Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2023 Sep 4;50(11):701–712. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001865

Safety of longer-term doxycycline use: A systematic review and meta-analysis with implications for bacterial STI chemoprophylaxis

Philip A Chan 1,2, Danielle L Le Brazidec 1, Jeffrey S Becasen 3, Harrison Martin 1, Jhanavi Kapadia 1, Hilary Reno 2,4, Laura Bachmann 2, Lindley A Barbee 2
PMCID: PMC10592014  NIHMSID: NIHMS1929035  PMID: 37732844

Abstract

Background:

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia have significantly increased over the past decade in the United States. Doxycycline as chemoprophylaxis (i.e., post-exposure prophylaxis [PEP]) offers promise for addressing bacterial STIs. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the safety of longer-term doxycycline use (defined as eight or more weeks) in the context of potential use as STI chemoprophylaxis through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Methods:

This review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search MEDLINE/PubMed for clinical studies published from August 2003 through January 2023 that reported on adverse events with doxycycline use with a focus on side-effects and metabolic effects of long-term use.

Results:

A total of 67 studies were included in the systematic review. Overall, studies on longer-term doxycycline use reported 0% to over 50% adverse events ranging from mild to severe. Most common adverse events included gastrointestinal symptoms (i.e., nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain), dermatologic (i.e., rash), and neurological (i.e., headache and dizziness) symptoms. Discontinuation of doxycycline due to adverse events was relatively uncommon in most studies. A meta-analysis of placebo controlled clinical trials (N=18) revealed gastrointestinal and dermatological adverse events were more likely to occur in the doxycycline group.

Conclusion:

Longer-term (8+ weeks) doxycycline use is generally safe and may be associated with minor side-effects. Further research is needed on the potential metabolic impact of longer-term doxycycline use.

Short Summary:

A systematic review of longer-term doxycycline (8+ weeks) found the medication was generally well-tolerated and safe. Findings have implications for doxycycline as chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections.

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia have significantly increased over the past decade in the United States (US) with approximately 2.5 million reported cases in 2021 (1). Importantly, cases of STIs disproportionately impact certain populations including gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW), as well as African American/Black and Hispanic/Latino communities. One potential approach to addressing the increasing burden of STIs includes chemoprophylaxis with antimicrobials and specifically doxycycline. Recent studies have evaluated doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), taking the medication after a potential STI exposure, and found that this approach effectively reduces bacterial STIs in MSM and TGW (25). This novel approach offers a potentially powerful tool to address the increasing burden of bacterial STIs in the US.

Doxycycline was initially evaluated as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent bacterial STIs in a pilot study in 2015 which suggested potential benefits in a small cohort (N=30) of MSM with HIV when taken daily before an exposure occurred (5). Subsequent studies have evaluated doxycycline as PEP taken as a single 200mg dose ideally within 24 hours and up to 72 hours after condomless sex. The IPERGAY study conducted from July 2015 to January 2016 among MSM and TGW receiving HIV PrEP demonstrated efficacy of doxycycline as PEP in preventing syphilis and chlamydia but not gonorrhea (3). In 2022, the DoxyPEP study conducted in Seattle and San Francisco demonstrated that doxycycline as PEP prevented syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia in both MSM and TGW with HIV and those taking HIV PrEP (2). Other recent studies have confirmed that doxycycline is effective as PEP in preventing bacterial STIs in MSM and TGW (4). A single study found that doxycycline as PEP was not significant in cis-gender heterosexual women (6), which has been attributed to low adherence (7). Further studies of cis-gender women and other populations which also include doxycycline as PrEP for STI prevention are ongoing.

One important consideration for doxycycline as STI chemoprophylaxis is the safety of longer-term, intermittent use of the medication. Doxycycline was initially approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1967. Doxycycline is generally well absorbed and tolerated, with a half-life of approximately 12 hours (8,9). The medication has been extensively used longer-term to treat acne and rosacea (10) and for prophylaxis to prevent scrub typhus (11), Lyme disease (12), tick-borne relapsing fever (13,14), leptospirosis (1518), and malaria (19). Adverse effects most commonly associated with doxycycline hyclate have included photosensitivity (20) and esophageal erosion and ulceration (21). Adverse effects generally resolve with discontinuation of the medication. However, despite the broad use of doxycycline, limited data is available on the longer-term safety of the medication.

A prior systematic review on the safety of doxycycline was published by Smith and Leyden, and reviewed data from 1966 to 2003 (22). The overall findings of this review included 24 clinical trials of doxycycline with a “very low” incidence of adverse events in general. Gastrointestinal adverse events were the most common side-effects reported. This review did not specifically focus on longer-term use and included a total of three studies with 20 days or longer use.

The goal of the current study was to evaluate the safety of longer-term doxycycline use (defined as eight or more weeks) in the context of potential use as STI chemoprophylaxis through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (23) to search MEDLINE/PubMed for clinical studies that reported on adverse events with doxycycline use with a focus on side-effects and metabolic effects of long-term use. The following search terms were used: “doxycycline” AND (“adverse reaction” OR “adverse event” OR “side effect”). The review was conducted for studies that were published from August 2003 through January 2023. We also included studies from a prior systematic review conducted for studies published from 1966 to August 2003 (22). Inclusion criteria for our initial screening included any retrospective or prospective clinical study with an average duration of two months (eight weeks) or more on doxycycline. Eight weeks or more was chosen given that people on doxycycline chemoprophylaxis would likely be taking the medication for months. There were no restrictions in regards to country; publication language; date; or patient age, race, gender, or sexuality. Exclusion criteria included: non-human subjects or in-vitro studies, unrelated papers, duplicates, unavailable full texts, abstract-only publications, and case reports. Papers that reported on doxycycline use in combination with other oral medications were generally excluded since it was difficult to identify the side effects from doxycycline alone. However, studies with multiple oral medications including doxycycline that evaluated metabolic effects were included given the overall paucity of data on this topic. After our initial screening, we also reviewed other review articles from the initial search to identify additional studies to include.

Each included article was manually reviewed for information about the study period, study type, and study population. We also collected information about the formulation, dose, and duration of doxycycline in each study. Articles were also reviewed for information about doxycycline adverse events, including severity of events (mild, moderate, severe) and type of clinical event (neurological, gastrointestinal, dermatological/skin, other). Severity of events was classified according to the definitions used by the study which reported the event. There was some variation, but in general, mild or moderate adverse events referred to those causing minimal or some interference with daily activities. Severe adverse events were those causing an inability to perform daily activities or those that were potentially life-threatening or resulted in hospitalization. For the clinical event type, we broadly included any specific symptom of the clinic event type in the overarching group. For example, one study may have reported only nausea or diarrhea, and another included abdominal pain. All these various symptoms would be included under the gastrointestinal event type.

