Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023 Aug 31;91(11):652–664. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000845

Table 2:

Unadjusted odds ratios of engagement for different baseline covariates

Engagement

Predictor aPNF aSelf-monitoring aStage 1 bStage 2

Odds ratio (95% CI) Odds ratio (95% CI) Odds ratio (95% CI) Odds ratio (95% CI)

Demographics

Female (vs. Male) 1.20 (0.84, 1.72) 1.18 (0.72, 1.95) 1.145 (0.81, 1.617) 1.81 (0.93, 3.53)
Non-white race/ethnicity (vs. White) 1.19 (0.78, 1.80) 1.38 (0.75, 2.56) 1.225 (0.82, 1.829) 0.91 (0.35, 2.33)
Greek life intention (Yes/Undecided vs. No) 0.77 (0.54, 1.10) 0.56 (0.34, 0.90) * 0.62 (0.44, 0.87) ** 0.68 (0.35, 1.31)
Parents’ highest education (College degree or higher vs. Less) 0.75 (0.49, 1.14) 1.33 (0.69, 2.56) 0.87 (0.575, 1.318) 1.66 (0.71, 3.88)
Family member with drinking problem (Yes vs. No) 1.22 (0.85, 1.75) 1.01 (0.61, 1.67) 1.06 (0.75, 1.50) 1.34 (0.69, 2.58)

Mental Health

Average patient health questionnaire score (0–3) 1.19 (0.86, 1.64) 1.06 (0.68, 1.66) 1.22 (0.90, 1.67) 1.94 (1.01, 3.73) *
Suicidal ideation score (0–3) 0.98 (0.58, 1.66) 0.68 (0.38, 1.23) 0.94 (0.57, 1.54) 1.24 (0.49, 3.13)
Average perceived stress score (0–4) 1.03 (0.780, 1.34) 0.99 (0.69, 1.44) 1.02 (0.79, 1.31) 1.38 (0.81, 2.36)
Average general anxiety disorder score (0–3) 1.02 (0.78, 1.35) 1.13 (0.76, 1.69) 1.11 (0.85, 1.45) 1.57 (0.86, 2.88)

Drinking-related predictors

Pre-college binge drinking (Some vs. Never) 0.61 (0.42, 0.88) ** 0.41 (0.25, 0.68) *** 0.47 (0.32, 0.67) *** -
cMid-semester binge frequency (0–10) - - - 0.98 (0.79, 1.21)
Baseline perceived norm % binge (10% increments, 0–100) 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) ** 0.84 (0.74, 0.95) ** 0.86 (0.78, 0.94) *** 0.94 (0.79, 1.12)
Baseline alcohol consequences (0–24) 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) 0.90 (0.83, 0.98) * 0.90 (0.84, 0.96) ** 0.91 (0.81, 1.02)
Average social motives score (0–5) 0.94 (0.85, 1.05) 0.80 (0.69, 0.93) ** 0.87 (0.79, 0.97) 0.84 (0.66, 1.08)
Average coping motives score (0–5) 0.96 (0.80, 1.14) 0.72 (0.58, 0.90) ** 0.84 (0.71, 0.99) * 0.89 (0.64, 1.23)
Average enhancement motives score (0–5) 0.94 (0.84, 1.06) 0.77 (0.66, 0.90) *** 0.87 (0.77, 0.97) * 0.82 (0.62, 1.09)
Average conformity motives score (0–5) 0.90 (0.74, 1.10) 0.66 (0.51, 0.85) *** 0.77 (0.63, 0.93) ** 0.87 (0.57, 1.33)

Readiness to change

Pre-contemplation score (-8 to 8) 1.04 (0.98, 1.09) 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.00 (0.95, 1.06) 0.95 (0.83, 1.08)
Contemplation score (-8 to 8) 1.03 (0.97, 1.09) 0.96 (0.89, 1.05) 0.99 (0.93, 1.05) 0.96 (0.85, 1.08)
Action score (-8 to 8) 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) 0.98 (0.93, 1.03) 1.14 (1.01, 1.29) *

Assigned intervention and previous engagement

Late intervention (vs. Early) 1.16 (0.82, 1.64) 0.89 (0.55, 1.45) 1.15 (0.82, 1.60) 0.71 (0.37, 1.37)
Email intervention (vs. Coach) - - - 0.82 (0.43, 1.56)
PNF engagement (Some vs. none) - - - 2.81 (1.39, 5.68) **
a

Engagement among API students (N=591).

b

Engagement in the Stage 2 bridging strategy is only among heavy drinkers (N=158).

c

Mid-semester binge frequency is obtained from self-monitoring surveys in Stage 1 and is only considered a predictor of Stage 2 engagement among heavy drinkers. Stage 1 engagement is engaging in both PNF and self-monitoring components. PNF=Personalized Normative Feedback. CI=Confidence Interval

***

p<0.001

**

p<0.01

*

p<0.05