Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 11;9(10):e20891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20891

Table 7.

Comparative analysis results.

Hypothesis Influence Path Comparative Analysis
Path Difference p-Value
H1 PA→II 0.231
(**)
0.008
H2 SN→ II 0.168 (ns) 0.189
H3 PBC → II 0.284 (**) 0.002
H4 PG →II −0.108 (ns) 0.194
H5 PG →PA −0.079 (ns) 0.376
H6 PG→SN −0.073 (ns) 0.574
H7 PG→PBC −0.067 (ns) 0.403
H8 PR→II 0.030 (ns) 0.724
H9 PR→PA −0.059 (ns) 0.484
H10 PR→SN −0.020 (ns) 0.876
H11 PR→PBC 0.166 (ns) 0.051
H12 PG→PA→II 0.016 (ns) 0.366
H13 PR→PA→II 0.021 (ns) 0.228
H14 PG→SN→II −0.004 (ns) 0.760
H15 PR→SN→II 0.004 (ns) 0.723
H16 PG→PBC→II 0.042 (ns) 0.063
H17 PR→PBC→II 0.057 (**) 0.001
H18 PG→II (Total indirect effect) 0.055 (ns) 0.098
H19 PR→II (Total indirect effect) 0.082 (**) 0.005

Note: S means support; ns means non-support.

Note 2: Path difference = β bungalow respondents- β building respondents.

***p < 0.001.

**p < 0.01.

*p < 0.05.