Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 15;4(10):101198. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101198

Table 2.

Common preanalytical issues and recommendations

Preanalytical issue Challenges Recommendations
Isolation of disease-specific analytes from biofluids (CTCs, ctDNA, EVs) lack of standardized protocols for processing of biofluids
poor consistency among studies of reported kits employed for analyte isolation
need to establish standard sample handling and collection protocols
use of extensively tested and validated commercially available kits for optimal analyte isolation
Study population selection convenience sampling commonly used to validate proposed mutation detection assays
suboptimal control population
multi-institutional collaborations to design a comprehensive patient population for improved generalizability of reported results
selection of appropriate controls (healthy, benign disease of the same organ)
Confounding biological and environmental variables influence of pre-sampling factors on quality of isolated analytes (circadian rhythm, fasting, metabolic disorders, hypertension, pregnancy, lactation) inclusion of recommendations in sample collection protocols to improve rigor and reproducibility
Long-term sample storage conditions and biobanking inconsistent data on decay rates reported with the use of different storage methods
freeze-thaw cycles and thawing procedure can influence target nucleic acid concentration and integrity
need to determine optimal storage conditions (time, temperature) for cell-free matrices and extracted nucleic acid
evaluation of appropriate thawing procedure (duration, i.e., fast vs. slow, temperature) and sample storage volumes
Inclusion of study design specific controls limited understanding of biological variation in individual samples as well as patients’ own biofluids over the course of disease use of internal synthetic, known standards, to better account for biological variation in the biofluids and technical variation in reported techniques