-P4 Leaves Anoectochilus roxburghii [75]
Flavonoids, total polyphenols Bacteria consortium Flowers Tagetes patula L. (French marigold) [76]
Alkannin/shikonin Labrys
Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium
Penicillium(fungus)
Roots Alkanna tinctoria L. [77]*
Alkannin/shikonin Chitinophaga sp.
Allorhizobium sp.
Duganella sp.
Micromonospora sp.
Roots Alkanna tinctoria L. [78]
Alkannin/shikonin and their derivatives Chitinophaga sp. R-73072
Xanthomonas sp. R-73098
Pseudomonas sp. R-71838
Roots Lithospermum officinale L. [79], [80]
Alkaloids
Matrine and Oxymatrine Actinobacteria phylum Roots Sophora flavescens [86]*
Aconitine Brevundimonas (bacteria)
Cladosporium (fungus)
Roots Aconitum vilmorinianum Komarov [87]*
Pyrroloquizoline alkaloids Azotobacter chroococcum
Pseudomonas putida
Roots Adhatoda vasica Nees [89]
Vinblastine and vincristine Pseudomonas fluorescens 169
Azospirillum brasilense Ab-101
Roots Catharanthus roseus L. [90]

2.1. Monoterpenes

Microbe-enhanced production of monoterpenes was recently identified as a major contributor to the geo-herbalism of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (CRP) [25], which is the dried ripe peel of Citrus reticulata Blanco or its cultivars and is used for clinical treatment of indigestion and inflammatory syndromes of the respiratory tract [25], [26]. Terpenes, known with antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, account for the majority of the essential oils that are important to the pharmacological quality of CRP [25], [27]. CRP quality had been known to be influenced by the citrus planting area, but how such influence occurs was unclear. Su et al. examined the essential oils of CRPs from C. reticulata grown in different geo-regions. A group of seven monoterpenes, including o-cymene, β-myrcene, α-pinene, β-pinene, δ-carene, α-thujene and α-terpinene, were identified as biomarkers that predicted the citrus planting area with an average accuracy of 82.86 %. Eight bacteria genera from the C. reticulata rhizosphere microbiome were then identified as showing significant positive correlations with five of these biomarkers. The microbial influences on monoterpene production were subsequently confirmed in C. reticulate treated with an isolated Streptomyces strain. Interestingly, a combination of this Streptomyces strain and an endophytic Serratia strain somewhat further increase the production of α-pinene, β-pinene and α-thujene in C. reticulate leaves, whereas the treatment with the Serratia strain alone showed similar levels of monoterpene production as the control plants [25], suggesting that the microbial enhancement of C. reticulate monoterpene production in the natural environment is an outcome from integrative actions at the microbiome level. As expected, the microbiome features are tightly correlated with the soil properties in the different geo-regions [25]. Similarly, geographic specificity was observed for both the microbiome and the sequiterpenoid contents of Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz., which is a herbaceous medicinal plant used in traditional Chinese medicine formulations to invigorate the spleen [28]. The microbial enhancement of C. reticulate monoterpene production was attributed to the higher expression levels of some genes related to terpenoid biosynthesis and modifications [25].

In addition to rhizosphere microbiome, endophytic microbial community can also be correlated with monoterpene production in medicinal plants, as shown in a recent study of the Gentiana species G. officinalis and G. siphonantha that are collectively known as Gentiana sect. Cruciata plants [29], [30]. Gentiana sect. Cruciata possesses anti-inflammatory, antifungal, antihistamine and antihepatotoxic activities, mainly due to the monoterpenes including gentiopicroside, loganic acid, swertiamarine and sweroside [29], [30], [31]. In G. officinalis and G. siphonantha collected from the same experimental field, the content of loganic acid was positively correlated with endophytic fungi of Tetracladium, unidentifed_Ascomycota_sp and unidentifed_Sebacinales_sp, while the contents of gentiopicroside, swertiamarine and sweroside were positively correlated with endophytic bacteria Polyangium [30]. Although it is unclear whether the correlations reflect the microbes’ chemotrophic preference to these plant metabolites, such a possibility does not exclude the other possibility that the correlations resulted from microbe-enhanced production of the monoterpenes. Both possibilities remain to be examined.

