. 2023 Oct 21;13:18019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45042-1

Table 2.

The interaction effect of deficit irrigation × TiO₂-NPs (A) and simple effect of them (B) on biochemical and physiological parameters of the rose plant.

(A)						(B)
Deficit irrigation	TiO₂-NP (ppm)	EL (%)	PC (mg/gfw)	AA (%)	TP (eq galic acid/1gr dw)			RWC (%)	FC (eq quersetin/1gr dw)	TC (mg/gdw)
FI	30	19.24^ef*	11.82^bcd	78.56^abc	27.50^bcd
	15	26.60^c	12.80^bc	81.15^ab	30.46^ab	Deficit irrigation	FI	73.69^bc	4.39^b	152.37^b
	0	25.98^cd	6.49f.	75.39^bc	28.36^bc		PRD1	79.46^a	4.66^b	119.60^c
							PRD2	77.00^ab	4.89^b	141.20^bc
PRD1	30	18.81f.	7.38f.	78.13^abc	22.66^ef		SDI	72.90^c	5.99^a	188.44^a
	15	18.92f.	6.95f.	78.56^abc	26.23^cde
	0	32.15^b	7.47f.	71.71^c	21.98f.
PRD2	30	24.07^c−f	13.06^b	80.39^ab	27.15^bcd	TiO₂-NP (ppm)	30	–	5.60^a	174.29^a
	15	21.28^def	7.82^ef	76.02^bc	29.26^abc		15	–	4.91^b	147.38^b
	0	28.45^bc	7.08^ef	62.57^d	20.36f.		0	–	4.44^b	129.53^b
SDI	30	24.38^cde	10.59^cd	80.17^ab	33.10^a
	15	24.12^c−f	15.59^a	84.36^a	30.85^ab
	0	40.74^a	10.02^de	79.39^ab	24.14^def

*Means followed by same letters in each column does not have a significant difference based on the LSD test (p ≤ 0.01).