Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 24;2023(10):CD013584. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013584.pub2

Farag 2017 (B).

Study characteristics
Methods Prospective, randomised study
Run‐in period: not specified. Received January 2016; revised February 2016
Number of study centres: not specified. Authors affiliated with institutions in Germany and the UK
Participants 60 consecutive adults undergoing CABG 
Mean age: 63.65 years
Sex (female/male ratio): 13.33%
No high‐risk population
Inclusion criteria: not specified
Exclusion criteria: not specified
Interventions Intervention group: operated on with ECC.O (Sorin, Italy). The ECC.O system comprised a small membrane oxygenator and centrifugal pump (Stockert, Sorin, Germany).
Control group: CECC (Maquet); for CECC (group C), a membrane oxygenator with cardiotomy reservoir and a roller pump (Maquet)
Outcomes Myocardial protection (TnT and CK‐MB); IL‐1b, IL‐6, IL‐10, TNF‐a, MIF, RAGE, and CD40L; need for blood transfusion; mechanical ventilation time; duration of ischaemic time; total duration of surgery; or the number of grafts and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events)
Arterial blood samples were collected at intervals before CPB (T0), 30 min after initiation (T1), after termination of CPB (T2), 6 h after CPB (T3), and 24 h after CPB (T4).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Consecutive patients with comparable preoperative characteristics but no further randomisation method description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information around allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not specified
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not specified
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No trial group changes, no withdrawals, and no losses to follow‐up reported, but no ITT analysis. Data from all the patients were included in the final analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected outcomes were reported properly.
Other bias Low risk The authors declared no conflict of interest.