For the meta-analysis, we limited the included studies to only those reporting generally healthy individuals and reported adverse events for participants in both the doxycycline treatment arm and placebo groups. All statistical analyses and calculations of effect sizes were conducted in R using the Metafor statistical package (24). We calculated relative risk estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model to assess the rate of adverse events between the treatment group receiving doxycycline and a comparison group receiving placebo. We repeated all analyses using only studies that provided 100–200 mg dosages of doxycycline per day to reflect the dosage of doxycycline used as PEP to prevent STIs. Relative risk estimates were only calculated when three or more studies reported data for the outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q-test statistic and I2 values, which describe the percentage of variation across studies that is attributable to heterogeneity rather than chance (25).

RESULTS

Systematic Review Results

We identified a total of N=828 total articles (Figure 1). After review, N=678 were excluded due to being unrelated and/or not clinical studies. The remaining 150 articles were manually assessed for eligibility. We excluded a total of 103 of these articles for the following reasons: doxycycline used for less than 8 weeks (n=61), non-clinical trial (n=17), doxycycline used in combination with other drugs (n=12), case report/case series (n=7), protocol description (n=3), non-oral doxycycline formulation used (n=1), commentary (n=1), and full text not available (n=1). The remaining 47 studies were included after this initial screening. We also manually reviewed an additional 28 review articles to determine if there were any relevant studies missed in our initial screening. This review led to 20 studies being identified and added to the initial screening, for a total of 67 studies included in our systematic review (Table 1). The 67 articles included in the review were published from 1987 to 2022. The most common studies include those focused on rosacea treatment (N=14), acne treatment (N=13), and malaria prophylaxis (N=11). One study specifically looked at doxycycline for STI PEP. Populations included those 9 years of age and older. Most studies were performed in the United States (N=21). Doxycycline doses ranged from 20mg to 200mg a day depending on the study. Time on doxycycline ranged from eight weeks (minimum study inclusion) to over three years. The total number of people in these studies who reported being on doxycycline was N=10,106 (Range: 7–1,196). Twenty-two studies report at least mild or moderate side-effects or adverse events related to doxycycline use ranging from 0% to 88%. Severe side-effects or adverse events in people on doxycycline ranged from 0% to 14% per study. These results should be interpreted in the setting of the specific study and patient population. For example, the study reporting 14% severe side-effects or adverse events was in the setting of doxycycline use in people with osteoarthritis and therefore potentially significant comorbidities (26). Although 14% of people reported severe side-effects or adverse events in the doxycycline group, the authors did mention that these events were unlikely caused by doxycycline. Many studies that reported severe adverse events in individuals on doxycycline did not attribute the events to the medication (3,2631). In the studies that did report severe adverse events for individuals on doxycycline, these included allergic reactions (27,30,32), dermatologic and skin reactions (3335), gastrointestinal (32,34,35), and neurological (3437).

FIGURE 1:

FIGURE 1:

PRISMA Diagram

TABLE 1:

Characteristics of studies identified by the systematic literature review that assess longer-term1 doxycycline use and adverse events

