Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 27;31(11):4977–4987. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07546-1

Table 2.

Defect characteristics based on MRI and intraoperative findings

Defect locationa n (%)
 Retropatellar 19 (55.9)
 Medial FC 5 (14.7)
 Lateral FC 5 (14.7)
 Medial + lateral FC 1 (2.9)
 Medial FC + retropatellar 1 (2.9)
 Lateral FC + retropatellar 1 (2.9)
 Trochlear groove 1 (2.9)
 Tibial 1 (2.9)
Appearance on MRI
 Defect size
  ≤ 1cm2 4 (12.9)
  > 1cm2 ≤ 2cm2 17 (54.8)
  > 2cm2 ≤ 4cm2 6 (19.4)
  > 4cm2 ≤ 6cm2 4 (12.9)
  ≥ 6cm2 0 (0)
 Chondral defect
  (a) Signal alteration 2 (6.5)
  (b) Partial-thickness defect 17 (54.8)
  (c) Full-thickness defect 12 (38.7)
Intraoperative appearance
 Defect size
  ≤ 1cm2 3 (8.8)
  > 1cm2 ≤ 2cm2 7 (20.4)
  > 2cm2 ≤ 4cm2 12 (35.2)
  > 4cm2 ≤ 6cm2 8 (23.5)
  ≥ 6cm2 4 (11.7)
 ICRS grading
 Grade 1 0 (0)
 Grade 2 0 (0)
 Grade 3 19 (61.3)
 Grade 4 12 (38.7)

Data displayed as number (per cent)

FC femoral Condyle, ICRS International Cartilage Repair Society, MRI magnetic resonance imaging

aMultiple locations possible