Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 23;22:322. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04749-2

Table 3.

Overall diagnostic accuracy of microscopy, RDT, and uRDT compared to qPCR as a reference test for the diagnosis of malaria

qPCR Total Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Value (95%CI)
(+) (-) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) LR(+) (95% CI) LR(-) (95% CI) Kappa (95% CI)
Microscopy (+) 88 5 93 55.7% (47.6–63.6) 98.5% (96.6–99.5) 94.6% (88.0–97.7) 82.7% (80.0–85.0) 37.8 (15.7–91.1) 0.46 (0.4–0.5) 0.60 (0.53–0.68)
(-) 70 334 404
RDT (+) 129 16 145 81.7% (74.7–87.3) 95.2% (92.5–97.2) 89% (83.2–92.9) 91.7% (88.9 – 94.0) 17.3 (10.7–28.1) 0.19 (0.1–0.3) 0.78 (0.72–0.84)
(-) 29 323 352
uRDT (+) 139 19 158 88% (81.9–92.6) 94.4% (91.4–96.6) 88% (82.5–91.9) 94.4% (91.7–96.2) 15.7 (10.0–24.4) 0.13 (0.1–0.2) 0.82 (0.77–0.87)
(-) 19 320 339

Pf (P. falciparum); RDT (rapid diagnostic test); uRDT (ultrasensitive rapid diagnostic test); qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction); (+) (positive); (-) (negative); PPV (positive predictive value); NPV (negative predictive value); CI (confidence interval);LR: Likelihood ratio