First Author Publication Year Study Population Study Site Drug Duration (Days) Doxycycline (N) Mild* (n) Moderate* (n) Severe* (n) Stopped (adverse events)
Akhyani (56) 2008 Rosacea Treatment 27–72 years old Iran Doxycycline 100mg once daily 91 30 NR NR NR 0
Alexis (57) 2012 Rosacea Treatment 18+ years old United States Doxycycline 40mg once daily (30 mg immediate release and 10 mg delayed release beads) once daily 84 1196 NR NR NR NR
Andersen (58)** 1998 Malaria Prophylaxis 18–55 years old Kenya Doxycycline 100mg once daily 70 55 NR NR NR 1
Angelakis (44) 2014 Q Fever Endocarditis Treatment 18+ years old France Doxycycline 100mg twice a day (and hydroxychloroquine) 540+ 48 NR NR NR NR
Arman (59) 2015 Rosacea Treatment Adults Turkey Doxycycline 100mg BID for one month then once daily for two months 90 19 NR NR NR NR
Babaeinejad (60) 2011 Acne Treatment 13+ years old Iran Doxycycline 100mg once daily 90 50 4 0 0 0
Baudon (61) 1999 Malaria Prophylaxis Adult soldiers Gabon and the Central African Republic Doxycycline 100mg once daily 120+ 171 NR NR NR 11
Baxter (43) 2002 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment 54–84 years old United States (Multiple States) Doxycycline 100mg twice per day 90+ 36 NR NR NR 3
Berende (27) 2016 Lyme Disease Treatment Adults Netherlands Doxycycline 100mg twice a day 84 86 39 (Mild or Moderate) 39 (Mild or Moderate) 3 3
Brandt (26)** 2005 Osteoarthritis Treatment 45–64 years old United States (Indiana) Doxycycline 100mg twice a day 900 218 NR NR 31 25
Brill (52) 2015 COPD Treatment 45+ years old United Kingdom Doxycycline 100mg once daily 91 25 2 (Mild or Moderate) 2 (Mild or Moderate) 0 0
Caton (36)** 2000 Chronic Periodontitis 30–75 years old United States (Multiple) Doxycycline 20mg twice a day 274 93 NR NR 1 1
Del Rosso (28)** 2007 Rosacea Treatment 18+ years old United States and Puerto Rico Doxycycline monohydrate 40mg once daily (formulation: 30-mg immediate-release and 10-mg delayed-release beads) 112 269 133 (Mild or Moderate) 133 (Mild or Moderate) 16 19
Del Rosso (62)** 2022 Acne Treatment 12+ years old United States (Multiple Sites) Doxycycline 120mg once daily (with trifarotene cream) 84 133 3 (Mild or Moderate) 3 (Mild or Moderate) 0 0
Del Rosso (63)** 2022 Rosacea Treatment 18–80 years old United States (Multiple Sites) Doxycycline 40mg modified-release capsules once daily 84+ 300 12 (Mild or Moderate) 12 (Mild or Moderate) 0 0
Del Rosso (64) 2012 Rosacea Treatment Adults United States Doxycycline modified-release 40mg once daily (30mg immediate-release and 10 mg delayed-release) 84 1196 NR NR NR NR
Del Rosso (33) 2018 Acne Treatment 12+ years old United States Doxycycline hyclate delayed-release 100mg twice daily 84 175 26 (Mild or moderate) 26 (Mild or moderate) 1 4
Del Rosso (65) 2008 Rosacea Treatment 18+ years old United States Doxycycline 100mg daily or 40mg delayed-release daily (with topical metronidazole 1% gel) 112 91 16 18 6 9
Donta (29)** 2004 Gulf War Illness Treatment Adult veterans United States (Multiple sites) Doxycycline 200mg once daily 365 245 NR NR 12 7
Frenzel (30) 2008 Treatment of Brain Vascular Malformations 15–78 years old United States (California) Doxycycline 100mg twice a day 730 13 NR NR 1 2
Gollnick (48) 2010 Rosacea Treatment 19–91 years old Germany Doxycycline 100mg once daily for 14 days then 50mg once daily 84 143 NR NR NR NR
Golub (49) 2001 Chronic periodontitis treatment 18–75 years old United States Doxycycline 20mg once or twice daily 84 75 NR NR NR 3
Kaneshiro (39)** 2012 Prevention of Menstrual Bleeding 18–45 years old females United States Doxycycline 40mg once daily 84 32 NR NR NR 0
Kitchener (37) 2005 Malaria Prophylaxis Adult soldiers Australian soldiers settled in East Timor at risk for malaria Doxycycline (Dose not reported) 180+ 388 245* 78* 7* 1
Kus (66) 2005 Acne Treatment 18–30 years old Turkey Doxycycline 100mg BID for one month and then once daily for the next two months 90 26 NR NR NR NR
Layton (20) 1993 Acne Treatment 13–49 years old United Kingdom Doxycycline 150 or 200 mg/day 183 106 NR NR NR 37
Lee (50)** 2004 Chronic periodontitis treatment Adults South Korea Doxycycline hyclate 20mg twice daily 274 24 NR NR NR NR
Leijtens (67) 2019 Suppression of Prosthetic Joint Infection 40–88 years old Netherlands Doxycycline 100–200mg once daily 1157 14 NR NR NR 1
Leyden (42)** 2013 Acne Treatment 12–45 years old United States Doxycycline calcium 40–160mg (weight based) 84 190 NR NR NR 1
Lin (45) 2015 Graves Disease Treatment 18–60 years old China Doxycycline 50mg once daily 84 16 2 0 0 0
Makunde (46) 2006 Wuchereria Bancrofti Treatment 14–68 years old Tanzania Doxycycline 200mg once daily 60 19 7 0 0 0
Maleszka (68) 2011 Acne Treatment 14+ years old Poland and Croatia Doxycycline 100mg once daily 84 120 NR NR NR 0
Molina (3) 2017 STI Prophylaxis Adult Males France Single dose doxycycline 200mg within 24 hrs after sex and no later than 72 hrs 261+ 116 102 (Mild or Moderate) 102 (Mild or Moderate) 4 8
Moore (32)** 2015 Acne Treatment 12–59 years old United States Doxycycline 40–100mg once daily 112 440 NR NR 2 2
Naini (69) 2007 Diabetic Proteinuria Treatment 49–77 years old Iran Doxycycline 100mg once daily 61 35 NR NR 0 3
Novak (70) 2002 Chronic periodontitis treatment 29–45 years old United States Doxycycline hyclate 20mg twice daily 183 10 NR NR NR NR
Ohrt (38)** 1997 Malaria Prophylaxis Adult soldiers Indonesia Doxycycline 100mg once daily 91 67 NR NR NR 0
Pagès (71) 2002 Malaria Prophylaxis Adult soldiers French soldiers deployed in Gabon and Chad Doxycycline monohydrate 100mg once daily 120 275 NR NR NR 15
Pan (72)** 2022 Thyroid Disease Adults China Doxycycline 50mg once daily 84 50 1 0 0 0
Pang (73)** 1998 Malaria Prophylaxis 10–16 years old Thailand Doxycycline 25–100mg daily depending on weight 105 144 NR NR NR 0
Pang (74) 1987 Malaria Prophylaxis 10–15 years old Thailand Doxycycline 100mg once daily for those over 40kg; Doxycycline 50mg once daily for those less than 40kg 63 95 NR 0 0 0
Parish (75) 2005 Acne Treatment 14–36 years old United States Doxycycline hyclate 100mg twice a day 56 12 NR NR NR NR
Park (76) 2015 Rosacea Treatment 18+ years old South Korea Doxycycline 100mg twice a day 770 15 NR NR NR 0
Pfeffer (77) 2011 Rosacea Treatment Adults Germany Doxycycline 40mg once daily (slow-release form) 60+ 7 0 0 0 0
Pimenta (78) 2011 Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Treatment Adult Females Brazil Doxycycline 100mg once daily 180 41 NR NR NR 0
Pimenta (79) 2013 Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Treatment Adults Brazil Doxycycline 100mg once daily 365 41 NR NR NR 3
Popa (51) 2022 Colorectal Cancer Treatment Adults Romania Doxycycline (Dose not reported) 56 10 NR NR NR NR
Pradier (80) 2017 Suppression of Prosthetic Joint Infection Adults France Doxycycline 200mg once daily 508+ 39 NR NR NR 3
Pradier (81) 2018 Suppression of Prosthetic Joint Infection 18–91 years old France Doxycycline 200mg once daily 668 72 NR NR NR 6
Preshaw (31)** 2008 Chronic periodontitis treatment 24–81 years old United States Doxycycline monohydrate 40mg once daily (modified release) 274 133 79 (Mild or Moderate) 79 (Mild or Moderate) 9 7
Putschky (82) 2006 Reactive Arthritis Treatment 18–65 years old Germany Doxycycline 100mg twice a day 122 15 NR NR NR 0
Quarterman (83) 1997 Rosacea Treatment 31–66 years old Georgia Doxycycline 100mg once daily 84 39 NR NR NR NR
Sanchez (84)** 2005 Rosacea Treatment 18+ year old females United States and Puerto Rico Doxycycline hyclate 20mg twice daily for 12 weeks (with metronidazole 0.75% topical lotion) followed by 4 weeks of monotherapy with doxycycline hyclate 20mg 112 20 NR NR 0 0
Schlagenhauf (34) 2003 Malaria Prophylaxis 18–70 years old Travel clinics in Switzerland, Germany, and Israel Doxycycline monohydrate 100mg once daily 66 153 128 51 9 5
Sehgal (85) 2000 Leptospirosis prophylaxis 10+ years old India Doxycycline 200mg/week 84 386 NR NR NR 3
Smith (35) 2011 Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Adults United States Doxycycline 200mg once daily 90 484 31 53 26 35
Snijders (86)** 2011 Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Adults Netherlands Doxycycline monohydrate 100mg twice a day 168 116 NR NR NR 19
Sonmez (87) 2005 Malaria Prophylaxis Adult soldiers Turkish soldiers in Kabul, Afghanistan Doxycycline 100mg once daily 84 506 395 32 0 NR
Tan (47) 2014 Acne Treatment 12–35 years old Canada Doxycycline hyclate 200mg once daily (with adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel) 140 133 NR NR 0 6
Taylor (88)** 1999 Malaria Prophylaxis 18–55 years old Indonesia Doxycycline 100mg once daily 140 75 NR NR NR 1
Taylor (89) 2005 Wuchereria Bancrofti Treatment 15–68 year old males Tanzania Doxycycline 200mg once daily 56 34 8 NR NR 0
Thiboutot (90) 2005 Acne Treatment 12–36 years old United States (Multiple sites) Doxycycline 100mg once daily 84 467 NR NR 0 5
Thiboutot (40) 2009 Rosacea Treatment 19–83 years old United States Doxycycline monohydrate 100mg twice daily (with topical azelaic acid 15% gel) 28–84 172 19 8 4 12
Ullah (91) 2014 Acne Treatment 14–30 years old Pakistan Doxycycline 100mg once daily 90 193 NR NR NR 0
Ullah (92) 2022 Acne Treatment 12–24 years old Pakistan Doxycycline 100mg once daily 84 37 NR NR NR NR
van der Linden (41) 2016 Rosacea Treatment 18+ years old Netherlands Doxycycline 40mg once daily 112 40 23 (Mild or Moderate) 23 (Mild or Moderate) 0 3
Weiss (93) 1995 Malaria Prophylaxis 9–14 years old Kenya Doxycycline 50mg once daily 77 32 NR NR NR 2

