Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 2;83(19):3264–3283. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-0705

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with MBC who received abemaciclib after disease progression on a prior CDK4/6i (N=52)

Parameter n (%)*
Mean age (range), y
 Original diagnosis 47.5 (29–75)
 Diagnosis of metastasis 53 (35–75)
Sex
 Female 50 (96)
 Male 2 (4)
Race/ethnicity
 White 38 (73)
 Black 4 (8)
 Hispanic 2 (4)
 Asian/Pacific Islander 5 (10)
 Other 3 (6)
Abemaciclib sequence following prior CDK4/6i
 Sequential 18 (35)
 Non-sequential 34 (65)
Abemaciclib treatment course
 Monotherapy 15 (29)
 Endocrine partner 37 (71)
  Aromatase inhibitor 3 (6)
  Fulvestrant 34 (65)
Clinical outcome on abemaciclib at data cutoff (July 1, 2022)
 On treatment 13 (25)
 Discontinued, progressive disease 39 (75)
Prior CDK4/6i treatment course
 Ribociclib 1 (2)
 Palbociclib 51 (98)
 Endocrine partner
  Aromatase inhibitor 34 (65)
  SERD
    Fulvestrant 17 (33)
    other 1 (2)
Mean duration of CDK4/6i treatment, months (range)
 First CDK4/6i (palbociclib or ribociclib) 11.1 (1 – 43.6)
 Second CDK4/6i (abemaciclib) 7.6 (0.9 – 29.3)
Other treatment lines prior to abemaciclib, metastatic setting (nonsequential cohort)
 Chemotherapy 26 (50)
 Everolimus 11 (21)
 Tamoxifen 7 (14)
 Alpelisib 2 (4)
 Bevacizumab 1 (2)
 Olaparib 1 (2)
 Megestrol 1 (2)
*

Data are presented as n(%) unless otherwise specified