Biomarkers for outcome following cardiac arrest without therapeutic hypothermia treatment
| Authors/year | Population | N | Biomarker | Sample source | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecules of CNS Origin | |||||
| Zandbergen, 2006 | Post cardiac arrest, unconscious >24 h after CPR | 407 | NSE, s100β | Serum | 100 % of patients with NSE > 33 μg/L at any time had a poor outcome (40 % PPV; 0 % FPR) s100β > 0.7 μg/L at 24–72 h post cardiac arrest predicts poor outcome (47 % PPV; 2 % FPR) Performance of clinical tests was inferior to SSEP and NSE in predicting outcome |
| Meynaar, 2003 | Post cardiac arrest, comatose post CPR | 110 | NSE | Serum | NSE at 24 and 48 h after CPR was significantly higher in patients who did not regain consciousness versus those who did No one with NSE > 25 μg/L at any time regained consciousness (100 % specificity) |
| Pfeifer, 2005 | Post cardiac arrest within 12 h of ROSC, survived >48 h | 97 | NSE, s100β | Serum | NSE > 65 μg/L predicted increased risk of death and persistent vegetative state at 28 days post CPR (97 % PPV) s100β > 1.5 μg/L predicts poor outcome (96 % PPV) |
| Rosen, 2001 | Out of hospital cardiac arrest | 66 | s100β, NSE | Serum | s100β > 0.217 μg/L and NSE > 23.2 μg/L at 2 days post cardiac arrest predicted poor 1-year outcome (100 % PPV) |
| Bottiger, 2001 | Non-traumatic out of hospital cardiac arrest | 66 | s100β | Serum | Significant differences in s100β level between survivors and non-survivors after cardiac arrest were observed from 30 min to 7 days post cardiac arrest s100β > 1.10 μg/L at 48 h post cardiac arrest predicted brain damage (100 % specificity) |
| Martens, 1998 | Post cardiac arrest, unconscious and ventilated for >24 h | 64 | NSE, s100β | Serum | s100β and NSE were significantly higher in patients who did not regain consciousness compared of those who did s100β > 0.7 μg/L is a predictor of not regaining consciousness after cardiac arrest (95 % PPV; 96 % specificity) NSE > 20 μg/L predicted poor outcome (51 % sensitivity; 89 % specificity) |
| Hachimi-Idrissi, 2002 | Post cardiac arrest | 58 | s100β | Serum | s100β > 0.7 μg/L at admission predicted not regaining consciousness (85 % specificity; 66.6 % sensitivity; 84 % PPV; 78 % NPV; 77.6 % accuracy) |
| Schoerkhuber, 1999 | Non-traumatic out of hospital cardiac arrest | 56 | NSE | Serum | NSE was significantly higher in patients who had poor 6 month outcome at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after ROSC NSE cutoffs for poor outcome were: NSE > 38.5 μg/L at 12 h, NSE > 40 μg/L at 24 h, NSE > 25.1 μg/L at 48 h, and NSE > 16.4 μg/L at 72 h (100 % specificity) NSE > 27.3 μg/L at any time predicted poor outcome (100 % specificity) |
| Molecules of non-CNS origin | |||||
| Nagao, 2004 | Age > 17 years, out of hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin | 401 | BNP | Blood | Rate of survival to hospital discharge decreased in dose-dependent fashion with increasing quartiles of BNP on admission BNP > 100 pg/mL predicted lack of survival until hospital discharge (83 % sensitivity; 96 % NPV) |
| Kasai, 2011 | Post cardiac arrest | 357 | Ammonia | Blood | Elevated ammonia on ER arrival is associated with decreased odds for good outcome at hospital discharge (OR 0.98 [0.96–0.99]) Ammonia > 192.5 μg/dL had 100 % NPV for good outcome at discharge 61 patients were treated with TH |
| Sodeck, 2007 | Post cardiac arrest, comatose | 155 | BNP | Blood | Highest quartile BNP on admission is associated with poor outcome as compared to lowest quartile BNP > 230 pg/mL predicts unfavorable neurological outcome (OR 2.25 [1.05–4.81]) and death at 6 months (OR 4.7 [1.27–17.35]) |
| Shinozaki, 2011 | Non-traumatic out of hospital cardiac arrest with ROSC | 98 | Ammonia, lactate | Blood | Elevated ammonia and lactate on admission were associated with poor outcome Ammonia > 170 μg/dL predicted poor outcome (90 % sensitivity; 58 % specificity) Lactate > 12 mmol/L predicted poor outcome (90 % sensitivity; 52 % specificity) |
| CSF biomarkers | |||||
| Roine, 1989 | Out of hospital VF arrest who survived >24 h | 67 | NSE, CKBB | CSF | NSE and CKBB at 20–26 h post CPR were elevated in patients who did not regain consciousness compared with those who did All patients with NSE > 24 μg/L remained unconscious or died at 3 months (74 % sensitivity; 100 % specificity) CKBB > 17 μg/L predicted poor outcome (52 % sensitivity; 98 % specificity) |
| Sherman, 2000 | Comatose cardiac arrest patients with SSEP studies | 52 | CKBB | CSF | CKBB > 205U/L predicted non-awakening (49 % sensitivity; 100 % specificity) CSF sampling time not standardized |
| Martens, 1998 | Post cardiac arrest, unconscious, and ventilated for >48 h | 34 | NSE, s100β | CSF | s100β and NSE were both significantly higher in patients who did not regain consciousness compared of those who did NSE > 50 μg/L (89 % sensitivity; 83 % specificity) and s100β > 6 μg/L (93 % sensitivity; 60 % specificity) predicted death or vegetative state CSF sampling time is not standardized |
| Rosen, 2004 | Post cardiac arrest, survive > 12 days post ROSC | 22 | NFL | CSF | CSF sampled at 12–30 days after cardiac arrest NFL > 18,668 μg/L predicted dependency in ADL at 1 year (100 % specificity; 46 % sensitivity) |
| Karkela, 1993 | VF or asystolic arrest | 20 | CKBB, NSE | CSF | Case controlledCSF collected at 4, 28, and 76 h after resuscitation Elevated CKBB at 4 and 28 h, and elevated NSE at 28 and 76 h after cardiac arrest were associated with not regaining consciousness |
| Oda, 2012 | Out of hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac | 14 | HMGB1, s100β | CSF | CSF sampled at 48 h after ROSC HMGB1 and s100β were significantly higher in poor outcome group compared to good outcome group and to normal controls |
| Tirschwell, 1997 | Post cardiac arrest with CSF CKBB measured | 351 | CKBB | CSF | Retrospective study CSF sampling time not standardized CKBB > 205U/L predicted non-awakening at hospital discharge (100 % specificity; 48 % sensitivity) Only nine patients with CKBB > 50U/L awakened and none regained independent ADLs |
All studies are prospective observational unless otherwise noted
NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, FPR false positive rate, OR odds ratio, ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, SSEP somatosensory evoked potential, TH therapeutic hypothermia, VF ventricular fibrillation