NR=Not reported

1

Longer term was defined as 8+ weeks

*

Events (not individuals)

**

Included in the meta-analysis (N=18)

In terms of specific side-effects and adverse events, studies varied on how they reported the data (i.e., number of individuals with an adverse event versus the total number of adverse events). Studies reporting neurological effects (i.e., headache and dizziness) ranged from 0% to 30+% of individuals. The study with the highest reported neurological side effects per individual (i.e., 33%) evaluated individuals taking doxycycline as malaria prophylaxis and included side-effects of headaches, dizziness, dreams, somnolence, insomnia, palpitations, and sexual dysfunction (38). In this study, the severity of adverse events was not reported, but no individuals stopped the medication due to an adverse event. Reports of gastrointestinal side effects and adverse events (i.e., nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) ranged from 0% to 50+%. The majority of gastrointestinal side-effects were noted to be minor. No studies specifically looked at Clostridium difficile infection. In the study with the highest reported gastrointestinal side effects per individual (i.e., 53%), individuals were taking doxycycline to minimize endometrial bleeding and reported high rates of nausea, vomiting and diarrhea (39). However, this was a smaller study (N=32 individuals) and no severe adverse events were reported. Dermatologic and skin reactions (i.e., rashes) ranged from 0% to 38% per individual and varied in terms of severity and symptoms. The study with the highest reported dermatologic side effects (i.e., 38%) was small (N=32 individuals) and reported acne as the major symptom with no reports of severe adverse events (39). A number of studies also reported other side effects such as vaginal candidiasis which was reported in a small number of individuals (28,30,3943).

A total of eight studies mentioned evaluating at least one metabolic effect of doxycycline (i.e., weight, diabetes, cholesterol, and/or blood pressure) (26,28,31,4448). No studies comprehensively evaluated doxycycline on metabolism. Findings ranged from no changes in weight and blood pressure (31,45,46) to significant weight gain (23%) (44) and/or elevated blood pressure (26,28,48) and hypercholesterolemia (47). These studies were descriptive in nature with limited sample sizes and lack of control groups.

In addition, few (N=6) studies focused on the effect of doxycycline on the microbiome (i.e., oral, respiratory, gut) ranging from no changes to significant impacts. These included three studies of the effect of doxycycline on the resistance profile of oral microflora bacteria (two with no resistance found, and one study with resistance) (36,49,50), two descriptive studies evaluating variations of bacterial flora in the gastrointestinal tract (44,51), and one study which found significant increases in bacterial resistance in the respiratory tract after doxycycline use (52). However, these studies were largely descriptive in nature and limited by sample size and lack of control groups.

Meta-analysis Results

From the 67 studies included in the review, we limited the meta-analysis to only placebo-controlled studies with complete data reported for both arms (N = 18). For each type of adverse event, the number of studies included in the analysis varied. For example, eleven studies reported neurological adverse events while only nine studies reported dermatological adverse events (Table 2). There was a significant difference in experiencing gastrointestinal and dermatological adverse events between the treatment and placebo groups (Table 2).

TABLE 2:

Relative risk of adverse events between doxycycline and placebo arms of randomized controlled trials

Outcome κ Relative risk (95% CI) I2% P-value
Included RCT studies
 Any AE 9 1.03 (0.89, 1.21) 59.6 0.66
 Severe AE 12 0.83 (0.59, 1.16) 2.20 0.28
 Neurological AE 11 0.88 (0.73, 1.05) 0.90 0.15
 Gastrointestinal AE 12 1.68 (1.19, 2.38) 72.2 <0.01
 Dermatological AE 9 3.55 (1.39, 9.01) 45.9 0.01
 Dropped due to AE 18 1.62 (1.12, 2.34) 7.50 0.01
100 – 200 mg dosages
 Any AE 3 1.35 (0.69, 2.64) 74.7 0.38
 Severe AE 6 0.94 (0.65, 1.34) 0.00 0.73
 Neurological AE 5 0.99 (0.97, 1.02) 0.17 0.68
 Gastrointestinal AE 6 1.78 (1.16, 2.74) 81.9 0.01
 Dermatological AE 4 5.52 (1.75, 17.42) 68.3 <0.01
 Dropped due to AE 10 1.82 (1.06, 3.11) 20.9 0.03

κ = number of studies; AE = adverse event; I2 variation across studies because of heterogeneity rather than chance; CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial

Participants in the doxycycline treatment group had an increased risk of experiencing gastrointestinal [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.19, 2.38); p-value < 0.01] and dermatological [RR: 3.55 (95% CI: 1.39, 9.01); p-value = 0.01] adverse events compared to participants in the placebo control group. Similarly, for studies that reported dosages of 100–200 mg of doxycycline, participants in the doxycycline group had and increased risk of experiencing gastrointestinal [RR: 1.78 (95% CI: 1.16, 2.74); p-value = 0.01] and dermatological [RR: 5.52 (95% CI: 1.75, 17.42); p-value < 0.01] adverse events compared to the placebo group (Figure 2). No significant differences were observed for any, severe, or neurological adverse events for all included studies and for studies that reported administering doses of 100–200 mg of doxycycline.

