Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e34842. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034842

Table 1.

Summary of basic characteristics of the included studies.

First author (yr) Sample size (male/female) Age in yr Randomization method Treatment Control Frequency PSQI scores Location Blinding status Treatment duration Outcome Safety
Yuxueping (2019) 28 (15/13) 28 (12/16) 71.3 ± 5.7/72.3 ± 4.8 Random number table AC Estazolam Per day 14.82 ± 2.07/14.29 ± 2.67 Guangdong NA 4 w PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Sunzhaoyuan (2010) 40 (22/18) 40 (19/21) 74.32 ± 6.604/74.48 ± 6.687 Not reported AC Estazolam Per day 13.02 ± 2.89/13.15 ± 2.957 Tianjin NA 4 w PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Xuewenxion (2017) 40 (17/23) 40 (18/22) 69.01 ± 2.15/69.02 ± 2.14 Not reported AC Estazolam 1 time, 2 d NA Jiangsu NA 2 m Effective rate Not reported
Lishude (2021) 39 (17/22) 38 (20/18) 66.29 ± 4.96/65.62 ± 3.72 Random number table AC Estazolam 6 times per wk 6.36 ± 3.85/8.71 ± 3.08 Fujian NA 4 w PSQI; effective rate Y
Tanzhiwei (2020) 47 (23/24) 47 (25/22) 70.03 ± 3.11/69.13 ± 6.84 Not reported AC Oryzanol and lorazepam Per day 15.13 ± 3.08/15.06 ± 3.15 Hunan Double blinding 4 w PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Wangxiaoqiu (2021) 30 (13/17) 30 (11/18) 69 ± 4/69 ± 5 Random number table EA Sham AC 3 times per wk 13.90 ± 2.86/14.24 ± 3.11 Jiangsu Single blinding 4 w PSQI Y
Youxuyu (2019) 77 (34/43) 30 (12/18) 69.5 ± 2/70.5 ± 3 Random number table AC Estazolam Per day 15.6 ± 2.025/15.7 ± 1.878 Zheijiang NA 1 m PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Zhengyi (2020) 40 (18/22) 40 (17/21) 73.2 ± 3.3/72.2 ± 2.3 Not reported Moxibustion Diazepam Per day 14.33 ± 2.43/14.12 ± 2.21 Guangxi NA 20 d PSQI Not reported
Yangjingyi (2020) 40 (22/18) 40 (21/19) 62–72/61–71 Random number table AC Alprazolam Per day NA Zheijiang NA 4 w Effective rate Not reported
Zhanghanxiao(2022) 57 (25/32) 59 (28/31) 67.44 Not reported Moxibustion Estazolam/clonazepam/eszopiclone Per day 8.95 ± 3.00/9.25 ± 2.83 Fujian NA 20 d PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Chenjuan (2019) 51 (30/ 21) 49 (23/26) 63 ± 4/62 ± 3 Random number table AC plus Chinese medicine Chinese medicine Per day NA Hebei NA 20 d Effective rate Not reported
Daimeizhu (2014) 45 (23/22) 45 (25/20) 67.6 ± 6.4/69.5 ± 9.3 Random number table EA plus Chinese medicine Chinese medicine Per day 16.75 ± 1.23/16.49 ± 1.36 Hubei NA 4 w PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Liyuan (2022) 31 (16/15) 31 (17/14) 73.2 ± 1.7/73.4 ± 1.5 Not reported EA plus Chinese medicine Chinese medicine 1 time, 2 d 16.3 ± 2.4/16.7 ± 2.3 Guangdong NA 3 w PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Maxinyu (2021) 50 (26/24) 50 (23/27) 71.2 ± 7.9/70.9 ± 8.5 Random toss AC plus Chinese medicine Chinese medicine 1 time, 2 d 13.27 ± 2.39/13.25 ± 2.41 Beijing NA 4 w Effective rate Not reported
Niuqiyun (2021) 30 (18/12) 30 (20/10) 84.64 ± 2.67/84.57 ± 2.61 Not reported AC plus estazolam Estazolam Per day 16.09 ± 1.15/16.00 ± 1.13) Henan NA 30 d PSQI Not reported
Wangjie (2020) 80 (46/34) 80 (39/41) 64.03 ± 2.87/64.93 ± 3.28 Not reported AC plus psychological intervention Psychological intervention Per day 13.06 ± 2.57/12.81 ± 2.77 Shandong NA 40 d PSQI Not reported
Wangyuliang (2021) 30 (14/16) 30 (12/18) 63.39 ± 4.732/64.38 ± 5.342 Random number table AC plus Chinese medicine Chinese medicine 2 times per day 14.34 ± 1.753/14.64 ± 1.729 Beijing NA 18 d PSQI; effective rate Not reported
Xuyanjie (2018) 43 (13/30) 43 (12/31) 73.4 ± 11.6/74.5 ± 12.1 Random number table AC plus cognitive behavior Cognitive behavior 2 times, 1 wk NA Beijing NA 8 w Effective rate Not reported
Yeshulan (2007) 30 (13/17) 28 (10/18) 68/65 Not reported AC plus Chinese medicine Chinese medicine Per day NA Beijing NA 30 d Effective rate Not reported
Liuli (2019) 39 (17/22) 39 (19/20) 75.20 ± 4.38 75.18 ± 4.32 AC plus estazolam and oryzanol Estazolam and oryzanol 5 times, 1 wk NA Yunnan NA 4 w PSQI; effective rate Not reported

PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.