Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21(Suppl 2):S297–S361. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0081-x

Indications for ICP monitoring. Are there clinical or CT findings that predict the development of intracranial hypertension and so can guide decision making about ICP monitor placement?

Reference # of patients Design Grade crit. Results Caveats
Hukkelhoven et al. [105] 134 monitored patients Single-centre, retrospective observational analysis of admission clinical predictors of ICP elevation Low No univariate predictors with p < 0.05. Model discrimination (AUC) = 0.50 (95 % CI 0.41–0.58) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit) = 0.18 No admission CT data. No control for decision to monitor. Subjective classification of intracranial hypertension. Used only hourly ICP data
Toutant et al. [6] 218 Single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospective observational data on correlation of cisterns on admission CT and ICP Low 74 % of monitored patients with absent cisterns had ICP > 30 mmHg Lack of rigorous definition and standardization of cisternal compression
Mizutani et al. [7] 100 Single-centre, retrospective analysis of correlation of admission CT parameters and initial ICP Low Admission CT findings that contributed to predicting initial degree of intracranial hypertension included (in order of predictive power) cisternal compression, subdural size, ventricular size (III and IV), intracerebral haematoma size, and subarachnoid haemorrhage ICP monitored by subarachnoid catheter. No data on later development of intracranial hypertension
Eisenberg et al. [8] 753 Multi-centre, retrospective analysis of prospective observational data on prediction of abnormal ICP Mod For first 72 h, strongest (p < 0.001) independent predictors of percent of monitored time that ICP > 20 mmHg were abnormal mesencephalic cisterns, midline shift, and subarachnoid blood. For ICP occurrences >20 mmHg, the strongest (p < 0.001) was cisternal compression, with age, midline shift, and intraventricular blood reaching p < 0.05 Used only end-hour ICP values
Kishore et al. [9] 137 (47 with normal admission CT) Single-centre, retrospective observational analysis of correlation of final Marshall CT classification with ICP course Low Elevated ICP was present in ≥55 % of patients with intra- or extra-axial haematomas. 17 % of patients with normal admission CT imaging had ICP > 20 mmHg Used only intermittent ICP measurements. Did not separate out patients with persistently normal CT imaging
Narayan et al., 1982 [5] 226 Single-centre retrospective observational study of predictors of intracranial hypertension Low Association with intracranial hypertension for abnormal admission CT = 53–63 %; for normal admission CT = 13 %. 2+ of predictive variables* with normal CT had 60 % incidence (*age > 40 years, systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg, or motor posturing) No magnitude for ICP elevation. No prospective verification of normal CT model. Examined only admission CT imaging. Used only end-hour ICP values
Miller et al., 2004 [10] 82 Single-centre retrospective observational study modeling CT characteristics as predictors of intracranial hypertension Low Initial CT ventricle size, basilar cisterns, sulcal size, transfalcine herniation, and gray/white differentiation were associated with, but not predictive of intracranial hypertension Non-standardised CT variable grading system. Small sample size for modeling. No magnitude for ICP elevation
Lobato et al., 1983 [11] 277 Single-centre, retrospective observational study of outcome of monitored patients Low Normal CT imaging post evacuation of extracerebral haematomas did not have ICP problems; normal, non-operative scans had 15 % incidence of intracranial hypertension, none severe (>35 mmHg). Other combinations of contusions or brain swelling had much higher incidences No multivariate statistics for ICP. Examined only admission CT imaging
Poca et al. [12] 94 Single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospective observational data on correlation of final Marshall CT classification with ICP course Low Development of intracranial hypertension by final Marshall Classification: DI I = 0 %; DI II = 28.6 % (10 % uncontrollable); DI III = 63.2 % (1/3 uncontrollable); DI IV = 100 % (all uncontrollable); EML = 65.2 % (1/2 uncontrollable); NEML = 84.6 % (1/2 uncontrollable) Did not separately report admission CT class as predictive of ICP course. Used only intermittent ICP measurements
Miller et al. [59] 225 Single-centre, retrospective observational study of ICP and outcome of consecutive sTBI patients Low Less than 25 % incidence of persistent ICP > 20 mmHg in patients with normal admission CT imaging Little detail on patients with normal admission CT
Holliday et al. [106] 17 Single-centre, retrospective observational study of ICP course of patients with normal admission CT imaging Low 86 % of their patients with normal admission CT and ICP > 25 mmHg had associated pulmonary complications. Patients with “normal” admission CT did not develop intracranial hypertension Examined only admission CT imaging. Implications of “secondary” ICP elevation unclear. Normal CT could include cisternal compression, slit ventricles
Lobato et al. [107] 46 patients (39 monitored) Single-centre, retrospective observational study of ICP course of patients with repeatedly normal CT imaging Low No patient with persistently normal admission CT had sustained intracranial hypertension. Within the first 24 h, 10 % had transient ICP elevation below 25 mmHg Examined only admission CT imaging.
O’Sullivan et al. [108] 22 patients (8 with highresolution monitoring) Single-centre, retrospective observational analysis of ICP course in patients without signs of ICP elevation on admission CT Low 88 % had intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mmHg), severe (protracted period ≥ 30 mmHg) in 62 % Primary ICP monitoring by subdural systems
Lee et al. [13] 36 Single-centre, retrospective observational analysis of ICP course in patients with CT diagnosis of DAI Low 28 % had no ICP > 20 mmHg, 47 % had ICP values 21–30 mmHg and 25 % had ICP values >30 mmHg. Only 1 patient (3 %) underwent treatment Used only intermittent ICP measurements. Incomplete description of management methods