Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 23;13(44):31002–31016. doi: 10.1039/d3ra05596e

Comparison with various adsorbents for CV.

Adsorbent q max (mg g−1) K L (L mg−1) References
Polyaniline@TiO2 80 0.004 43
p(NIPAM-co-MAA1.0)/b-CD0.4 1253.7 0.0136 44
Gum arabic-cl-poly(acrylamide) nanohydrogel 90.9 0.047 45
Rarasaponin–bentonite-activated biochar composite 518.6 0.0741 46
Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin–polyurethane magnetic nanoconjugates 1269 47
Zeolitic imidazolate framework-9 (Z9-600) 26.8 48
Modified rice bran/alginate hydrogel beads 454.55 0.011 36
Husk of agarwood fruit/sodium alginate hydrogel 370.37 0.022 37
Cellulose/carrageenan magnetic hydrogel microbeads 217.1 0.0159 38
P(AA-co-AMPS)-grafted chitosan hydrogel 2023 0.0054 This study