FIGURE 2:

FIGURE 2:

FIGURE 2:

Forest plots of (A) gastrointestinal, (B) dermatologic and (C) neurological adverse events among those taking 100–200mg of doxycycline daily compared to placebo.

*AE=Adverse Events, CI=Confidence Intervals, RE=Random Effects

Finally, we observed differences in participants withdrawing from the trial between the groups. Participants were more likely to withdraw due to adverse events in the doxycycline group compared to the placebo group for all included studies and among studies that reported dosages of 100 – 200 mg; RR: 1.62 (95% CI: 1.12, 2.34); p-value = 0.01 and RR: 1.82 (95% CI: 1.06, 3.11); p-value = 0.03, respectively. Observed heterogeneity as measured by I2 across all analyses was 1–82% with a median of 33%. In analysis of outcomes where heterogeneity was high (45–82%), one to two studies (outliers) could explain the between-study variance not from chance alone.

DISCUSSION

This is the most comprehensive systematic review to date of longer-term doxycycline use and risk of adverse events. Studies included in the review were diverse in terms of population and reason for doxycycline use. Evaluation of adverse events was also limited by lack of standardized reporting methods leading to different definitions and approaches to analyzing adverse events. Overall, studies on longer-term doxycycline use reported 0% to over 50% adverse events ranging from mild to severe. Most common adverse events included gastrointestinal (i.e., nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain), dermatologic (i.e., rash), and neurological (i.e., headache and dizziness) symptoms. However, discontinuation of doxycycline due to adverse events was relatively uncommon in most studies, though more likely among those on doxycycline than those taking a placebo. The meta-analysis of placebo controlled clinical trials revealed an increased risk of individuals on doxycycline experiencing gastrointestinal or dermatological adverse events compared to placebo. In summary, adverse events related to longer-term doxycycline use are commonly reported, but serious side-effects are rare.

Although common side-effects of doxycycline have been well described, longer-term doxycycline use could have other effects including on the microbiome and/or metabolism. No comprehensive evaluation of longer-term doxycycline use has rigorously evaluated changes in the microbiome or metabolism. Longer-term use (i.e., 24 months) of lower dose doxycycline (i.e., doses ranging from 10mg a day to 20mg twice a day) does not seem to lead to an effect on the composition of doxycycline resistant species of the intestinal or vaginal flora (53,54), or increase the risk of C. difficile infection (55). In the current review, metabolic outcomes were not routinely evaluated. Studies that did include aspects of metabolism did not rigorously or comprehensively evaluate outcomes. Further research is needed to identify longer-term impact of doxycycline use on metabolism.

In the context of chemoprophylaxis for bacterial STIs, the current study has several important implications. First, severe adverse events due to longer-term doxycycline use are uncommon which is reassuring. Second, further study is needed on other possible longer-term side-effects including adverse impacts on metabolism. Third, all the reviewed studies focused on daily doxycycline use. Current bacterial STI chemoprophylaxis studies have evaluated doxycycline use as PEP which would generally represent intermittent, not daily use. We would hypothesize that intermittent doxycycline use would lead to fewer side-effects in general, although how much less is unclear. Previous studies have and other studies are currently evaluating daily doxycycline use as PrEP. Doxycycline as PEP for bacterial STI prophylaxis may be ideal in in terms of balancing risk for adverse events as well as antimicrobial resistance concerns compared to daily use as PrEP though further investigation is warranted.

Available studies varied in terms of study population, dosing, comparator drugs, co-morbidities, and outcomes evaluated. Importantly, the measures used to evaluate adverse events were not standardized requiring us to reduce the number of studies included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated an increased risk of individuals on doxycycline experiencing gastrointestinal or dermatological adverse events compared to placebo which is consistent with the systematic review and clinical experience. Lack of systematic approaches in evaluating adverse events led to further challenges. In addition, the current study did not evaluate adverse pregnancy outcomes related to doxycycline use. Despite these challenges, the current study provides important insights into the safety of longer-term doxycycline in the context of STI chemoprophylaxis.

In conclusion, a significant number of studies have evaluated longer-term (8+ weeks) doxycycline use. Mild to moderate side-effects are common including gastrointestinal, dermatologic and potentially neurological. More serious side-effects are less common but do occur. There is likely a dose dependent relationship on side-effects. Of note, almost all studies evaluated daily doxycycline use. It is unknown whether episodic use would lead to fewer side-effects or adverse events.

