Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 May 29;26(4):687–694. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12677

TABLE 2.

Pearson correlation test showing relationship between 3D MP angle with other evaluated characteristics (n = 60).

MP angle
Condylar height (mm)
r −.112
P value .393
Ramus height (mm)
r −.404*
P value .001
Condylar plus ramus height (mm)
r −.387*
P value .002
Condylar width (mm)
r −.469*
P value <.001
Symphysis width (mm)
r −.298*
P value .021
Mandibular length (Go-Me) (mm)
r −.438*
P value <.001
Palatal heigth (mm)
r −.208
P value .110
Gonial angle (°)
r .557*
P value <.001
Symphysis inclination angle (°)
r −.287*
P value .026
Palatal plane angle (°)
r .323*
P value .012
Palatal-mandibular angle(°)
r .783*
P value <.001
*

Statistically significant difference at α = .05%.