Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2023 Sep 22;34(6):538–547. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000428

Table 3.

Unstandardized results of the indirect effects model illustrating the associations between housing instability, food insecurity, survival sex engagement, and meth use

95% CI
Outcome Predictor b SE p Lower Upper

Survival Sex Engagement
Food Insecurity .47*** .133 .000 .208 .737
Homelessness Status 1.29 .679 .057 −.002 2.688
Age .12 .068 .066 −.009 .259
Sexual Orientation .18 .675 .795 −1.252 1.419
Employment .19 .670 .773 −1.103 1.510
HIV Status −1.20** .451 .008 −2.129 −.347
Meth(amphetamine) Use
Food Insecurity −.08 .444 .851 −.933 .826
Homelessness Status 4.48 2.340 .055 −.606 8.364
Engaging in Survival Sex .50* .246 .041 .009 .971
Age .18 .258 .479 −.338 .694
Sexual Orientation −.50 2.125 .816 −4.895 3.654
Employment 3.21 1.957 .101 −.635 6.986

Note. b = unstandardized beta, SE=standard error, p = p-value,

*

p <.05;

**

p <.01;

***

p<.001, 95% CI = 95% confidence intervals.