TABLE 2.
Fit statistics for the CFAs by group
| Age | 6 | 12 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood | HL | LR | LR&HR | M | HR | LR | LR&HR | |
| Sex | M&F | F | M&F | F | M | |||
| Chi square | 160.84, p = 0.005 | 87.22, p = 0.16 | 120.16, p = 0.009 | 214.76, p < 0.01 | 202.52, p < 0.01 | 129.06, p = 0.023 | 149.85, p = 0.029 | 177.31, p < 0.001 |
| CFI | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| TLI | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| RMSEA | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.048 | 0.06 |
| SRMR | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.084 | 0.13 | 0.098 | 0.08 |
Note. CFAs were fitted by age, likelihood, and sex to establish configural invariance for a single latent factor reflected by the social-motivation indicators, a prerequisite for testing for MI using MNLFA.