In a study of the medicinal plant Origanum vulgare L. ssp. vulgare and its endophytes, the bacterial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were found to contain monoterpenes, such as α-pinene and 3-carene that were also produced by the host plant [32], [33]. Nonetheless, microbial emission VOCs can be important mediators of the microbe-enhanced plant production of monoterpenes, as exemplified in the studies of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Peppermint is a medicinal herb traditionally used for treatments of fever, cold, digestive, anti-viral, anti-fungal and oral mucosa and throat inflammation [34]. Essential oils are among the major secondary metabolites responsible for the aroma effects of peppermint. The peppermint essential oils, which mainly consist of the monoterpenes menthol, menthone, neomenthol and iso-menthone, possess pharmacological effects such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and neuroprotective activities [35]. The VOCs emitted from a plant-beneficial Pseudomonas fluorescens strain was found to cause a 2-fold increase in the production of peppermint essential oils, among which the two major components, (+)-pulegone and (-)-menthone, showed increased biosynthesis in the P. fluorescens-treated plants [36]. Similarly, VOCs from a plant-beneficial Bacillus subtilis strain increased the two major essential oil components from the terpene-rich sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), alpha-terpineol and eugenol, by approximately 2- and 10-fold, respectively [37]. A recent study attributed the microbe-enhanced production of peppermint essential oils to the increased levels of the phytohormones jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA), as well as a higher density of glandular trichomes where the essential oils were produced [38]. Thus, it is an interesting question how certain microbial VOCs may trigger these in planta processes that lead to the enhanced production of monoterpenes.

2.2. Diterpenes

Steviol glycosides are a group of diterpene glycosides naturally present in only a few plant species, most notably Stevia rebaudiana [39], [40]. These plant metabolites possess various medicinal activities including antidiabetic, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer, and antidiarrheal activities, in addition to exhibiting a superior sweetener proficiency than sucrose and are noncaloric, noncariogenic, and nonfermentative [39], [40]. Certain bacteria strains isolated from either the rhizosphere or the endosphere of S. rebaudiana were recently shown to increase steviol glycosides contents in their host plants. Bacillus safensis STJP, a biocontrol strain isolated from the S. rebaudiana rhizosphere, suppressed the fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata and increased steviol glycosides contents in S. rebaudiana infected by A. alternata, especially when used in combination with the mycorrhiza Glomus fasciculatum ABTEC [41]. Treatments of S. rebaudiana with Enterobacter hormaechei strains H2A3 and H5A2, which were isolated from the S. rebaudiana endosphere, resulted in increased steviol glycosides contents and the transcript upregulation of the steviol glycosides biosynthesis genes including KO, KAH, UGT74G1, and UGT76G1 [42]. Interestingly, bacterial synthesis of rebaudioside A was observed for a strain of Pantoea vagans that was endophytic to S. rebaudiana seeds [43]. Thus, the microbe-increased accumulation of steviol glycosides in the S. rebaudiana plants might also be contributed directly by the presence of the microbes. On the other hand, microbial consumption of the plant-produced terpenoids may exist, as implied by the correlation between the expression levels of terpene synthesis genes in A. macrocephala rhizome and the abundance of the rhizome bacterial genes that are functionally related to terpenoid metabolism [44], [45].

Andrographolide from Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F) Nees is a diterpenoid lactone widely used in Indian medicine for snake bite and for the treatment of hepatitis. The Micrococcus luteus strain ASd6, which was isolated as an endophyte from A. paniculata, was shown to substantially enhance the andrographolide content in A. paniculata plants [46]. Tanshinones, a class of diterpenes synthesized and accumulate in the root periderm of Salvia miltiorrhiza, possess various pharmacological effects including anti-tumor properties [47], [48]. The endophytic fungus Cladosporium tenuissimum DF11, which was isolated from S. miltiorrhiza roots, was found to increase tanshinone levels via gene upregulation of a group of key enzymes in the tanshinone biosynthesis pathway [49]. Similarly, several S. miltiorrhiza endophytic bacteria strains significantly improved the activities of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutary1-CoA reductase and 1-deoxy-Dxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, which are two enzymes important for tanshinone biosynthesis, resulting in increases in tanshinone contents in the hairy roots [50]. In particular, S. miltiorrhiza treated with Pseudomonas brassicacearum sub sp. neoaurantiaca displayed increased dihydrotanshinone I and cryptotanshinone contents by 19-fold and 11-fold, respectively, while the total tanshinone contents increased 3.7-fold compared to the control. However, it should be noted that all the endophytic bacteria treatments also caused up to 55 % reductions in the biomass of S. miltiorrhiza root hairs [50].

2.3. Triterpenes and tetraterpenes

The medicinal plant Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch is widely used to treat multiple diseases, and its efficacy is largely attributed to liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid [51], [52]. Glycyrrhizic acid is a triterpenoide glycoside with multiple anti-cancer-related pharmacological activities [53], while liquiritin is a flavonoid that can be utilized to prevent inflammation and relieve pain [54]. An interesting phenomenon about G. uralensis is that wild plants produced significantly more liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid than cultivated plants [51], [52]. Comparative multi-omics analyses between the wild and cultivated G. uralensis revealed that the bacteria genus Lysobacter was remarkably more abundant in the cultivated plant rhizosphere than the wild plant rhizosphere, and that the expression of some key genes involved in liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid biosynthesis were strongly negatively correlated with the abundance of Lysobacter [51], [52]. In addition, the bacteria genus Rhodoplanes was found to be positively correlated with the accumulation of both liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid, as well as be more abundant in the rhizosphere of wild G. uralensis compared to cultivated plants [51], [52]. It remains unclear whether the chemical properties of the soil were different for the wild and cultivated G. uralensis plants, therefore, while the correlative observations suggest that the rhizosphere microbiome is important for the production of liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid in G. uralensis, such an inference may be confirmed by treating G. uralensis with the isolated bacteria strains. In another study, bacterial influences on the contents of liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid were observed with a Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain, which alleviates the drought stress-induced reduction of liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid contents in G. uralensis [55]. The alleviation was proposed to be mediated through the concomitantly increased JA accumulation in the bacteria-treated plants [55], but the hypothesis remains to be examined.

