Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 27;8(5):101824. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101824

Table 2.

Pathology findings according to central review (n = 55)

n (%)
Grading
 G2 27 (49.1)
 G3 6 (10.9)
 No tumor 19 (34.5)
 Not evaluable 2 (3.6)
 Not applicablea 1 (1.8)
Pathological T stage
 ypT0 21 (38.2)
 ypT1 4 (7.3)
 ypT2 15 (27.3)
 ypT3 13 (23.6)
 ypT4 1 (1.8)
 Not applicablea 1 (1.8)
Pathological N stageb
 ypN0 46 (83.6)
 ypN1 6 (10.9)
 ypN2 2 (3.6)
 Not applicablea 1 (1.8)
Total resected nodesb
 Median [IQ-IIIQ] 15.5 [11-19]
 Min-max 0-34
 Not applicablea 1
Distal and proximal marginsb
 R0 53 (96.4)
 R1 1 (1.8)
 Not applicablea 1 (1.8)
Circumferential resection margins
 Positive (≤1 mm) 2 (3.6)
 Negative (>1 mm) 52 (94.5)
 Not applicablea 1 (1.8)
Pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0)
 Yes 19 (34.5)
 No 36 (65.5)
TRG
 0 19 (34.5)
 1 14 (25.5)
 2 16 (29.1)
 3 5 (9.1)
 Not applicablea 1 (1.8)

Percentages may not equal 100 due to rounding.

IQ, first quartile; IIIQ, third quartile; TRG, tumor regression grading.

a

One patient did not have surgery due to disease progression during the neoadjuvant treatment.

b

Parameters assessed by local review.