Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023 Aug 31;91(11):652–664. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000845

Table 3:

Adjusted odds ratios of engagement

Selected Predictors of Engagement Adjusted OR (95% CI)

a PNF Engagement

Pre-college binge frequency (Some vs. Never) 0.56 (0.36, 0.86)**
Readiness to change contemplation score (−8 to 8) 1.08 (1.01, 1.16)*
Baseline perceived norm % drink alcohol (10% increments, 0–100) 0.89 (0.79, 0.99)*
Family member with a drinking problem (Yes vs. No) 1.37 (0.93, 2.03)

a Self-Monitoring Engagement

Pre-college binge frequency (Some vs. Never) 0.59 (0.34, 1.03)
Average conformity motives score (0–5) 0.75 (0.56, 0.99)*
Greek life intention (Yes/Undecided vs. No) 0.68 (0.41, 1.15)

a Stage 1 Engagement

Pre-college binge frequency (Some vs. Never) 0.54 (0.36, 0.81)**
Greek life intention (Yes/Undecided vs. No) 0.68 (0.47, 0.99)*
Baseline perceived norm % binge (10% increment, 0–100) 0.91 (0.82, 1.01)

b Stage 2 Engagement

PNF engagement (Some vs. None) 2.97 (1.39, 6.32)**
Readiness to change action score (−8 to 8) 1.22 (1.04, 1.43)*
Readiness to change contemplation score (−8 to 8) 0.84 (0.72, 0.98)*
Average patient health questionnaire score (0–3) 1.71 (0.80, 3.65)
Family member with a drinking problem (Yes vs. No) 1.71 (0.82, 3.58)
Parents’ highest education (Less than bachelors vs. More) 1.93 (0.76, 4.87)

Note:

a

Engagement among API students (N=591).

b

Engagement in the assigned Stage 2 bridging strategy is only among heavy drinkers (N=158). Stage 1 engagement is engagement in both PNF and self-monitoring components.

***

p<0.001

**

p<0.01

*

p<0.05

PNF=Personalized Normative Feedback; OR=Odds Ratio; CI=Confidence Interval; Freq=frequency.