Table 3.
Characteristics of the included studies.
Intervention | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Sample | Age | Gender | Chanel | Visit | Duration | Provider | Approach | CG | Results |
18 | 457 (IG = 230; CG = 227) | 78 (±7.92) | 75.1% females | Home and telephone calls | 8 session (3 month) | First: 1 h. Next: 1 h. Telep.: 20 m. |
Nurse and social and community workes | Classic | Usual care | Improve psychological health |
19 | 457 (IG = 230; CG = 227) | 78 (±7.92) | 75.1% females | Home and telephone calls | 8 session (3 month) | First: 1 h. Next: 1 h. Telep.: 20 m. |
Nurse and social and community workes | Classic | Usual care | Improves psychological and physical health |
20 | 31 (IG = 15; CG = 16) | 73.9 (± 6.4) | 61.6% females | Home and telephone calls | 48session (4 month) | 30–40 m. | Online | Classic | Usual care | Improve cognitive, not brain health |
21 | 540 (IG = 271; CG = 269) | – | – | Home and telephone calls | 8 session (3 month) | First: 1 h. Next: 1 h. Telep.: 20 m. |
Nurse | Classic | Usual care | Reducing service cost. Program cost effective. |
22 | 312 (IG = 158; CG = 154) | IG = 78.06 (± 6.3) CG = 79.06 (± 6.6) |
62.2% females | Home | 6 month | – | Volunteers | Classic | Usual care | More care visit, fewer hospital admission |
23 | 136 (IG = 69; CG = 67) | 58.8% females | Local venue and home | 8 session (2 month) + 8 follow session | 1 h/session +30 m/day follow | Nurse | Classic | Not education program | Improves healthy lifestyle | |
24 | 262 (IG = 136; CG = 126) | IG = 72.9 CG = 71.3 |
74.8% females | Local venue | 20session (4 month) | – | Ocupattional therapy | Classic | Usual care | Intervention not effective for UK |
25 | 60 (IG = 30; CG = 30) | IG = 74 (±4.9) | 66.6% females | University | 24session (6 month) | 90 m. | Physic therapist and educators | Classic | Didactic teaching method | Improves healthy lifestyle |
IG, intervention group; CG, control group; h, hour; m, minute.