Bacteria-enhanced accumulation were also observed in two other groups of triterpene glycosides, namely astragalosides form Astragalus mongholicus and ginsenosides from Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer. The dried roots of A. mongholicus is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine used for immune stimulant, tonic, antioxidant, hepatoprotectant, diuretic, antidiabetic, anticancer, and expectorant effects [56]. The aqueous extract of A. mongholicus roots contains astragalosides as the major components with anti-cancer activities [57]. In a recent study, the contents of astragaloside I (Ast I), AstII, and AstIII were found to be positively correlated with the abundance of Stenotrophomonas in the A. mongholicus rhizosphere [58]. Microbial enhancement of astragaloside contents was directly demonstrated in A. mongholicus inoculated with a bacteria consortium, which increased the contents of astragaloside IV by 183.83 % and 164.97 % under moderate and severe drought stress, respectively [59]. Ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) is known for its ginsenosides used for the prevention and treatments of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases as well as for other pharmacological effects [60]. Inoculation of soil-grown ginseng plants with the foliar endophyte Paenibacillus polymyxa by means of foliar application combined with irrigation enhanced the plant concentration of ginsenosides [61]. Similarly, another ginseng foliar endophyte named LB 5–3 simultaneously increased biomass and ginsenoside accumulation in adventitious ginseng root culture [62]. These dual benefits are in contrast to the effects caused by exogenous application of the phytohormone JA, which reduced ginseng biomass in the root culture although it increased ginsenoside accumulation [63].

The tetraterpene compound crocin is one of the major apocarotenoids in the medicinal plant Crocus sativus L., of which the therapeutic properties are mostly attributed to its unique apocarotenoids with strong free radical scavenging activity [64]. A recent study of C. sativus endophytes showed that the plants were preferentially colonized by the genus Bacillus, followed by Burkholderia and Pantoea [65]. Two strains of the isolated endophytes, Bacillus mojavensis CS4EB32 and Burkholderia gladioli E39CS3, were shown to increase the expression of apocarotenoid biosynthetic genes in C. sativus [65], such as the phytoene synthase that carries out the first step in the carotenoid biosynthesis [66], and the beta-carotene hydroxylase that catalyzes β-carotene hydroxylation and generates the precursor of apocarotenoids [67]. Consistent with the gene induction, the endophyte treatments resulted in a marked increase in the concentration of apocarotenoids, including the tetraterpene crocin and safranal that is a monoterpene aldehyde [65].

3. Microbe-increased production of polyphenols

Polyphenols are phenolic compounds ranging from simple phenolic molecules to highly polymerized compounds [68]. These structurally diverse compounds are commonly subclassified into flavonoids, which have a structure based on or similar to that of flavone, and non-flavonoid polyphenols such as phenolic acids [69]. Polyphenols display a variety of health-promoting effects, such as antioxidant, antibacterial, cardio-protective, and anti-inflammatory [70].

Recent studies of polyphenols in medicinal plants have highlighted the roles of plant-beneficial microbes. In the two Paeonia lactiflora Pall cultivars Zifengyu and Hangbaishao, the flavonoids and phenolic acid contents were significantly higher in the former than the latter [71], and the differences were attributed to the root endophyte Ruminococcaceae bacterium GD7 that was significantly correlated with the levels of phenolic acid and flavonoids, including kaempferol-7-O-glucoside and kaempferol-3,7-di-O-glucoside [71], which possess antiproliferation effects on cancer cells [72]. Similarly, the flavonoid accumulation showed a positive correlation with the endophyte Ruminococcaceae in Ginkgo biloba [73]. In A. mongholicus, the bacteria genera Phyllobacterium and Inquilinus in the endosphere were positively correlated with the content of calycosin [58], a flavonoid that has therapeutic effects on a variety of diseases [74]. In Anoectochilus roxburghii that produces kyotorphin and piceatannol, the bacteria treatment with Burkholderia ambifaria LK-P4 increased the plant contents of these two phenolic compounds, which can significantly decrease blood glucose levels and protect the organs of mice with similar effects of glibenclamide tablet, a standard drug for the symptomatic treatment of diabetic mice [75]. In French marigold (Tagetes patula L.) that is used for skin and digestive conditions, the treatment of an endophytic bacteria consortium resulted in 56 % and 38 % in the contents of flavonoids and total polyphenols, respectively [76].

