Table 1.
Study | Population | Intervention | A. Fluids from Presentation to Study Enrollment* | B. Fluids from Study Enrollment to Study Hour 6*† | C. Total Fluids from Presentation to Study Hour 6 (A + B)* | ScvO2 at Study Enrollment | Outcomes‡ (Intervention vs. Control) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rivers et al. (7) | 263 patients with septic shock in 1 U.S. emergency department | EGDT vs. usual care | N/A, prerandomization fluids were included in total reported fluids from Hours 0–6 (column B) | EGDT: 4,981 ml; standard therapy: 3,499 ml; (mean), P < 0.001 | EGDT: 4,981 ml; standard therapy: 3,499 ml; (mean), P < 0.001 | EGDT: 48.6% ± 11.2%; standard therapy: 49.2% ± 13.3%; (mean), P = 0.49 | In-hospital mortality: 30.5% vs. 46.5%; P = 0.009 |
ARISE (8) | 1,600 patients with septic shock in 51 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand | EGDT vs. usual care | EGDT: 2,515 ml; usual care: 2,591 ml; (mean), P value not reported | EGDT: 1,964 ml; usual care: 1,713 ml; (mean), P < 0.001 | EGDT: 4,479 ml; usual care: 4,304 ml; (mean), P value not calculated | EGDT: 72.7% ± 10.5% (mean); ScvO2 was not monitored in the usual care group | 90-d mortality: 18.6% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.90 |
ProCESS (9) | 1,341 patients with septic shock in 31 U.S. hospitals | EGDT vs. protocol-based “standard” therapy vs. usual care | EDGT: 2,254 ml; protocol: 2,226 ml; usual care: 2,083 ml; (mean), P = 0.15 | EGDT: 2,805 ml; protocol: 3,285 ml; usual care: 2,279 ml; (mean), P < 0.001 | EDGT: 5,059 ml; protocol: 5,511 ml; usual care: 4,362 ml; (mean), P value not reported | Overall: 71% ± 13% (mean); ScvO2 was not routinely monitored in usual care group | 60-d in-hospital mortality: 21.8% vs. 18.2% vs. 18.9%; P = 0.83 |
ProMISe (10) | 1,260 patients with septic shock in 56 hospitals in England | EGDT vs. usual care | EDGT: 1,950 ml; usual care: 2,000 ml; (median), P value not reported | EGDT: 2,000 ml; usual care: 1,784 ml; (median), P value not reported | EDGT: 3,950 ml; usual care: 3,784 ml; (median), P value not reported | Overall: 70% ± 12% (mean); ScvO2 was not routinely monitored in usual care group | 90-d mortality: 29.5% vs. 29.2%; P = 0.90; EGDT was associated with higher organ-failure scores, more days of cardiovascular support, and longer ICU stays |
Definition of abbreviations: ARISE = Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation; EGDT = early goal-directed therapy; N/A = not applicable; ProCESS = Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock; ProMISe = Protocolized Management in Sepsis; ScvO2 = central venous oxygen saturation.
Rivers and colleagues (7) reported the total fluid patients received from presentation to Hour 6, whereas the ARISE, ProCESS, and ProMISe trials reported the fluid patients received before study enrollment and from study enrollment to Study Hour 6 separately, as denoted in columns A and B above. Column C is a summation of total fluid received before enrollment and during the first 6 hours of study enrollment in the ARISE, ProCESS, and ProMISe trials, to facilitate a comparison to the amount of fluid patients received in Rivers and colleagues.
Values do not include fluid received before randomization.
Listed as intervention versus usual care; P value.