Table 2.
Participants’ satisfaction with the YACHA-led intervention (N = 15): After the intervention (T1).
| Items | Satisfied/very satisfied n (%) | Neutral n (%) | Unsatisfied n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| The YACHA-led intervention design is very good. | 13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| The duration of the YACHA-led intervention is appropriate. | 13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| I found component of the YACHA-led intervention easy to understand. | 13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Relevancy of educational information | |||
|
13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
|
14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
|
14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
|
14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
|
12 (80.0) | 3 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Overall relevancy of educational information | 13.5 (90.0) | 1.5 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Performance of YACHA | |||
|
13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
13 (86.7) | 1 (6.7) | 1 (6.7) |
|
13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Overall performance of YACHA | 13.2 (88.0) | 1.6 (10.6) | 0.2 (1.3) |
| Overall, I am satisfied with YACHA-led intervention | 14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
YACHA, Young Adult Community Health Advisor. All data are presented as frequencies (%).