The roots of Alkanna tinctoria L. are rich in alkannin and shikonin, which are two enantiomeric polyphenols that induce excellent cytotoxicity in cancer cells [77]. A recent study of A. tinctoria grown in a greenhouse revealed that the plant developmental stage influenced both the metabolite contents and the plant root microbial diversity, and that the bacterial genera Labrys and Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium as well as four species of the fungal genus Penicillium were positively correlated with higher contents of alkannin and shikonin [77]. Four bacteria strains from the root microbiome of wild A. tinctoria, including Chitinophaga sp., Allorhizobium sp., Duganella sp., and Micromonospora sp., were shown to significantly increase the contents of alkannin and shikonin in hairy roots culture of the same plant species [78]. In Lithospermum officinale L., the contents of alkannin and shikonin were significantly increased by treatments with either one of the three bacteria strains belonging to Chitinophaga, Xanthomonas or Pseudomonas [79]. Subsequent transcriptome analysis using the Chitinophaga strain revealed that the bacterium increased the expression levels of genes that appeared to be mainly involved in plant defense and in the biosynthesis of PSMs including alkannin and shikonin derivatives [80], implying a potential correlation between the bacteria-induced plant defense and the enhanced alkannin and skikonin accumulation in L. officinale.

4. Microbe-increased production of alkaloids

Alkaloids are naturally occurring toxic amines primarily found in plants, where they mainly function in defense against pathogens and herbivores. Based on their heterocyclic rings and biosynthetic precursors, alkaloids are classified into diverse categories including indole, purine, quinoline, isoquinoline, tropane, imidazole, among others [81], [82]. As medicinal compounds, alkaloids are particularly well known as anaesthetics, cardioprotective, and anti-inflammatory agents [83].

Matrine and oxymatrine function as the most active alkaloids in Sophora flavescens for the pharmacological effects on cancers, viral hepatitis, and cardiac diseases [84], [85]. A recent study analyzed the association between rhizosphere microbiome and alkaloids accumulation in S. flavescens with different geographic locations and plant ages. The bioinformatics results indicated that some taxa belonging to Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi were potential stimulants for matrine and oxymatrine accumulation, whereas certain bacteria from the phyla Gemmatimonadetes and Acidobacteria showed negative correlation with the accumulation of matrine and oxymatrine [86]. Similarly, in Aconitum vilmorinianum Komarov that is used for treating rheumatism and pains, the bacteria Brevundimonas and fungus Cladosporium in root microbiome were suggested to be positively correlated with the presence of aconitine [87], which is an alkaloid with multiple pharmacological effects such as analgesic and anti-inflammatory [88].

Microbe-enhanced alkaloid accumulation in medicinal plants were recently observed in Adhatoda vasica Nees, which is used in the treatments of chronic bronchitis and diarrhea, among other diseases [89], and in Catharanthus roseus L. that is the sole resource of vinblastine and vincristine, two alkaloids with powerful anticancer activities [90]. By using hairy root developed from the cut edges of A. vasica leaf discs, multiple Azotobacter chroococcum and Pseudomonas putida strains were shown to increase the accumulation of pyrroloquizoline alkaloids, including vasicine, vasicinone, vasicine acetate, 2-acetyl benzyl amine, vasicinolone, deoxyvasicine and vasicol [89], which are the most bioactive phytochemicals in A. vasica with anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities [91]. The bacteria-enhanced production of pyrroloquizoline alkaloids was attributed to the increased activity of anthranilate synthase [89], which functions as a rate-limiting factor for the biosynthesis of pyrroloquinazoline alkaloids [92]. In C. roseus plants, treatments with either P. fluorescens strains 169 or A. brasilense strains Ab-101 increased the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of vinblastine and vincristine, resulting in significant increases in the contents of these two terpenoid indole alkaloids (TIAs) [90]. Interestingly, the TIA biosynthesis pathway in C. roseus was shown to be induced by SA, methyl-JA, and ethylene [93], [94], which are phytohormones known to mediate plant responses to microbes.

5. Conclusions and perspectives

Plants present a huge reservoir of secondary metabolites for medicinal usages. Many open-access databases of pharmacological plant metabolites are available, such as the 25 medicinal herbs databases recently reviewed in Fathifar et al. (2023) [95] and PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) that is the world’s largest collection of freely accessible chemical information. Due to the technical difficulties in de novo chemical synthesis, extraction from plants remains the most economic strategy for most of the complex PSMs, in addition to using the medicinal plants directly. Plant-beneficial microbes offer effective tools for increasing the contents of pharmacological PSMs in medicinal plants. Under such a specifically defined scope, the original studies reviewed herein account for only a small portion of the vast literature of microbial influences on plant secondary metabolites; nonetheless, these reports sufficiently demonstrated the increasing interests in exploiting microbial capacities for enhancing plant production of pharmacological metabolites. This research field has recently been boosted by the advances in microbiome research techniques, and is emerging as a new frontier of medicinal plant research, where a number of key questions beyond the beneficial effects await for elucidation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A schematic model for microbial fortification of pharmacological metabolites in medicinal plants. Emerging evidence has highlighted the effectiveness of microbes, either plant epiphytic or endophytic, in increasing the contents of pharmacological metabolites in medicinal plants, albeit a number of important questions remain to be addressed.

Currently some examples of the beneficial effects were proposed based on bioinformatics analyses that indicated positive correlations between the plant microbiome members and the PSMs of interest. Both the plants and their microbiome are subjected to the influences by the environment. Hence, it is helpful or even necessary to take environmental factors into account when considering the correlation between a medicinal PSM and the plant microbiome, especially for medicinal plants that display geo-herbalism. Plants provide not only physical niches but also nutrient molecules to microbes, thus a positive correlation between a microbe and a PSM may reflect the microbe’s chemotrophic preference to the PSM, in addition to the possibility that an increased PSM level results from an increased abundance of the microbe, although the two possibilities are not mutually exclusive. This ambiguity is related to another interesting question as how the microbe may benefit from the increased accumulation of the correlated PSM. In addition, positive correlations between a PSM and an endophyte may be due to the microbial capacity of producing metabolites that are similar or identical to the PSM of interest. For instance, dozens of fungal strains have been identified as taxol-producing endophytes from Taxus spp [96]. In the cases where the microbe-increased PSMs carry antimicrobial functions, it is intriguing whether the microbes are resistant to those PSMs.

Increasing the accumulation of PSMs that carry defense functions is a common response to biotic stimuli including beneficial microbes. Although the microbe-increased PSM accumulation may be mediated through the phytohormones JA, SA, and ethylene, which play important roles in plant defense, treating the medicinal plants with beneficial microbes likely would be superior to exogenous applications of the phytohormones, because the mutualism with beneficial microbes improves the plant’s growth and/or stress-resistance, whereas boosting the plant defense alone usually leads to retarded plant growth due to a trade-off balance between growth and defense. In the cases where the microbe-enhanced PSM accumulation was mediated through the plant defense, it is an important question about how the defensive effect on metabolism was specifically triggered by certain microbes instead of the other microbes. While examples of microbe-enhanced pharmacological PSMs in medicinal plants are increasing, clear insights into the underlying molecular mechanism are commonly hindered by a lag in the knowledge of functional genomics of these plant species. Meanwhile, the microbial factors that trigger the specific metabolic responses are crucial for understanding the mechanisms, and therefore should receive more attentions. Another important question regarding the mechanisms is how specific the microbial effects on the pharmacological PSMs are, in other words, whether the microbes alter the metabolism of other PSMs, particularly those that may negatively affect the pharmacological quality of the medicinal plants. Explicit molecular insights into the underlying mechanisms will underpin microbial applications for metabolic fortification in medicinal plants.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

X.W. and Y.Y. researched and wrote a draft. H.Z. researched and wrote the article. All authors reviewed and/or edited the article before submission. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

The authors apologize to those colleagues whose work is not cited owing to space constraints. Research in H. Zhang lab is supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

References

  • 1.Erb M., Kliebenstein D.J. Plant secondary metabolites as defenses, regulators, and primary metabolites: the blurred functional trichotomy. Plant Physiol. 2020;184(1):39–52. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Demain A.L., Fang A. The natural functions of secondary metabolites. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2000;69:1–39. doi: 10.1007/3-540-44964-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wink, M., Introduction, in Annual Plant Reviews Volume 39: Functions and Biotechnology of Plant Secondary Metabolites. 2010. p. 1–20. doi: 10.1002/9781444318876.
  • 4.Bednarek P. Sulfur-containing secondary metabolites from Arabidopsis thaliana and other Brassicaceae with function in plant immunity. Chembiochem. 2012;13(13):1846–1859. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201200086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takshak S., Agrawal S.B. Defense potential of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants under UV-B stress. J Photochem Photobio B. 2019;193:51–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bourgaud F., et al. Production of plant secondary metabolites: a historical perspective. Plant Sci. 2001;161(5):839–851. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00490-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li Y., et al. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;148:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Delaux P.M., Schornack S. Plant evolution driven by interactions with symbiotic and pathogenic microbes. Science. 2021;371(6531) doi: 10.1126/science.aba6605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang H. Plant latent defense response against compatibility. ISME J. 2023 doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01399-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lv S., et al. Dysfunction of histone demethylase IBM1 in Arabidopsis causes autoimmunity and reshapes the root microbiome. ISME J. 2022;16(11):2513–2524. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01297-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.He D.X., et al. Flavonoid-attracted Aeromonas sp. from the Arabidopsis root microbiome enhances plant dehydration resistance (July, 10.1038/s41396022-01288-7, 2022) Isme J. 2022;16(11) doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01309-5. 2633-2633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang Y., et al. Plant latent defense response to microbial non-pathogenic factors antagonizes compatibility. Natl Sci Rev. 2022;9(8) doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac109. nwac109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaushal R., et al. Dicer-like proteins influence Arabidopsis root microbiota independent of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Microbiome. 2021;9(1) doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00966-y. Artn 5710.1186/S40168-020-00966-Y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hacquard S., et al. Interplay between innate immunity and the plant microbiota. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017;Vol 55(55):565–589. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.de Vries F.T., et al. Harnessing rhizosphere microbiomes for drought-resilient crop production. Science. 2020;368(6488):270–274. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hou S., Wolinska K.W., Hacquard S. Microbiota-root-shoot-environment axis and stress tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021;62 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh S.K., et al. Microbial enhancement of plant nutrient acquisition. Stress Biol. 2022;2(1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s44154-021-00027-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang H., et al. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(2):104–119. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Emmanuel O.C., Babalola O.O. Productivity and quality of horticultural crops through co-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting bacteria. Microbiol Res. 2020:239. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126569. doi:Artn 12656910.1016/J.Micres.2020.126569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu W., et al. Beneficial relationships between endophytic bacteria and medicinal plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021:12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.646146. doi:Artn 64614610.3389/Fpls.2021.646146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cox-Georgian, D., et al., Therapeutic and Medicinal Uses of Terpenes. 2019.·doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.07.076.
  • 22.Ozdemir Z., Wimmer Z. Selected plant triterpenoids and their amide derivatives in cancer treatment: a review. Phytochemistry. 2022:203. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2022.113340. doi:ARTN 11334010.1016/j.phytochem.2022.113340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dudareva N., et al. Plant volatiles: recent advances and future perspectives. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2006;25(5):417–440. doi: 10.1080/07352680600899973. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lanier E.R., Andersen T.B., Hamberger B. Plant terpene specialized metabolism: complex networks or simple linear pathways? Plant J. 2023;114(5):1178–1201. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Su J., et al. Soil conditions and the plant microbiome boost the accumulation of monoterpenes in the fruit of Citrus reticulata 'Chachi'. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01504-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Commission, C.P., Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. 2020: China Medical Science Press. 199–200.
  • 27.Zia-ur-Rehman Citrus peel extract - a natural source of antioxidant. Food Chem. 2006;99(3):450–454. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu W., et al. Influence of tissue and geographic locality on culturable endophytic bacteria of Atractylodes macrocephala. Microbiol-Sgm. 2021;167(11) doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001109. doi:Artn 00110910.1099/Mic.0.001109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang C., et al. Iridoids: research advances in their phytochemistry, biological activities, and pharmacokinetics. Molecules. 2020;25(2):287. doi: 10.3390/molecules25020287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hou Q.Z., et al. Analysis of endophyte diversity of two Gentiana plants species and the association with secondary metabolite. Bmc Microbiol. 2022;22(1) doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02510-4. doi:Artn 9010.1186/S12866-022-02510-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou D.W., et al. Concentrations of the active constituents of the Tibetan folk medicine Qinjiao (Gentiana sect. Cruciata) within and between taxonomic species across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Chem Biodivers. 2010;7(8):2088–2094. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200900420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Polito G., et al. Endophytic bacteria and essential oil from ssp. share some VOCs with an antibacterial activity. Microorganisms. 2022;10(7) doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071424. doi:ARTN 142410.3390/microorganisms10071424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vitali F., et al. Employing genome mining to unveil a potential contribution of endophytic bacteria to antimicrobial compounds in the L. Essent Oil Antibiot-Basel. 2023;12(7) doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071179. doi:ARTN 117910.3390/antibiotics12071179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mahendran G., Rahman L.U. Ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological updates on Peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.)-a review. Phytother Res. 2020;34(9):2088–2139. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao H., et al. Peppermint essential oil: its phytochemistry, biological activity, pharmacological effect and application. Biomed Pharm. 2022;154 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Santoro M.V., et al. Volatile organic compounds from rhizobacteria increase biosynthesis of essential oils and growth parameters in peppermint (Mentha piperita) Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011;49(10):1177–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Banchio E., et al. Soil bacteria elevate essential oil accumulation and emissions in sweet basil. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(2):653–657. doi: 10.1021/jf8020305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cappellari L.D., et al. Induction of essential oil production in Mentha x piperita by plant growth promoting bacteria was correlated with an increase in jasmonate and salicylate levels and a higher density of glandular trichomes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;141:142–153. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brandle J.E., Telmer P.G. Steviol glycoside biosynthesis. Phytochemistry. 2007;68(14):1855–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Orellana-Paucar A.M. Steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana: an updated overview of their sweetening activity. Pharmacol Prop, Saf Asp Mol. 2023;28(3) doi: 10.3390/molecules28031258. doi:Artn 125810.3390/Molecules28031258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Prakash J., Egamberdieva D., Arora N.K. A novel Bacillus safensis-based formulation along with mycorrhiza inoculation for controlling alternaria alternata and simultaneously improving growth, nutrient uptake, and steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana under field conditions. Plants (Basel) 2022;(14):11. doi: 10.3390/plants11141857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oviedo-Pereira D.G., et al. Enhanced specialized metabolite, trichome density, and biosynthetic gene expression in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni plants inoculated with endophytic bacteria Enterobacter hormaechei. PeerJ. 2022;10 doi: 10.7717/peerj.13675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Simlat M., et al. Seeds of bertoni as a source of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria with the potential to synthesize rebaudioside A. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3) doi: 10.3390/ijms24032174. doi:Artn 217410.3390/Ijms24032174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang J.Y., et al. Differences in gene expression and endophytic bacterial diversity in Koidz. rhizomes from different growth years. Can J Microbiol. 2022;68(5):353–366. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2021-0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang J., et al. Differences in gene expression and endophytic bacterial diversity in Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. rhizomes from different growth years. Can J Microbiol. 2022;68(5):353–366. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2021-0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kumari P., Shanker K., Singh A. Insight into Andrographis paniculata associated bacterial endomicrobiome and assessment of culturable bacterial endophytes for enhancement of industrially important andrographolide content. Ind Crops Prod. 2023;200 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang X., et al. Pharmacological properties of tanshinones, the natural products from Salvia miltiorrhiza. Adv Pharm. 2020;87:43–70. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2019.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lin C., et al. Spatiotemporal and transcriptional characterization on tanshinone initial synthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza roots. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21) doi: 10.3390/ijms232113607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen H., et al. Endophytic fungus Cladosporium tenuissimum DF11, an efficient inducer of tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza roots. Phytochemistry. 2022;194 doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.113021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yan Y., et al. Effect and mechanism of endophytic bacteria on growth and secondary metabolite synthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014;36(5):1095–1105. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1484-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kao T.-C., Wu C.-H., Yen G.-C. Bioactivity and potential health benefits of licorice. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(3):542–553. doi: 10.1021/jf404939f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhong C., et al. Multi‐omics profiling reveals comprehensive microbe–plant–metabolite regulation patterns for medicinal plant Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(10):1874–1887. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Su X., et al. Glycyrrhizic acid: a promising carrier material for anticancer therapy. Biomed Pharm. 2017;95:670–678. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ni H., et al. Liquiritin alleviates pain through inhibiting CXCL1/CXCR2 signaling pathway in bone cancer pain rat. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:436. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yue L., et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens rescues glycyrrhizic acid loss under drought stress in glycyrrhiza uralensis by activating the jasmonic acid pathway. Front Microbiol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.798525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fu J., et al. Review of the botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, and pharmacology of Astragalus membranaceus (Huangqi) Phytother Res. 2014;28(9):1275–1283. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sheik A., et al. The anti-cancerous activity of adaptogenic herb Astragalus membranaceus. Phytomedicine. 2021;91 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li Y., et al. The composition of root-associated bacteria and fungi of Astragalus mongholicus and their relationship with the bioactive ingredients. Front Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.642730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lin Y., et al. The bacterial consortia promote plant growth and secondary metabolite accumulation in Astragalus mongholicus under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03859-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen W., Balan P., Popovich D.G. Review of ginseng anti-diabetic studies. Molecules. 2019;24(24):4501. doi: 10.3390/molecules24244501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gao Y., et al. An endophytic bacterium isolated from Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer enhances growth, reduces morbidity, and stimulates ginsenoside biosynthesis. Phytochem Lett. 2015;11:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2014.12.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Song X., et al. Endophytic bacteria isolated from panax ginseng improves ginsenoside accumulation in adventitious ginseng root culture. Molecules. 2017;22(6):837. doi: 10.3390/molecules22060837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yu K.W., et al. Jasmonic acid improves ginsenoside accumulation in adventitious root culture of Panax ginseng CA Meyer. Biochem Eng J. 2002;11(2–3):211–215. doi:Pii S1369-703x(02)00029-3Doi 10.1016/S1369-703x(02)00029-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bukhari S.I., Manzoor M., Dhar M.K. A comprehensive review of the pharmacological potential of Crocus sativus and its bioactive apocarotenoids. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;98:733–745. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ahmad T., et al. Insights into the endophytic bacterial microbiome of Crocus sativus: functional characterization leads to potential agents that enhance the plant growth, productivity, and key metabolite content. Microb Ecol. 2022;83(3):669–688. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01810-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhou X., et al. Phytoene synthase: the key rate-limiting enzyme of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.884720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ahrazem O., et al. Metabolic engineering of crocin biosynthesis in nicotiana species. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.861140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bravo L. Polyphenols: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance. Nutr Rev. 1998;56(11):317–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Durazzo A., et al. Polyphenols: a concise overview on the chemistry, occurrence, and human health. Phytother Res. 2019;33(9):2221–2243. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sun W., Shahrajabian M.H. Therapeutic potential of phenolic compounds in medicinal plants—natural health products for human health. Molecules. 2023;28(4):1845. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yang L., et al. Comprehensive microbiome and metabolome analyses reveal the medicinal components of Paeonia lactiflora. Plants. 2023;12(8):1612. doi: 10.3390/plants12081612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang J., et al. Antitumor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of kaempferol and its corresponding glycosides and the enzymatic preparation of kaempferol. PloS One. 2018;13(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fu S., et al. Flavonoids affect the endophytic bacterial community in Ginkgo biloba leaves with increasing altitude. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.982771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Deng M., et al. Calycosin: a review of its pharmacological effects and application prospects. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021;19(7):911–925. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1863145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang J., et al. Effect of Burkholderia ambifaria LK-P4 inoculation on the plant growth characteristics, metabolism, and pharmacological activity of Anoectochilus roxburghii. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1043042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Naveed M., et al. Plant-endophyte mediated improvement in physiological and bio-protective abilities of marigold (Tagetes patula) Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.993130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Csorba C., et al. Metabolite production in Alkanna tinctoria links plant development with the recruitment of individual members of microbiome thriving at the root-soil interface. mSystems. 2022;7(5) doi: 10.1128/msystems.00451-22. e00451-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rat A., et al. Endophytic bacteria from the roots of the medicinal plant Alkanna tinctoria Tausch (Boraginaceae): exploration of plant growth promoting properties and potential role in the production of plant secondary metabolites. Front Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.633488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Varela Alonso A., et al. Root-associated bacteria modulate the specialised metabolome of Lithospermum officinale L. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.908669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ahmad M., et al. Transcriptional dynamics of Chitinophaga sp. strain R-73072-mediated alkannin/shikonin biosynthesis in Lithospermum officinale. Front Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.978021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Smelcerovic A. Recent advances in analysis of natural products. Curr Anal Chem. 2013;9(1) doi: 10.2174/157341113804486509. 60-60. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Dey, P., et al., Analysis of alkaloids (indole alkaloids, isoquinoline alkaloids, tropane alkaloids). Elsevier Public Health Emergency Collection, 2020.·doi:10.1016/B978–0-12–816455-6.00015–9.
  • 83.Heinrich M., Mah J., Amirkia V. Alkaloids used as medicines: structural phytochemistry meets biodiversity-an update and forward look. Molecules. 2021;26(7) doi: 10.3390/molecules26071836. doi:Artn 183610.3390/Molecules26071836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen M.-H., et al. Biological effects and mechanisms of matrine and other constituents of Sophora flavescens in colorectal cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2021;171 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.He X., et al. Sophora flavescens Ait.: traditional usage, phytochemistry and pharmacology of an important traditional Chinese medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;172:10–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chen J., et al. Taxonomic structure of rhizosphere bacterial communities and its association with the accumulation of alkaloidal metabolites in Sophora flavescens. Front Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.781316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Li H.R., et al. Metabolomics and microbiome reveal potential root microbiota affecting the alkaloidal metabolome in Aconitum vilmorinianum Kom. Bmc Microbiol. 2022;22(1) doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02486-1. doi:Artn 7010.1186/S12866-022-02486-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Gao Y.B., et al. Aconitine: a review of its pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, toxicology and detoxification. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022:293. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115270. doi:Artn 11527010.1016/J.Jep.2022.115270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Singh B., et al. Azotobacter chroococcum and Pseudomonas putida enhance pyrroloquinazoline alkaloids accumulation in Adhatoda vasica hairy roots by biotization. J Biotechnol. 2022;353:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ahmadzadeh M., et al. Effect of the plant probiotic bacteria on terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis pathway gene expression profiling, vinblastine and vincristine content in the root of Catharanthus roseus. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(11):10357–10365. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07841-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Singh B., Sharma R.A. Anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties of pyrroloquinazoline alkaloids from Adhatoda vasica Nees. Phytomedicine. 2013;20(5):441–445. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2012.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Singh B., Sahu P.M., Sharma R.A. Effect of elicitors on the production of pyrroloquinazoline alkaloids by stimulating anthranilate synthase activity in Adhatoda vasica Nees cell cultures. Planta. 2017;246(6):1125–1137. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2757-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pan Y.J., et al. Transcriptomics comparison reveals the diversity of ethylene and methyl-jasmonate in roles of TIA metabolism in Catharanthus roseus. BMC Genom. 2018;19(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4879-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Soltani N., et al. The expression of terpenoid indole alkaloid (TIAs) pathway genes in Catharanthus roseus in response to salicylic acid treatment. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(9):7009–7016. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05759-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Fathifar Z., et al. New approaches in developing medicinal herbs databases. Database. 2023;2023:baac110. doi: 10.1093/database/baac110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhang P., Zhou P.P., Yu L.J. An endophytic taxol-producing fungus from Taxus x media, Aspergillus candidus MD3. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;293(2):155–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Maggini V., et al. Volatile profile of Echinacea purpurea plants after in vitro endophyte infection. Nat Prod Res. 2020;34(15):2232–2237. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2019.1579810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal are provided here courtesy of AAAS Science Partner Journal Program

RESOURCES