Table 2.
n (%) | |
---|---|
Grading | |
G2 | 27 (49.1) |
G3 | 6 (10.9) |
No tumor | 19 (34.5) |
Not evaluable | 2 (3.6) |
Not applicablea | 1 (1.8) |
Pathological T stage | |
ypT0 | 21 (38.2) |
ypT1 | 4 (7.3) |
ypT2 | 15 (27.3) |
ypT3 | 13 (23.6) |
ypT4 | 1 (1.8) |
Not applicablea | 1 (1.8) |
Pathological N stageb | |
ypN0 | 46 (83.6) |
ypN1 | 6 (10.9) |
ypN2 | 2 (3.6) |
Not applicablea | 1 (1.8) |
Total resected nodesb | |
Median [IQ-IIIQ] | 15.5 [11-19] |
Min-max | 0-34 |
Not applicablea | 1 |
Distal and proximal marginsb | |
R0 | 53 (96.4) |
R1 | 1 (1.8) |
Not applicablea | 1 (1.8) |
Circumferential resection margins | |
Positive (≤1 mm) | 2 (3.6) |
Negative (>1 mm) | 52 (94.5) |
Not applicablea | 1 (1.8) |
Pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0) | |
Yes | 19 (34.5) |
No | 36 (65.5) |
TRG | |
0 | 19 (34.5) |
1 | 14 (25.5) |
2 | 16 (29.1) |
3 | 5 (9.1) |
Not applicablea | 1 (1.8) |
Percentages may not equal 100 due to rounding.
IQ, first quartile; IIIQ, third quartile; TRG, tumor regression grading.
One patient did not have surgery due to disease progression during the neoadjuvant treatment.
Parameters assessed by local review.