Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 7;19(1):114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.09.005

Table 2.

Distribution of anatomical variation in the sphenoidal sinus, identified with CT scans among female participants.

Anatomical variations in the sphenoidal sinus Women (n = 400)
Cases n (%)
Controls n (%)
(n = 200)
(n = 200)
Absent Unilateral Bilateral Absent Unilateral Bilateral
Accessory sinus septa 69 (34.0) 34 (17.0) 97 (48.5) 128 (64.0) 17 (8.5) 55 (27.5)
ICA protrusion 124 (62.0) 7 (3.5) 66 (33.0) 158 (80.5) 19 (9.5) 21 (10.5)
ICA dehiscence 137 (68.5) 16 (8.0) 47 (23.5) 161 (80.5) 26 (13.0) 13 (16.5)
Optic nerve protrusion 94 (47.0) 11 (5.5) 95 (47.5) 140 (70.0) 26 (13.0) 33 (23.5)
Optic nerve dehiscence 79 (39.5) 32 (16.0) 89 (44.5) 117 (58.5) 2 (1.0) 81 (40.5)
ACP pneumatization 120 (60.0) 9 (4.5) 70 (35.0) 143 (71.5) 4 (2.0) 53 (26.5)

The study groups were cases and controls. CT images were collected with a Siemens AG Somatom scanner and used to assess anatomical variation in the sphenoidal sinuses. Data are shown as frequencies (n) with percentages in parentheses (%). Abbreviations: ICA, internal carotid artery; ACP, anterior clinoid process; CT scan, computerized tomography scan; cases, patients with chronic rhinosinusitis; controls, healthy individuals without chronic rhinosinusitis.