Table 4.
Multigroup invariance according to the geographical context of the proposed model
| Multigroup invariance | χ2 | DF | Δβ | Δp | Interpretation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall test | Without restrictions | 2167.135 | 99,648 | |||
| Constrained | 2170.54 | 74,801 | ||||
| Difference | 3.405 | 24,847 | ||||
| P-value | 1.000 | The p-value of the chi-square difference test is not significant; interpret local tests with caution. | ||||
| Route name | β Lima (capital) | β Province | Δβ | Δp | Interpretation | |
| Local tests | F3 → F1. | 0.371*** | 0.293** | 0.078 | 1.000 | No difference. |
| F4 → F1. | -0.301*** | -0.366** | 0.066 | 1.000 | No difference. | |
| F3 → F2. | 0.339*** | 0.508*** | -0.169 | 1.000 | No difference. | |
| F4 → F2. | -0.102† | -0.173† | 0.071 | 1.000 | No difference. | |
| F1 → F2. | 0.130* | 0.237* | -0.108 | 1.000 | No difference. | |
Nota. Indicators of statistical significance: † p < 0,100, * p < 0,050, ** p < 0,010, *** p < 0,001, F1: resilience, F2: post-traumatic growth, F3: negative stress, F4: positive stress, “Multigroup Analysis”, AMOS Plugin. StatWiki de Gaskination