| Solanki 2015 |
High risk of bias |
There is no information on allocation concealment and baseline characteristics suggest a mismatch between the two groups despite randomisation. |
Low risk of bias |
Though the personnel were aware of the intervention allocation, but there seems to be no deviations that arouse outside the trial context. Also all patients analysed as randomised. |
Low risk of bias |
Data reasonably complete for all the included patients |
Some concerns |
Since the outcome is a subjective one and that the assessors were aware of the intervention, there is a likelihood of assessment being influenced by the knowledge of the allocation group. The authors have given details of the seizure definition used and who diagnosed the seizures. |
Low risk of bias |
Trial analysed as per a priori registered protocol. |
High risk of bias |
High risk in one domain |
