3. Reduce sexual risk (Sieving 2012): case management + peer leadership versus control1.
| Outcome1 | Timeframe | Intervention | Control | Effect size | P value |
| Mean (standard error) | |||||
| Consistency of dual‐method use2,3 (hormonal + condoms) | 12 months | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.07 (0.04) | ‐‐‐ | 0.18 |
| 18 months | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.05 (0.04) | 0.38 | 0.06 | |
1Results as reported by researchers; insufficient data for analysis in this review. 2Consistency = # months (of past 6) reportedly used dual methods every time had sex with recent partner / # months had sex with that partner; scored from 0 to 1. 3Reportedly used analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline measure and variation in study design (Characteristics of included studies has details on assignment to groups). Group effect sizes reportedly computed using Cohen's d with pooled standard deviation. Effect size reported if P value < 0.10, due to small sample size (pilot study for Sieving 2013).