Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess comprehensively the validity of the data in the Finnish Medical Birth Registry (MBR) by the combined use of several controls and internal analysis of the data. DESIGN--The MBR data were individually linked to a medical record sample (n = 775) and to all perinatal death certificates in 1987. The data were also compared with annual hospital statistics. The distributions of birth weights and gestational ages were examined. SUBJECTS--All stillborn and liveborn babies registered in the MBR in 1987 (n = 59,370). SETTING--The nationwide MBR data were compared with medical records from one third of the Finnish hospitals, with statistics for all hospitals, and with nationwide cause of death registry data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--With regard to most variables, the data quality was good or satisfactory (agreement with medical records 95% or more). Allowing for minor deviations in variables with continuous scales improved the agreement rates further. Explanations could be deduced for items with poor agreement values. For most variables, the amount of missing data was less than 1%. With the exception of caesarean sections, medical procedures were registered in only 30 to 72% of the cases, and the proportion varied strongly between the hospitals. Common diagnoses (32 to 86%) and primary causes of death (59 to 78%) were also poorly recorded. CONCLUSIONS--Combined use of several control materials and internal analyses was successful in investigating the whole data content. The data in the MBR were generally valid but diagnoses and most data on medical procedures were not of sufficiently good quality.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barry J. An evaluation of the notification of birth form. Ir J Med Sci. 1989 May;158(5):102–104. doi: 10.1007/BF02943034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron H. M., McGoogan E. A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification. J Pathol. 1981 Apr;133(4):273–283. doi: 10.1002/path.1711330402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cnattingius S., Ericson A., Gunnarskog J., Källén B. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1990 Jun;18(2):143–148. doi: 10.1177/140349489001800209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole S. K. Accuracy of death certificates in neonatal deaths. Community Med. 1989 Feb;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- David R. J. The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files. Am J Public Health. 1980 Sep;70(9):964–973. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.9.964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demlo L. K., Campbell P. M., Brown S. S. Reliability of information abstracted from patients' medical records. Med Care. 1978 Dec;16(12):995–1005. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197812000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fedrick J., Butler N. R. Accuracy of registered causes of neonatal deaths in 1958. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1972 May;26(2):101–105. doi: 10.1136/jech.26.2.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frost F., Starzyk P., George S., McLaughlin J. F. Birth complication reporting: the effect of birth certificate design. Am J Public Health. 1984 May;74(5):505–506. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.5.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greb A. E., Pauli R. M., Kirby R. S. Accuracy of fetal death reports: comparison with data from an independent stillbirth assessment program. Am J Public Health. 1987 Sep;77(9):1202–1206. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.9.1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammes L. M., Treloar A. E. Gestational interval from vital records. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1970 Aug;60(8):1496–1505. doi: 10.2105/ajph.60.8.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hemminki E., Teperi J., Tuominen K. Need for and influence of feedback from the Finnish birth register to data providers. Qual Assur Health Care. 1992 Jun;4(2):133–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hewson D., Bennett A. Childbirth research data: medical records or women's reports? Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Mar;125(3):484–491. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horwitz R. I., Yu E. C. Assessing the reliability of epidemiologic data obtained from medical records. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(11):825–831. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosecoff J., Fink A., Brook R. H., Chassin M. R. The appropriateness of using a medical procedure. Is information in the medical record valid? Med Care. 1987 Mar;25(3):196–201. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198703000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LILIENFELD A. M., PARKHURST E., PATTON R., SCHLESINGER E. R. Accuracy of supplemental medical information on birth certificates. Public Health Rep. 1951 Feb 16;66(7):191–198. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maresh M., Dawson A. M., Beard R. W. Assessment of an on-line computerized perinatal data collection and information system. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Dec;93(12):1239–1245. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07858.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCarthy B. J., Terry J., Rochat R. W., Quave S., Tyler C. W., Jr The underregistration of neonatal deaths: Georgia 1974--77. Am J Public Health. 1980 Sep;70(9):977–982. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.9.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romm F. J., Putnam S. M. The validity of the medical record. Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):310–315. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roos L. L., Sharp S. M., Wajda A. Assessing data quality: a computerized approach. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(2):175–182. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]