Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 21;21:331. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03228-x

Table 2.

Comparison of treatment effects between the observation and control groups

Observation group (n = 23) Control group (n = 20) Value of statistics t/zχ2 P
Operation time (min) 230.0 (205.0, 280.0) 202.5 (173.8, 315.0) z = 0.939 0.348
Blood loss (ml) 50.0 (50.0, 100.0) 50.0 (50.0, 100.0) z = 0.527 0.598
Postoperative anal exhaust time (d) 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) 2.5 (2.0, 3.8) z = 1.221 0.222
Postoperative hospital stay (d) 12.2 ± 4.4 19.3 ± 5.8 t = 4.577 0.000
The number of lymph node dissections [PCS] 18.5 ± 5.9 15.6 ± 7.8 t = 1.395 0.171
Overall postoperative complicationsa[n (%)] 2 (8.7) 8 (40) χ2 = 5.874 0.015
Postoperative wound infection 1 (4.3) 1 (5.0) 1.000
Subcutaneous fluid collection 0 1 (5.0) 0.465
Postoperative intra-abdominal infection 1 (4.3) 1 (5.0) 1.000
Pulmonary infection 1 (4.3) 1 (5.0) 1.000
Postoperative incomplete intestinal obstruction 0 4 (20.0) 0.039
Postoperative circulatory complications 0 1 (5.0) 0.465

aOne patient in the observation group had postoperative incision infection and pulmonary infection. One patient in the control group had postoperative incision infection and incomplete intestinal obstruction