Footnotes

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Luetkemeyer AF, Donnell D, Dombrowski JC, Cohen S, Grabow C, Brown CE, et al. Postexposure Doxycycline to Prevent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections. N Engl J Med. 2023. Apr 6;388(14):1296–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Molina JM, Charreau I, Chidiac C, Pialoux G, Cua E, Delaugerre C, et al. Post-exposure prophylaxis with doxycycline to prevent sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men: an open-label randomised substudy of the ANRS IPERGAY trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018. Mar;18(3):308–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Molina Jean-Michel, Bercot Beatrice, Assoumou Lambert, Michele Algarte-Genin, Rubenstein Emma, Pialoux Gilles, et al. ANRS 174 DOXYVAC: An Open-Label Randomized Trial to Prevent STIs in MSM on PrEP. CROI [Internet]. 2023. Feb 19;Seattle, Washington. Available from: https://www.croiconference.org/abstract/anrs-174-doxyvac-an-open-label-randomized-trial-to-prevent-stis-in-msm-on-prep/ [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bolan RK, Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Flynn RP, Leibowitz AA, Klausner JD. Doxycycline prophylaxis to reduce incident syphilis among HIV-infected men who have sex with men who continue to engage in high-risk sex: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Sex Transm Dis. 2015. Feb;42(2):98–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stewart Jenell, Oware Kevin, Donnell Deborah, Violette Lauren R., Odoyo Josephine, Scoville Caitlin W., et al. Doxycycline Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for Prevention of STIs among Cisgender Women. CROI. 2023. Feb 19;Seattle, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stewart J, Oware K, Donnell D, Violette L, Odoyo J, Simoni J, et al. Self-reported adherence to event-driven doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis for sexually transmitted infection prevention among cisgender women. STI and HIV 2023 World Congress, Chicago, IL. 2023. Jul 24; [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Binh VQ, Chinh NT, Thanh NX, Cuong BT, Quang NN, Dai B, et al. Sex affects the steady-state pharmacokinetics of primaquine but not doxycycline in healthy subjects. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009. Nov;81(5):747–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peyriere H, Makinson A, Marchandin H, Reynes J. Doxycycline in the management of sexually transmitted infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018. Mar 1;73(3):553–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Farrah G, Tan E. The use of oral antibiotics in treating acne vulgaris: a new approach. Dermatol Ther. 2016. Sep;29(5):377–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Twartz JC, Shirai A, Selvaraju G, Saunders JP, Huxsoll DL, Groves MG. Doxycycline propylaxis for human scrub typhus. J Infect Dis. 1982. Dec;146(6):811–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nadelman RB, Nowakowski J, Fish D, Falco RC, Freeman K, McKenna D, et al. Prophylaxis with single-dose doxycycline for the prevention of Lyme disease after an Ixodes scapularis tick bite. N Engl J Med. 2001. Jul 12;345(2):79–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Binenbaum Y, Ben-Ami R, Baneth G, Langford B, Negev Y, Friedlander E, et al. Single Dose of Doxycycline for the Prevention of Tick-borne Relapsing Fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. Oct 23;71(7):1768–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moran-Gilad J, Levine H, Schwartz E, Bartal C, Huerta-Hartal M, Schwaber MJ, et al. Postexposure prophylaxis of tick-borne relapsing fever: lessons learned from recent outbreaks in Israel. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013. Nov;13(11):791–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schneider MC, Velasco-Hernandez J, Min KD, Leonel DG, Baca-Carrasco D, Gompper ME, et al. The Use of Chemoprophylaxis after Floods to Reduce the Occurrence and Impact of Leptospirosis Outbreaks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. Jun 3;14(6):E594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takafuji ET, Kirkpatrick JW, Miller RN, Karwacki JJ, Kelley PW, Gray MR, et al. An efficacy trial of doxycycline chemoprophylaxis against leptospirosis. N Engl J Med. 1984. Feb 23;310(8):497–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wormser GP. Doxycycline for Prevention of Spirochetal Infections: Status Report. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. Nov 5;71(8):2014–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wormser GP, Warshafsky S, Visintainer P. Aggregation of data from 4 clinical studies demonstrating efficacy of single-dose doxycycline postexposure for prevention of the spirochetal infections: Lyme disease, syphilis, and tick-borne relapsing fever. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021. Apr;99(4):115293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tan KR, Magill AJ, Parise ME, Arguin PM, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Doxycycline for malaria chemoprophylaxis and treatment: report from the CDC expert meeting on malaria chemoprophylaxis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011. Apr;84(4):517–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Layton AM, Cunliffe WJ. Phototoxic eruptions due to doxycycline--a dose-related phenomenon. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1993. Sep;18(5):425–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sloan B, Scheinfeld N. The use and safety of doxycycline hyclate and other second-generation tetracyclines. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008. Sep;7(5):571–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith K, Leyden JJ. Safety of doxycycline and minocycline: a systematic review. Clin Ther. 2005. Sep;27(9):1329–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009. Aug 18;151(4):W65–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Soft [Internet]. 2010. [cited 2023 Jun 18];36(3). Available from: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/ [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta‐Analysis [Internet]. 1st ed. Wiley; 2009. [cited 2023 Jun 18]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470743386 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Katz BP, Lane KA, Buckwalter KA, Yocum DE, et al. Effects of doxycycline on progression of osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005. Jul;52(7):2015–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Berende A, ter Hofstede HJM, Vos FJ, van Middendorp H, Vogelaar ML, Tromp M, et al. Randomized Trial of Longer-Term Therapy for Symptoms Attributed to Lyme Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016. Mar 31;374(13):1209–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Del Rosso JQ, Webster GF, Jackson M, Rendon M, Rich P, Torok H, et al. Two randomized phase III clinical trials evaluating anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline (40-mg doxycycline, USP capsules) administered once daily for treatment of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007. May;56(5):791–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Donta ST, Engel CC, Collins JF, Baseman JB, Dever LL, Taylor T, et al. Benefits and harms of doxycycline treatment for Gulf War veterans’ illnesses: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004. Jul 20;141(2):85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Frenzel T, Lee CZ, Kim H, Quinnine NJ, Hashimoto T, Lawton MT, et al. Feasibility of minocycline and doxycycline use as potential vasculostatic therapy for brain vascular malformations: pilot study of adverse events and tolerance. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(1–2):157–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Preshaw PM, Novak MJ, Mellonig J, Magnusson I, Polson A, Giannobile WV, et al. Modified-release subantimicrobial dose doxycycline enhances scaling and root planing in subjects with periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 2008. Mar;79(3):440–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moore A, Ling M, Bucko A, Manna V, Rueda MJ. Efficacy and Safety of Subantimicrobial Dose, Modified-Release Doxycycline 40 mg Versus Doxycycline 100 mg Versus Placebo for the treatment of Inflammatory Lesions in Moderate and Severe Acne: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015. Jun;14(6):581–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Del Rosso JQ, Stein Gold L, Johnson SM, Rueda MJ, Baldwin H, Lain EL, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Adapalene 0.3%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel Plus Oral Doxycycline in Subjects With Severe Inflammatory Acne Who Are Candidates for Oral Isotretinoin. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018. Mar 1;17(3):264–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schlagenhauf P, Tschopp A, Johnson R, Nothdurft HD, Beck B, Schwartz E, et al. Tolerability of malaria chemoprophylaxis in non-immune travellers to sub-Saharan Africa: multicentre, randomised, double blind, four arm study. BMJ. 2003. Nov 8;327(7423):1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Smith CJ, Sayles H, Mikuls TR, Michaud K. Minocycline and doxycycline therapy in community patients with rheumatoid arthritis: prescribing patterns, patient-level determinants of use, and patient-reported side effects. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Caton JG, Ciancio SG, Blieden TM, Bradshaw M, Crout RJ, Hefti AF, et al. Treatment with subantimicrobial dose doxycycline improves the efficacy of scaling and root planing in patients with adult periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2000. Apr;71(4):521–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kitchener SJ, Nasveld PE, Gregory RM, Edstein MD. Mefloquine and doxycycline malaria prophylaxis in Australian soldiers in East Timor. Med J Aust. 2005. Feb 21;182(4):168–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ohrt C, Richie TL, Widjaja H, Shanks GD, Fitriadi J, Fryauff DJ, et al. Mefloquine compared with doxycycline for the prophylaxis of malaria in Indonesian soldiers. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1997. Jun 15;126(12):963–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kaneshiro B, Edelman A, Carlson NE, Nichols M, Forbes MM, Jensen J. A randomized controlled trial of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline to prevent unscheduled bleeding with continuous oral contraceptive pill use. Contraception. 2012. Apr;85(4):351–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thiboutot DM, Fleischer AB, Del Rosso JQ, Rich P. A multicenter study of topical azelaic acid 15% gel in combination with oral doxycycline as initial therapy and azelaic acid 15% gel as maintenance monotherapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009. Jul;8(7):639–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van der Linden MMD, van Ratingen AR, van Rappard DC, Nieuwenburg SA, Spuls PI. DOMINO, doxycycline 40 mg vs. minocycline 100 mg in the treatment of rosacea: a randomized, single-blinded, noninferiority trial, comparing efficacy and safety. Br J Dermatol. 2017. Jun;176(6):1465–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Leyden JJ, Bruce S, Lee CS, Ling M, Sheth PB, Stewart DM, et al. A randomized, phase 2, dose-ranging study in the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory facial acne vulgaris with doxycycline calcium. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013. Jun 1;12(6):658–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Baxter BT, Pearce WH, Waltke EA, Littooy FN, Hallett JW, Kent KC, et al. Prolonged administration of doxycycline in patients with small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: report of a prospective (Phase II) multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2002. Jul;36(1):1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Angelakis E, Million M, Kankoe S, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Giorgi R, et al. Abnormal weight gain and gut microbiota modifications are side effects of long-term doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014. Jun;58(6):3342–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 45.Lin M, Mao Y, Ai S, Liu G, Zhang J, Yan J, et al. Efficacy of Subantimicrobial Dose Doxycycline for Moderate-to-Severe and Active Graves’ Orbitopathy. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:285698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Makunde WH, Kamugisha LM, Makunde RA, Malecela MN, Kitua AY. Hospital-based safety and tolerability study to assess efficacy of oral doxycycline in the treatment of Wuchereria bancrofti infection in north-eastern Tanzania. Tanzan Health Res Bull. 2006. Sep;8(3):128–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tan J, Humphrey S, Vender R, Barankin B, Gooderham M, Kerrouche N, et al. A treatment for severe nodular acne: a randomized investigator-blinded, controlled, noninferiority trial comparing fixed-dose adapalene/benzoyl peroxide plus doxycycline vs. oral isotretinoin. Br J Dermatol. 2014. Dec;171(6):1508–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gollnick H, Blume-Peytavi U, Szabó EL, Meyer KG, Hauptmann P, Popp G, et al. Systemic isotretinoin in the treatment of rosacea - doxycycline- and placebo-controlled, randomized clinical study. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010. Jul;8(7):505–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Golub LM, McNamara TF, Ryan ME, Kohut B, Blieden T, Payonk G, et al. Adjunctive treatment with subantimicrobial doses of doxycycline: effects on gingival fluid collagenase activity and attachment loss in adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2001. Feb;28(2):146–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee JY, Lee YM, Shin SY, Seol YJ, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, et al. Effect of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline as an effective adjunct to scaling and root planing. J Periodontol. 2004. Nov;75(11):1500–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Popa CM, Ianosi SL, Dorobantu SC, Saftoiu A. Gut Microbiota Imbalance in Metastatic Colorectal Patients Treated With EGFRI and Long-Term Antibiotic Therapy for Cutaneous Toxicity: A Pilot Study. Cureus. 2022. May;14(5):e25007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brill SE, Law M, El-Emir E, Allinson JP, James P, Maddox V, et al. Effects of different antibiotic classes on airway bacteria in stable COPD using culture and molecular techniques: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2015. Oct;70(10):930–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Thomas J, Walker C, Bradshaw M. Long-term use of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline does not lead to changes in antimicrobial susceptibility. J Periodontol. 2000. Sep;71(9):1472–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Walker C, Preshaw PM, Novak J, Hefti AF, Bradshaw M, Powala C. Long-term treatment with sub-antimicrobial dose doxycycline has no antibacterial effect on intestinal flora. J Clin Periodontol. 2005. Nov;32(11):1163–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Turner RB, Smith CB, Martello JL, Slain D. Role of doxycycline in Clostridium difficile infection acquisition. Ann Pharmacother. 2014. Jun;48(6):772–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Akhyani M, Ehsani AH, Ghiasi M, Jafari AK. Comparison of efficacy of azithromycin vs. doxycycline in the treatment of rosacea: a randomized open clinical trial. Int J Dermatol. 2008. Mar;47(3):284–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Alexis AF, Webster G, Preston NJ, Caveney SW, Gottschalk RW. Effectiveness and safety of once-daily doxycycline capsules as monotherapy in patients with rosacea: an analysis by Fitzpatrick skin type. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012. Oct;11(10):1219–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Andersen SL, Oloo AJ, Gordon DM, Ragama OB, Aleman GM, Berman JD, et al. Successful double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled field trial of azithromycin and doxycycline as prophylaxis for malaria in western Kenya. Clin Infect Dis. 1998. Jan;26(1):146–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Arman A, Demirseren DD, Takmaz T. Treatment of ocular rosacea: comparative study of topical cyclosporine and oral doxycycline. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8(3):544–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Babaeinejad S, Khodaeiani E, Fouladi RF. Comparison of therapeutic effects of oral doxycycline and azithromycin in patients with moderate acne vulgaris: What is the role of age? J Dermatolog Treat. 2011. Aug;22(4):206–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Baudon D, Martet G, Pascal B, Bernard J, Keundjian A, Laroche R. Efficacy of daily antimalarial chemoprophylaxis in tropical Africa using either doxycycline or chloroquine-proguanil; a study conducted in 1996 in the French Army. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93(3):302–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Del Rosso JQ, Johnson SM, Schlesinger T, Green L, Sanchez N, Lain E, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Trifarotene Plus Doxycycline for Severe Acne Vulgaris. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022. Jul;15(7):E53–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Del Rosso JQ, Brantman S, Baldwin H. Long-term inflammatory rosacea management with subantibiotic dose oral doxycycline 40 mg modified-release capsules once daily. Dermatol Ther. 2022. Jan;35(1):e15180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Del Rosso JQ, Preston NJ, Caveney SW, Gottschalk RW. Effectiveness and safety of modified-release doxycycline capsules once daily for papulopustular rosacea monotherapy results from a large community-based trial in subgroups based on gender. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012. Jun;11(6):703–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Del Rosso JQ, Schlessinger J, Werschler P. Comparison of anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline versus doxycycline 100 mg in the treatment of rosacea. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008. Jun;7(6):573–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kus S, Yucelten D, Aytug A. Comparison of efficacy of azithromycin vs. doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005. May;30(3):215–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Leijtens B, Weerwag L, Schreurs BW, Kullberg BJ, Rijnen W. Clinical Outcome of Antibiotic Suppressive Therapy in Patients with a Prosthetic Joint Infection after Hip Replacement. J Bone Jt Infect. 2019;4(6):268–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Maleszka R, Turek-Urasinska K, Oremus M, Vukovic J, Barsic B. Pulsed azithromycin treatment is as effective and safe as 2-week-longer daily doxycycline treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study. Skinmed. 2011;9(2):86–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Naini AE, Harandi AA, Moghtaderi J, Bastani B, Amiran A. Doxycycline: a pilot study to reduce diabetic proteinuria. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27(3):269–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Novak MJ, Johns LP, Miller RC, Bradshaw MH. Adjunctive benefits of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline in the management of severe, generalized, chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2002. Jul;73(7):762–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pagès F, Boutin JP, Meynard JB, Keundjian A, Ryfer S, Giurato L, et al. Tolerability of doxycycline monohydrate salt vs. chloroquine-proguanil in malaria chemoprophylaxis. Trop Med Int Health. 2002. Nov;7(11):919–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pan Y, Chen YX, Zhang J, Lin ML, Liu GM, Xu XL, et al. Doxycycline vs Placebo at 12 Weeks in Patients With Mild Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022. Nov 1;140(11):1076–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pang L, Limsomwong N, Singharaj P. Prophylactic treatment of vivax and falciparum malaria with low-dose doxycycline. J Infect Dis. 1988. Nov;158(5):1124–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pang LW, Limsomwong N, Boudreau EF, Singharaj P. Doxycycline prophylaxis for falciparum malaria. Lancet. 1987. May 23;1(8543):1161–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Parish LC, Parish JL, Routh HB, Witkowski JA. The treatment of acne vulgaris with low dosage doxycycline. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2005;13(3):156–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Park JM, Mun JH, Song M, Kim HS, Kim BS, Kim MB, et al. Propranolol, doxycycline and combination therapy for the treatment of rosacea. J Dermatol. 2015. Jan;42(1):64–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pfeffer I, Borelli C, Zierhut M, Schaller M. Treatment of ocular rosacea with 40 mg doxycycline in a slow release form. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2011. Nov;9(11):904–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pimenta SP, Baldi BG, Acencio MMP, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CRR. Doxycycline use in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: safety and efficacy in metalloproteinase blockade. J Bras Pneumol. 2011;37(4):424–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pimenta SP, Baldi BG, Kairalla RA, Carvalho CRR. Doxycycline use in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: biomarkers and pulmonary function response. J Bras Pneumol. 2013;39(1):5–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pradier M, Nguyen S, Robineau O, Titecat M, Blondiaux N, Valette M, et al. Suppressive antibiotic therapy with oral doxycycline for Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection: a retrospective study of 39 patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017. Sep;50(3):447–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pradier M, Robineau O, Boucher A, Titecat M, Blondiaux N, Valette M, et al. Suppressive antibiotic therapy with oral tetracyclines for prosthetic joint infections: a retrospective study of 78 patients. Infection. 2018. Feb;46(1):39–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Putschky N, Pott HG, Kuipers JG, Zeidler H, Hammer M, Wollenhaupt J. Comparing 10-day and 4-month doxycycline courses for treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis-reactive arthritis: a prospective, double-blind trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006. Nov;65(11):1521–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Quarterman MJ, Johnson DW, Abele DC, Lesher JL, Hull DS, Davis LS. Ocular rosacea. Signs, symptoms, and tear studies before and after treatment with doxycycline. Arch Dermatol. 1997. Jan;133(1):49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sanchez J, Somolinos AL, Almodóvar PI, Webster G, Bradshaw M, Powala C. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the combined effect of doxycycline hyclate 20-mg tablets and metronidazole 0.75% topical lotion in the treatment of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005. Nov;53(5):791–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sehgal SC, Sugunan AP, Murhekar MV, Sharma S, Vijayachari P. Randomized controlled trial of doxycycline prophylaxis against leptospirosis in an endemic area. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000. Feb;13(4):249–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Snijders GF, van den Ende CHM, van Riel PLCM, van den Hoogen FHJ, den Broeder AA, NOAC study group. The effects of doxycycline on reducing symptoms in knee osteoarthritis: results from a triple-blinded randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011. Jul;70(7):1191–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sonmez A, Harlak A, Kilic S, Polat Z, Hayat L, Keskin O, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of doxycycline and mefloquine in malaria prophylaxis of the ISAF troops in Afghanistan. J Infect. 2005. Oct;51(3):253–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Taylor WR, Richie TL, Fryauff DJ, Picarima H, Ohrt C, Tang D, et al. Malaria prophylaxis using azithromycin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Clin Infect Dis. 1999. Jan;28(1):74–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Taylor MJ, Makunde WH, McGarry HF, Turner JD, Mand S, Hoerauf A. Macrofilaricidal activity after doxycycline treatment of Wuchereria bancrofti: a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005. Jun 18;365(9477):2116–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Thiboutot DM, Shalita AR, Yamauchi PS, Dawson C, Arsonnaud S, Kang S, et al. Combination therapy with adapalene gel 0.1% and doxycycline for severe acne vulgaris: a multicenter, investigator-blind, randomized, controlled study. Skinmed. 2005;4(3):138–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ullah G, Noor SM, Bhatti Z, Ahmad M, Bangash AR. Comparison of oral azithromycin with oral doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(1):64–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ullah G, Ali F, Paracha MM, Noor SM, Naeem J. Comparison Of Efficacy Of Topical Adapalene Plus Oral Azithromycin And Topical Adapalene Plus Oral Doxycycline In Treatment Of Acne Vulgaris. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022;34(4):782–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Weiss WR, Oloo AJ, Johnson A, Koech D, Hoffman SL. Daily primaquine is effective for prophylaxis against falciparum malaria in Kenya: comparison with mefloquine, doxycycline, and chloroquine plus proguanil. J Infect Dis. 1995. Jun;171(6):1569–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES