Table 1.
Crosstab.
| Groups | Total | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases (patients) | Controls (intact) | |||
| Consanguinity between the mother and the father | ||||
| There is kinshipnot | 76(45.0%) | 93(55.0%) | 169(100%) | .05 > .029* |
| There is kinship | 56(58.9%) | 39(41.1%) | 95(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
| Having a family history | ||||
| Not having | 88(40.2%) | 131(59.8%) | 219(100%) | .05 > .000* |
| Have | 44(97.8%) | 1(2.2%) | 45(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
| First degree consanguinity | ||||
| No | 114(46.3%) | 132(53.7%) | 246(100%) | .05 > .000* |
| Yes | 18(100.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 18(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
| Second degree consanguinity | ||||
| No | 121(47.8%) | 132(52.2%) | 253(100%) | .05 > .001* |
| Yes | 11(100.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 11(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
| Third degree consanguinity | ||||
| No | 114(46.5%) | 131(53.5%) | 245(100%) | .05 > .000* |
| Yes | 18(94.7%) | 1(5.3%) | 19(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
| Diabetes injury | ||||
| No | 127(49.0%) | 132(50.1%) | 259(100%) | .05 > .024* |
| Yes | 5(100.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 5(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
| Severe fever > 39° | ||||
| No | 80(39.4%) | 123(60.6%) | 203(100%) | .05 > .000* |
| Yes | 52(85.2%) | 9(14.8%) | 61(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
| X-rays during pregnancy | ||||
| No | 128(49.2%) | 132(50.8%) | 260(100%) | .05 > .044* |
| Yes | 4(100.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 44(100%) | |
| Total | 132(50.0%) | 132(50.0%) | 264(100%) | |
*
means (significant).