Authors/year | Study design | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Markers of CNS origin | ||||||
Okonkwo, 2013 | Pro | Mild, moderate, and severe TBI | 215 | GFAP-BDP | Blood | Levels of GFAP-BDP were related to number of CT scan lesions and to neurological recovery A level of 0.68 μg/L was associated with a 21.61 OR for a positive CT and a 2.07 OR for failure to return to pre-injury baseline |
Metting, 2012 | Pro | Mild TBI | 94 | s100β. GFAP | Blood | Levels of GFAP but not s100β were related to outcome, but the PPV was not high (<50 %) |
Vos, 2010 | Pro | Moderate and severe TBI | 79 | s100β, GFAP | Blood | Levels of s100β and GFAP on admission were associated with poor outcome at 6 months and with mortality at 6 months even after adjusting for injury severity |
Vos, 2004 | Pro | Severe TBI | 85 | s100β, NSE, GFAP | Blood | s100β, NSE, and GFAP were all higher in non-survivors and in those with poor 6-month outcome s100β > 1.13 μg/L predicted death with 100 % discrimination |
Wiesmann, 2009 | Pro | Mild, moderate, and severe TBI | 60 | s100β, GFAP | Blood | Levels of s100β and GFAP were correlated with 6 month GOS Levels of s100β at 24 h post-injury had the highest correlation |
Pelinka, 2004 | Pro | TBI within 12 h | 92 | s100β, GFAP | Blood | GFAP and s100β were higher in non-survivors and predicted mortality |
Nylen, 2008 | Pro | Severe TBI | 59 | s100β, s100a1b, s100βb | Blood | Levels of s100β, s100a1b, and s100βb were all related to 1 year GOS |
Nylen, 2006 | Pro | Severe TBI | 59 | GFAP | Blood | Levels of GFAP were independently associated with 1-year outcome |
Olivecrona, 2009 | Pro | Severe TBI | 48 | s100β, NSE | Blood | Levels of NSE and s100β were not significantly related to outcome at 3 or 12 months |
Topolovec-Vranic, 2011 | Pro | Mild TBI within 4 h | 141 | s100β, NSE | Blood | s100β predicted poor cognitive outcome at 1 week NSE is independently associated with poor cognitive outcome at 6 weeks post-injury |
Rainey, 2009 | Pro | Severe TBI within 24 h | 100 | s100β | Blood | s100β at 24 h post injury were higher in patients with unfavorable outcome s100β > 0.53 μg/L predicted poor outcome (>80 % sensitivity; 60 % specificity) |
Thelin, 2013 | Retro | Severe TBI | 265 | s100β | Blood | Levels of s100β between 12 and 36 h of injury were correlated with 6–12 months GOS and remained significantly related to outcome after adjustment for injury severity factors |
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 2012 | Pro | Severe TBI | 55 | s100β | Blood urine | Blood and urine s100β at 24 h post-TBI were significantly higher in non-survivors Serum s100β > 0.461 μg/L (88.4 % specificity) and urine s100β > 0.025 μg/L (62.8 % specificity) predicted mortality |
Kay, 2003 | Case control | TBI with GCS < 8 | 27 TBI, 28 CTRL | ApoE, s100β | CSF | s100β is elevated and ApoE is decreased in TBI compared with controls |
Mondello, 2012 | Case control | Severe TBI | 95 | UCH-L1 | Blood, CSF | Blood and CSF levels of UCH-L1 were higher in patients with lower GCS, in patients who died, and in patients with unfavorable outcome. Levels at 6 h had the highest correlation Cumulative serum UCH-L1 > 5.22 μg/L predicted death with OR 4.8 |
Brophy, 2011 | Pro | Severe TBI GCS ≤ 8 | 86 (blood), 59 (CSF) | UCH-L1 | Blood, CSF | Non-survivors had higher median serum and CSF UCH-L1 levels in the first 24 h |
Papa, 2010 | Pro | TBI GCS ≤ 8 with EVD | 41 TBI, 25 CTRL | UCH-L1 | CSF | UCH-L1 was higher in TBI compared with controls at all time points up to 168 h Levels of UCH-L1 were higher in patients with a lower GCS at 24 h, post-injury complications, in those died within 6 weeks, and in those with poor outcome at 6 months |
Papa, 2012 | Pro | Mild and moderate TBI GCS 9–15 | 96 TBI, 199 CTRL | UCH-L1 | Blood | UCH-L1 within 4 h of injury distinguished TBI from uninjured controls (AUC = 0.87 [0.82–0.92]) UCH-L1 was associated with severity of injury in TBI |
Liliang, 2010 | Pro | Severe TBI | 34 | Tau | Blood | Tau levels were significantly higher in patients with a poor outcome Remained significant when adjusted for injury severity factors |
Pineda, 2007 | Pro | Severe TBI | 41 | SBDP145, SBDP150 | CSF | SBDP145 and 150 levels were significantly related to outcome at 6 months |
Brophy, 2009 | Case control | Severe TBI | 38 | SBDP145, SBDP150 | CSF | SBDP145 and 150 levels were higher in patients with worse GCS and longer ICP elevation |
Mondello, 2010 | Pro | Severe TBI | 40 TBI, 24 CTRL | SBDP145, SBDP120 | CSF | SBDP145 > 6 μg/L (OR 5.9) and SBDP 120 > 17.55 μg/L (OR 18.34) predicted death SBDP145 within 24 h of injury correlated with GCS score |
Inflammatory markers | ||||||
Schneider Soares, 2012 | Pro | Mild, moderate, and severe TBI | 127 | IL-10, TNFα | Blood | Levels of IL-10 but not TNFα were related to mortality, even when adjusted for injury severity characteristics |
Stein, 2012 | Pro | Severe TBI | 68 | IL-8, TNFα | Serum | High levels of both IL-8 and TNFα predicted subsequent development of intracranial hypertension (specificity was high but sensitivity was low) |
Tasci, 2003 | Pro | Mild, moderate, and severe TBI | 48 | IL-1 | Blood | IL-1 levels within 6 h correlated with the initial injury severity (GCS) and with GOS, but timing of the GOS is not described |
Antunes, 2010 | Pro | TBI with hemorrhagic contusions | 30 | IL-6 | Blood | IL-6 levels at 6 h were higher in patients who would subsequently clinically deteriorate due to evolving contusions |
Combinations of markers | ||||||
Diaz-Arrastia, 2013 | Pro | Mild, moderate, and severe TBI | 206 | UCH-L1, GFAP | Blood | Levels of UCH-L1 were higher with moderate-severe than with mild TBI UCH-L1 levels were poorly predictive of complete recovery but better at predicting poor outcome For predicting complete recovery, UCH-L1 in combination with GFAP was not better than GFAP alone. For predicting favorable versus unfavorable outcome, UCH-L1 is marginally better than GFAP and both together are better than either alone |
Czeiter, 2012 | Pro | Severe TBI | 45 | GFAP, UCH-L1, SBDP145 | Serum, CSF | GFAP, UCH-L1, and SBDP145 all had at least one measure that was significantly related to unfavorable outcome When included in a model with IMPACT predictors of outcome, serum GFAP during first 24 h and the first CSF UCH-L1 value obtained were significantly related to mortality and only serum GFAP during first 24 h was significantly related to unfavorable outcome In combination, the IMPACT core model with the first CSF GFAP value, the first serum GFAP value, and the first CSF SBDP145 value performed the best |
Pro prospective, PPV positive predictive value, Retro retrospective, CTRL control subjects, GOS Glasgow outcome scale, OR odds ratio, PPV positive predictive value